|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 270-275
Diabetes ongoing sustainable care and treatment (DOST): A strategy for informational deliverance through visual dynamic modules sustained by near peer mentoring
Ankur Joshi1, Vishwanath Arutagi2, Nitin Nahar3, Sharad Tiwari2, Daneshwar Singh2, Soumitra Sethia2
1 Department of Community and Family Medicine, AIIMS, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
2 Department of Community Medicine, GMC, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
3 Department of Medicine, GMC, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
|Date of Web Publication||18-Oct-2016|
Assistant Professor, Department of Community and Family Medicine, AIIMS, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: The informational continuity for a diabetic patient is of paramount importance. This study on a pilot basis explores the process utility of structured educational modular sessions grounded on the principle of near-peer mentoring. Methodology: Visual modules were prepared for diabetic patients. These modules were instituted to 25 diabetic patients in logical sequences. In the next phase, 4 persons of these 25 patients were designated as diabetic-diabetes ongoing sustainable care and treatment (DOST). Each diabetic-DOST was clubbed with two patients for modular session and informational deliverance during the next 7 days. Process analysis was performed with “proxy-indicators,” namely, monthly glycemic status, knowledge assessment scores, and quality of life. Data were analyzed by interval estimates and through nonparametric analysis. Results: Nonparametric analysis indicated a significant improvement in glycemic status in terms with fasting blood sugar (W = 78 z = 3.04, P = 0.002), 2 h-postprandial blood sugar (W = 54, z = 2.01, P = 0.035), and in knowledge score (c2 = 19.53, df = 3; P = 0.0002). Quality of life score showed significant improvement in 2 out of 7 domains, namely, satisfaction with treatment ([difference in mean score = 1.40 [1.94 to 0.85]) and symptom botherness (difference in mean score = 0.98 [1.3–0.65]). Conclusion: Because of inherent methodological limitations and innate biases, at this juncture no conclusive statement can be drawn. Although, primitive process evidences indicate the promising role of the diabetic-DOST strategy.
Keywords: Glycemic status, informational continuity, near peer mentoring
|How to cite this article:|
Joshi A, Arutagi V, Nahar N, Tiwari S, Singh D, Sethia S. Diabetes ongoing sustainable care and treatment (DOST): A strategy for informational deliverance through visual dynamic modules sustained by near peer mentoring. J Family Med Prim Care 2016;5:270-5
|How to cite this URL:|
Joshi A, Arutagi V, Nahar N, Tiwari S, Singh D, Sethia S. Diabetes ongoing sustainable care and treatment (DOST): A strategy for informational deliverance through visual dynamic modules sustained by near peer mentoring. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Aug 12];5:270-5. Available from: http://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2016/5/2/270/192363
| Introduction|| |
Diabetes shares a major contribution in morbidity and mortality attributed to noncommunicable diseases in the Indian subcontinent. Indeed India has ominously achieved the gloomy position of diabetes capital of the world. The adverse effect of disease on every organ system and its economic impact is a matter of concern at individual and population perspective. As of now, there is no potential curative modality available for diabetes so a person once labeled as “diabetic” has to live with the disease and its impending future implications., This compelling long-term alliance with disease demands some essential adjustments made by patients for accommodating to the requirements of the disease and its complications. This accustomization demands the accessibility of informational continuity and uninterrupted psycho-behavioral support many a time.,,, Several evidence have indeed endorsed this fact that gratification of informational need and supportive care is as vital as anti-diabetic medication in achieving the good glycemic control.,,,,
At this juncture, it may be prudent to think that whether this whole process of imparting information to a diabetic patient may be further reinforced and fortified with systematized time-tested educational techniques. Near-peer mentoring is a term borrowed from “education technology” which describes a unique empowering relationship in which “earned experiences and received wisdom” by the elder students are shared with his younger one (by virtue of duration spent in that particular environment) constantly., This bi-directional interaction provides an opportunity for younger-ones to be coached and counseled. On one hand, the younger ones receive information, advice, support, and encouragement whenever required, it also offers an opportunity for the elder one to revisit and reflect on his learning, perceptions and thoughts around a subject whenever he shares the information and extends his support.,, Thus, the process of near-peer mentoring may grant a privileged level of mutual assistance in which both individuals are mutually benefitted.,,, Can this mutually beneficial mentorship be initiated in chronic diseases like diabetes - this is the question to which this study is attempting to find an answer based on some “proxy” variables. This study is, in fact, the extension of another study (published in this journal) where investigators tried to disseminate information through crafted images for ease of processing through dynamic visual stimulations and further into actionable knowledge by the patient.
