World Rural Health Conference
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 1667
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 798-802  

Care management process of breast cancer in primary health-care system, Golestan Province, Iran, 2013–2014


1 Graduated Student, Islamic Azad University, Sari Branch, Sari, Iran
2 Department of Health Services Management, University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

Date of Web Publication15-Feb-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ghahraman Mahmoodi
Department of Health Services Management, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_220_16

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Introduction: Health-care service processes need to be assessed over time. We aimed to assess the breast cancer care process in primary health system of Golestan Province, North Iran. Materials and Methods: To perform a descriptive cross-sectional study, information on breast cancer care processes in primary health-care system was collected using a “collecting form” from 234 health houses, 29 health posts, 44 urban health centers, and 80 rural health centers in Golestan Province. Registered data in the centers and patients' journal were used in data collection. Moreover, we collected data on all women who were diagnosed with breast cancer in 2014 to know the characteristics of the patients. Results: Around 50% of health workers at rural or urban area were trained on breast cancer. Moreover, 2% of women from general population in rural area and around 6% of them in urban area have been trained on breast cancer. Mean age of women diagnosed with breast cancer was 48 ± 10 years and 40.2% of them were affected at age between 43 and 52 years. The results showed that 18.9% of women have received their information through self-study before the diagnosis of breast cancer while 53.8% of them received their information from the private clinics after diagnosis of breast cancer. Conclusion: The process of breast cancer care in Golestan Province needs to be improved in the primary health-care level. Both inter- and multi-disciplinary activities are needed.

Keywords: Breast cancer, care process, health service management, primary health care


How to cite this article:
Hajiebrahimi Z, Mahmoodi G, Abedi G. Care management process of breast cancer in primary health-care system, Golestan Province, Iran, 2013–2014. J Family Med Prim Care 2017;6:798-802

How to cite this URL:
Hajiebrahimi Z, Mahmoodi G, Abedi G. Care management process of breast cancer in primary health-care system, Golestan Province, Iran, 2013–2014. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Dec 8];6:798-802. Available from: http://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2017/6/4/798/225533




  Introduction Top


The main responsibility of health-care systems is disease management.[1] Disease management starts from the point that the diseases have not even exist (preliminary prevention level), continues with controlling the disease ( first prevention level), treating the diseases (secondary prevention level), and reducing the disabilities caused by diseases and rehabilitation (third prevention level). Preliminary and first levels of prevention have a more dominant role in disease management than second and third levels of prevention due to their effects on the population level and higher coverage of population. Training the patients and health providers, establishing the infrastructures, and registering the health information are some of the system strategies to meet their goals in managing the diseases.[2],[3],[4],[5]

Breast cancer is the leading cancer among all women cancers and has the first place in mortality of women due to cancer in the world.[6],[7] Although the disease is known as a frequent cancer in high-income countries, the incidence of breast cancer is increasing in low-/middle-income countries.[8] Mortality of breast cancer declines in high-income countries since 1990s, but it is increasing in low-/middle-income countries.[8] High-income countries have started on controlling breast cancer by training the general population, establishing the screening methods to find the cancer in early stage,[9] and publishing the guidelines [10],[11],[12] to give the same information and the same executive methods to both service providers and service takers. It has been reported that early detection measures and guideline compliant therapy have improved 85% in the last decade in Germany.[2] It has been found that the lack of knowledge is one of the first factors influencing the diagnosis of breast cancer.[3] A study conducted by Fotedar et al.[4] in India has shown that the knowledge level and attitude of the health providers have an important role in breast cancer patients' treatment. Although many low-/middle-income countries have started to train their staffs and use the guidelines in cancer care field, lack of knowledge and lack of adherence to the guidelines are common problems worldwide.[5]

Breast cancer care was included in the primary health-care system in Iran by establishing the screening system (mammography) since 2006.[13] Although the registration of cancer information, including breast cancer, from the primary health-care system and pathologies has been started since many years ago, training the health workers and women at risk in general population and preparing the guidelines for dealing with this cancer have been started since short time ago.

The aim of this descriptive study was to investigate the process of breast cancer care at the preliminary and primary level of prevention in the Golestan Province, North Iran. We checked the process at the patient, executive, and in diagnosis and registration levels.