| Methodology|| |
This facility based longitudinal follow-up study was conducted over a period of 1 year in the catchment area of an Urban Health Training Center. This study is the structured expansion (operationalization) of another study in which visual modules (using dynamic animation and image impositions) in vernacular (Hindi) were prepared, and effectiveness of these modules was ascertained by thematic analysis. Interested readers on the process of modular preparation can refer to the article published in the Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care at July–September 2015 issue which offers a detailed description for the same. After modular crafting, 25 diabetes patients (resided in the catchment area of Urban Health Training Centre under the aegis of Community Medicine Department) were registered for the study. For the study purpose, a diabetic was defined as – A person with fasting blood glucose ≥126 mg/dl on two separate occasions or 2 h postprandial blood glucose ≥200 mg/dl on two separate occasions or HbA1c ≥6.5. All patients presented with co-existing compelling complications namely moderate and severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy a proliferative diabetic retinopathy; end-stage kidney disease, infected foot ulcers, New York Heart Association (0 stage 3 and 4 were excluded from the study as they might need vigorous intervention. The recruitment was followed by the division of participants into small batches with five participants in each. Each batch received three sessions in 3 subsequent days as per division of visual module using audiovisual aid. All the participants were constantly explained about their own concerns in between the sessions.
Of these educationally intervened 25 persons, 4 persons consented to serve as diabetic-diabetes ongoing sustainable care and treatment (DOST). These 4 persons served as the mentor for another 8 newly diagnosed diabetic patients detected from the community. Each diabetic-DOST was thus assigned the primary responsibility to educate the 2 patients on the predesignated aspects of disease with the aid of visual module in divided sessions for a duration of 3 h for 3 subsequent days. These initial sessions were closely supervised by the investigators. A day was fixed (1st/2nd/3rd/4th/Mondays of every month for 4 near-peer groups) for educational reinforcement of participants for a duration of next 6 months. These 6 follow-up sessions were primarily moderated by designated diabetic-DOST and supportively supervised by the investigators. Fasting and postprandial sugar assessment of the patients were done during these monthly visits for 6 months. Patients were also told to report encountered hypoglycemia events in between the two visits.
As most of the patients fitted to lower socioeconomic strata and as there was no HbA1c facility available in the center, the effectiveness of this process was appraised on a nascent basis by following “proxy” variables:
- Time trend analysis of blood sugar monitoring (fasting, 2 h postprandial blood sugar [PPBS]) - At monthly interval on initial visit and subsequently at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th months through glucometer (seven readings per person in 7 months)
- Knowledge assessment score about diabetes at preeducational session and then 2nd and 4th months of follow-up through a structured 20 items questionnaire. The questions in this questionnaire were in alignment with received information.
- The quality of life assessment through a prevalidated questionnaire relevant to Indian set-up in seven domain - role imitation due to physical health, physical endurance, general health, treatment satisfaction, symptom botherness, financial worries, emotional/mental health, diet satisfaction at before intervention, and during the 3rd months in the process.
Data were entered into MS Excel and was descriptively analyzed with the data analysis tool (add-ins in MS-Excel). Nonparametric analysis for glycemic status and knowledge was performed using Wilcoxon signed rank test and Friedman test, respectively.
| Results|| |
The mean age of the participants was 42.6 ± 5.9 years. Of these 12 selected participants for intervention, 7 were males and 5 were females. The results of the interventions are shown in following sections.
Time trend analysis of glycemic status
Cumulative fasting blood sugar (FBS) of the group showed a decline from (131–168 mg/dl) to (94–124 mg/dl) in a spawn of 6 months while the downward trend in 2 h PPBS was not much obvious ([214–264mg/dl] to [140–226 mg/dl]) for the studied group.
To compensate the effect of unknown potential cofounders, the glycemic values of the participants were subdivided into first 4 months (1st half) and in subsequent 3 months (2nd half). Average values of both the halves were calculated [Table 1] and [Table 2]. These paired values were further analyzed by Wilcoxon signed rank test which showed a significant difference (improvement) both in FBS (sum of the signed rank [W] =78, number of signed rank = ns/r = 12, z = 3.04, P = 0.002) and 2 h PPBS (sum of the signed rank [W] =54, number of signed rank = ns/r = 12, z = 2.01, P = 0.035) in both halves. This is shown in [Table 1] and [Table 2].
|Table 1: Glycemic status (fasting blood sugar) of participants in first 4 months and in next 3 months with nonparametric analysis|
Click here to view
|Table 2: Glycemic status (2 h postprandial blood sugar) of participants in first 4 months and in next 3 months with nonparametric analysis|
Click here to view
Knowledge assessment scores
The result of the knowledge assessment of participants is shown by the Radar diagram [Figure 1] which shows a cumulative knowledge and its expansion form baseline at immediate educational intervention period and then 2 and 4 months in the process (to ascertain the “recall” and “solidification” of received information). These grouped scores (prescore/postscores-immediate/postscores - 2 months/postscores – 4 months) were further analyzed statistically by Friedman test [Table 3] which showed a significant difference among the scores (c2 = 19.53, df = 3; P = 0.0002) at different time interval.
|Figure 1: Radar diagram showing the expansion of knowledge at different time interval|
Click here to view
|Table 3: Cumulative mean rank of knowledge assessment score at various time interval with nonparametric analysis|
Click here to view
Quality of life
Out of the seven domains (mentioned in the methodology section) only two domains namely treatment satisfaction and symptoms botherness were significantly affected during the process (3 months postintervention). Participants were found to be more satisfied with the treatment (difference in post- and pre-score = 1.40 [1.94–0.85]) and less worried about their symptoms (difference in post- and pre-score = 0.98 [1.31–0.65]) [Table 4]. Point estimates related to financial concerns and social role restriction even showed a dip during the process.
| Discussion|| |
Diabetes near-peer mentor (diabetic-DOST) can be understood as an informed diabetic person who offers the information to relatively novice diabetic and may satisfy his psychological support requirements.,,,,,,, This description of near-peer mentoring is in accordance with the proposed definition in education technology., There is some documented prerequirement of a near-peer mentor proposed by the educational institutes where this program is running. A near-peer mentor is supposed to be good in academics, communication skills and endowed with leadership skills. The same traits in a diabetic near-peer mentor (where academics can be replaced by informational richness) may enable him to assist actively the newcomer (newly diagnosed) to achieve his personal glycemic goal. This relationship has a bidirectional implication. The near-peer mentor also reflects and revisits his own approaches and degree of attainment of glycemic goal in this process and learns himself through teaching.,, Moreover, as in education near-peer mentoring has the distinct advantages of overcoming competitive drive among students (as a mentor is somewhat elder in an educational context rather of same stature) the diabetic-dost may be perceived as more accommodative and trustworthy by his collective wisdom gained through the experiential encounter with disease and knowledge acquired.,,
This study attempts to generate some initial evidence on the process of structured educational sessions delivered on the interface of near-peer mentoring. The reason for choosing diabetes for this intervention is obvious. This disease along with hypertension and dyslipidemia is presenting itself as “modern day epidemic” with catastrophic consequences., Virtually, every organ-system is affected by the disease., Moreover, the disease being a life-long phenomenon also affects adversely the quality of life and economic productivity. With this context, it cannot be addressed by merely prescribing anti-diabetic medication or Insulin; rather informational need about disease, diet, complication and self-care are more decisive factors to decide the good glycemic control. Moreover, constant motivation and encouragement also interplay when it comes to adherence to medication, dietary plans, and life-style modification on a long-term basis., These requirements of the patient are indeed very difficult to fulfill in a hectic and busy out-patient set up alone by a physician. Hence, to take care of patient needs and concerns, we may think about the development of an educational and support system through support groups who are also travelling through the similar path.,, Creation of peer group support system is well-documented in literature not only for diabetes and other chronic disease related to kidney/heart but also for further cultivating positive life-style changes such as a fitness program.,,,,
At this juncture, the study cannot make any generalized statement about the effectiveness of the support group firmly. The effect on glycemic status (more pronounce on fasting sugar) may be a cumulative effect of several other factors apart from this intervention, or it may be simply another example of Hawthorne effect in which participants had modified or improved an aspect of diet a night before the monthly follow-up. This may be a reason for better fasting glycemic control rather than postprandial status.