  Materials and Methods Top


Through a descriptive cross-sectional study, the health system activities in the breast cancer care process were evaluated in Golestan Province, North Iran, in 2013–2014. This study is part of a thesis performed for a master degree in health management field. We used the information from the thesis to describe the health system function in breast cancer care field in the preliminary and primary prevention disease levels. Data collection was performed using a “data collecting form” prepared by authors. It consists of two parts; the general information part including 15 questions and the executive part including 26 questions. All “collecting forms” were filled out by 14 trained persons. To ensure the quality of data collection, 10% of collected data was rechecked using external validators.

To access the executive activities of the health-care system at the preliminary and primary health levels, 234 out of 608 health houses, 29 out of 36 health posts, 44 out of 47 urban health centers, and 80 out of 97 rural health centers in Golestan Province were included in the study. Using systematic random sampling method, samples of health provider centers have been extracted from the list of health provider centers through the province. The samples were allocated to each town based on the proportion of the town health provider centers in the province.

All women who were diagnosed with breast cancer for the first time in 2014 and have been registered in Golestan Breast Cancer Registry were included in the study. Information on the patients was collected from the Golestan Breast Cancer Registry and were completed using patients' journal at the hospitals. Missing information in the registry or in the patients' journals was collected by calling the patients.

Statistical methods

Descriptive statistics (mean, median, and range) were used to describe health-care providers and patients' characteristics. Age at the diagnosis (≤32, 33–42, 43–52, 53–62, and >62 years) and educational level (illiterate, 5 years, 6–8 years, 9–12 years, >12 years) were used as categorical variables in the study. Moreover, residential place of patients at the diagnosis (urban area, rural area) was used as characteristic variable. Kuder–Richardson method was used to estimate the reliability coefficient of the expertise opinion in validation of the “data collecting form.” Ten percent of the samples with 26 questions were piloted to check the reliability of the form. Using Kuder–Richardson method, the coefficient was 93% for both health houses and health posts as well as rural and urban health centers.

All patients were informed about the investigation and verbal consent was obtained. All participants were free to leave the study in any stage of the investigation.


  Results Top


[Table 1] shows the characteristics of health provider centers, educational and executive activities before diagnosis of breast cancer. From all health provider centers in the rural and urban areas, 84.2% of the health houses and 88.9% of health centers in rural area and 100% of health posts and 90.9% of health centers in urban area have filled out the “data collecting form” of the study. The results show that around 50% of health workers at rural or urban area are trained on breast cancer. Our study has, moreover, shown that 2% of women in rural area and around 6% of them in urban area have been trained on breast cancer.
Table 1: Characteristics of health provider centers, educational and executive activities before diagnosis of breast cancer in the centers participated in the study

Click here to view


Characteristics of patients diagnosed with breast cancer at Golestan Province is shown in [Table 2]. The results show that the mean age of women diagnosed with breast cancer is 48 ± 10 years and its range is between 28 and 78 years. We found that 40.2% of women affected by breast cancer when they were at age between 43 and 52 years. The results from our study reveal that 18.2% of women diagnosed with breast cancer are illiterate and 35% of them have educated in <10 years. In training on the breast cancer, the results show that just five women (3.8%) have been invited to participate in the specific training on breast cancer, and one of them (0.8) participated.
Table 2: Characteristics of patients diagnosed with breast cancer at Golestan Province, 2014

Click here to view


[Table 3] shows the information about the process of diagnosis and registration of the patients in Golestan health system. Sixty-one patients (41.2%) have reported “finding a tumor in their breast” as the first sign of the disease while 26 of them (19.7%) have reported the pain as their first sign of the breast cancer. The results indicate that 73 women (55.3%) visited the private physicians when they suspected to the disease. In addition, it was found that 25 women (18.9%) received their information through self-study before the diagnosis of breast cancer while 71 of them (53.8%) received their information from the private clinics after diagnosis of breast cancer.
Table 3: Diagnosis and registration process of breast cancer among women who were diagnosed with breast cancer in 2014

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


In this cross-sectional study to describe the health-care system function in Golestan Province, North Iran, in breast cancer care process field, we found that around half of the health workers in both rural and urban areas have been trained on breast cancer care. Moreover, very small proportion of women have been educated by the health system on breast cancer. Executive activities, for example, preparing the list of high-risk women, referring to health center and receiving the feedback from second level, and data management, have been done in less than half of the health provider centers. Checking for patients' characteristics, we found that the women were frequently diagnosed with breast cancer in 43–52 years of their age and that around 70% of them have educational level <9 years of official education.