Health belief model clearly states the fundamental requirement of informational enrichment to deal with chronic diseases like diabetes., Only the person equipped with necessary information about disease will perceive the seriousness of disease and will act further to adapt positive lifestyle changes. This addressing of informational gap is very vital to remove the fear of unknown and further to take action deterministically by the patient.,,, The above-mentioned facts may be exploited to understand why two domains (namely treatment satisfaction and symptom botherness) related with quality of life showed improvement during the process. One plausible hypothesis for this phenomenon may be that informational richness of participants actually helped them to understand their disease more objectively and neutrally. Moreover, as this ordered information was received through the person having the same disease, the perceived authenticity might be more and the whole progression might be less stressful.
This study attempts only to look into the process doesn't claim at this juncture about the effectiveness of the intervention deterministically due to some limitations like nonrepresentative sample size to different demographic strata and glycemic status with little controls on confounders/biases. However, primitive process evidence indicates the promising role of the diabetic-DOST strategy. Proxy variables such as glycemic status, knowledge gained in the process and quality of life scores on a pilot basis have motivated the investigator further to explore this mode of intervention for a longer period under controlled environmental conditions through multicentric community trial. The whole process provided an opportunity to refine and revise the long-established prejudices and suppositions through shared learning and to look into the sustainability aspect related to diabetic care. The ultimate vision of this exercise is to establish a cadre of informed peer support group for diabetes and to delegate the customary routine care from a single person (physician) to other well informed and motivated persons and consequently promoting the decentralization of health care.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Kaveeshwar SA, Cornwall J. The current state of diabetes mellitus in India. Australas Med J 2014;7:45-8.
Joshi SR, Parikh RM. India – Diabetes capital of the world: Now heading towards hypertension. J Assoc Physicians India 2007;55:323-4.
Deshpande AD, Harris-Hayes M, Schootman M. Epidemiology of diabetes and diabetes-related complications. Phys Ther 2008;88:1254-64.
Diabetes UK. Diabetes is a Massive and Growing Threat to the Health of the Scottish People. Available from: http://www.c3health.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/C3_DIABETES_BOOK_SCOTLAND_FINAL.pdf. [Last cited on 2015 Oct 06].
Didarloo A, Shojaeizadeh D, Gharaaghaji Asl R, Niknami S, Khorami A. Psychosocial correlates of dietary behaviour in type 2 diabetic women, using a behaviour change theory. J Health Popul Nutr 2014;32:335-41.
Harvey JN. Psychosocial interventions for the diabetic patient. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2015;8:29-43.
Kent D, Haas L, Randal D, Lin E, Thorpe CT, Boren SA, et al.
Healthy coping: Issues and implications in diabetes education and care. Popul Health Manag 2010;13:227-33.
Khunti K, Gray LJ, Skinner T, Carey ME, Realf K, Dallosso H, et al.
Effectiveness of a diabetes education and self management programme (DESMOND) for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: Three year follow-up of a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care. BMJ 2012;344:e2333.
Nylander E, Svartholm S. Self care activities of patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 in Ho Chi Minh City. Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences; 2010. Available from: http://www.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:322414/FULLTEXT01.pdf. [Last accessed on 2015 Feb 27].
Uchenna OV, Ijeoma EO, Peace IN, Ngozi KI. Knowledge of diabetes management and control by diabetic patients at federal medical centre Umuahia Abia State, Nigeria. Int J Med Med Sci 2009;1:353-8.
Shrivastava SR, Shrivastava PS, Ramasamy J. Role of self-care in management of diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2013;12:14.
Funnell MM, Brown TL, Childs BP, Haas LB, Hosey GM, Jensen B, et al.
National standards for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care 2010;33 Suppl 1:S89-96.
Importance of Diabetes Education. University of Maryland Medical Center. Available from: http://www.umm.edu/programs/diabetes/health/education/importance-of-diabetes-education. [Last cited on 2015 Feb 27].
Grey M. Coping and diabetes. Diabetes Spectr 2000;13:167.
Shinde M, Joshi A, Arutagi V, Singh D, Khare VS, Pandey P. Visual dynamic e-module as a tool to fulfill informational needs and care continuum for diabetic patients. J Family Med Prim Care 2015;4:310-4.
Dennis CL. Peer support within a health care context: A concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2003;40:321-32.
Heisler M. Overview of peer support models to improve diabetes self-management and clinical outcomes. Diabetes Spectr 2007;20:214.
Zhong X, Wang Z, Fisher EB, Tanasugarn C. Peer support for diabetes management in primary care and community settings in Anhui Province, China. Ann Fam Med 2015;13 Suppl 1:S50-8.
Building Peer Support Programs to Manage Chronic Disease: Seven Models for Success – CHCF. Org. Available from: http://www.chcf.org/publications/2006/12/building-peer-support-programs-to-manage-chronic-disease-seven-models-for-success. [Last cited on 2015 Oct 10].
Wilson W, Pratt C. The impact of diabetes education and peer support upon weight and glycemic control of elderly persons with noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Am J Public Health 1987;77:634-5.
Peer Support Programmes in Diabetes, Report of a WHO Consultation, 5-7 November, 2007. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. p. 41. Available from: http://www.who int/diabetes/publications/Diabetes_final_13_6.pdf. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 20].
Boothroyd RI, Fisher EB. Peers for progress: Promoting peer support for health around the world. Fam Pract 2010;27 Suppl 1:i62-8.
Aswathy S, Unnikrishnan AG, Kalra S, Leelamoni K. Peer support as a strategy for effective management of diabetes in India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2013;17:5-7.
About Near Peer Mentors. Academic Advising, Retention and Diversity. Available from: http://www.drexel.edu/provost/aard/resources-programs/peer-mentoring/faqs/. [Last cited on 2015 Oct 10].
Singh S, Singh N, Dhaliwal U. Near-peer mentoring to complement faculty mentoring of first-year medical students in India. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2014;11:12.
Buyken AE, von Eckardstein A, Schulte H, Cullen P, Assmann G. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of coronary heart disease: Results of the 10-year follow-up of the PROCAM study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2007;14:230-6.
Bonora E, Formentini G, Calcaterra F, Lombardi S, Marini F, Zenari L, et al.
HOMA-estimated insulin resistance is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetic subjects: Prospective data from the Verona Diabetes Complications Study. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1135-41.
Ziegler D. Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy: Clinical manifestations and measurement. Diabetes Rev 1999;7:300-15.
American Diabetes Association and American Academy of Neurology: Report and Recommendations of the San Antonio Conference on Diabetic Neuropathy (Consensus Statement). Diabetes 1988;37:1000-4.
Tunceli K, Bradley CJ, Nerenz D, Williams LK, Pladevall M, Elston Lafata J. The impact of diabetes on employment and work productivity. Diabetes Care 2005;28:2662-7.
Alan M. Delamater, improving patient adherence. Clin Diabetes 2006;24:71-7.
Available from: http://www. Shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/4591/7/07_chapter%202.pdf. [Last accessed on 2016 May 05].
Joshi SR. Glycemic assessment and monitoring an essential tool in modern diabetes management. J Assoc Physicians India 2004;52:775-7.
Funnell MM. Peer-based behavioral strategies to improve chronic disease self-management and clinical outcomes: Evidence, logistics, evaluation considerations and needs for future research. Fam Pract 2010;27 Suppl 1:i17-22.
Heisler M. Different models to mobilize peer support to improve diabetes self-management and clinical outcomes: Evidence, logistics, evaluation considerations and needs for future research. Fam Pract 2010;27 Suppl 1:i23-32.
Perry E, Swartz J, Kelly G, Brown SL, Swartz RD. Palliative care in chronic kidney disease: Peer mentoring program personalizes advance directives discussions. Nephrol News Issues 2003;17:28-31.
Riegel B, Carlson B. Is individual peer support a promising intervention for persons with heart failure? J Cardiovasc Nurs 2004;19:174-83.
Dorgo S, Robinson KM, Bader J. The effectiveness of a peer-mentored older adult fitness program on perceived physical, mental, and social function. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2009;21:116-22.
Sharifirad G, Entezari MH, Kamran A, Azadbakht L. The effectiveness of nutritional education on the knowledge of diabetic patients using the health belief model. J Res Med Sci 2009;14:1-6.
Bayat F, Shojaeezadeh D, Baikpour M, Heshmat R, Baikpour M, Hosseini M. The effects of education based on extended health belief model in type 2 diabetic patients: A randomized controlled trial. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2013;12:45.
Adejoh SO. Diabetes knowledge, health belief, and diabetes management among the Igala, Nigeria. Sage Open 2014;4.
Fulton JP, Buechner JS, Scott HD, DeBuono BA, Feldman JP, Smith RA, et al.
A study guided by the health belief model of the predictors of breast cancer screening of women ages 40 and older. Public Health Rep 1991;106:410-20.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]