Our findings in training field show that 2% of training classes performed by primary health-care system were specifically on breast cancer. Moreover, we found that around 50% of health workers were trained in breast cancer field. Although we did not find any study which considers the number of classes with breast cancer item, our study was consistent with some previous studies which reported the low level of women information on breast cancer.[14],[15],[16] Fazel et al.[14] in a descriptive study among women aged older than 20 years in Sabzevar, Iran, showed that only 35% of women have information about the self-breast examination. Ghazanfaree et al.[15] in a study among the female teachers in Kerman, South Iran, reported that 60% of teachers have low information on breast cancer. Jahan et al.[16] in a study among women aged 20–70 years in Saudi Arabia found that 70% of women have low information on breast cancer. Difference between our results and findings from previous studies could be related to the fact that we used number of classes on breast cancer as a proxy of education in this field, but the previous studies have checked for women information directly.

Finding in executive activities demonstrated that 40% of health houses and health posts have a list to show the women at risk of breast cancer. Since health providers in primary health-care system are obligated to have the list of all women who are between 20 and 69 years of their age based on the Ministry of Health Guideline in Iran,[13] it shows that 60% of health providers in Golestan Province has not achieved the goal yet.

Studying on the characteristics of the patients determines that 63% of women were aged between 33 and 52 years and 40% of them were 43–52 years old, when they were diagnosed with breast cancer. Our finding is consistent with the studies which reported that the age at diagnosis of breast cancer is between 40 and 50 years in Iran, 10 years earlier than the age of diagnosis in developed countries.[17] Furthermore, our results show that more than 53% of women diagnosed with breast cancer in Golestan Province have <10 years of educational level. Getting these two together shows that being younger at the age of diagnosis, worse feature of the disease, lower educational level, and harder to being trained might lead the patients to a worse prognosis. Moreover, it might force the authorities to have a special plan to deal with this problem. This issue makes a worse situation for policymakers in low- or middle-income countries compared with the authorities in high-income countries.

The results show that 15% of health houses and <38% of health posts in the primary health-care system of Golestan Province collected data on the patients' care process. Guidelines of breast cancer screening for health providers [13] emphasize on collecting all data from the breast cancer patients' care in health houses/health posts. We, moreover, found that more than 50% of women visit the physicians in the private sector as the first visit when they suspected to breast cancer. The willingness of patients to visit private sectors instead of public sectors might come from the quality of services provided in private sector. In fact, people prefer to visit the private sectors because these sectors are supposed to provide better services due to higher educated and more skilled personnel and using high-technology equipment. Kumar et al. in a study in India have reported that the public health providers have difficulty to prepare the adequate facilities in their centers.[18] Pandian et al.[19] have found that increasing the number of public health centers, improving the health delivery systems including good infrastructures, and preparing modern diagnostic equipment have changed the perception of people about the public facilities. Our finding is not consistent with other studies from high-income countries which shows that the primary health sector provides better services than the private sector.[20] The difference might originate from people's attitude; preferring private sector to public sector in middle-income countries compared with high-income countries as Ardey and Ardey [21] have mentioned in their study in India on patients' expectation from primary health-care system. Willingness of people to prefer the private sector to public sector could be a target for authorities in their future plan.

Our study has some strengths. This study, based on our knowledge, is the first study taking the breast cancer care process in preliminary and primary prevention levels in consideration in Iran. We focused on different parts of the process and our results can help the health authorities to know the strengths and weaknesses of the system. Moreover, we were not concerned about recall bias due to collecting data from the patients' journal. All data were collected at the time of event and we used them in the study. We had some weaknesses in our study as well. We considered just 1 year of calendar time to show the process function. It is likely that the results could have changed if we would have included a longer time period in the study. We, moreover, did not find any study on the process of care among breast cancer patients in the country to compare our results with other parts of Iran. It seems that more studies should be conducted for more accurate results.


  Conclusion Top


The process of breast cancer care in Golestan Province needs to be improved in the preliminary and primary health-care levels. Some parts of the problem can be solved in the health sector, for example, training the health providers/at-risk women, but some other parts of the problem need multidisciplinary attentions, for example, women's educational level.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the head of the Golestan Province Health Center, the technical deputy of the center, and all the colleagues who participated in the study. Furthermore, we would like to appreciate all efforts from the persons who helped us in collecting data in health centers through Golestan Province and in 5th Azar Hospital, Gorgan.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Raeesi A, Zahraee SM, Sorush najafabadi M, Shirzadi MR, Sedaghat A, Masoumiasl H, et al. Comprehensive Guideline of Communicable Diseases Surveillance System for Family Physician. Daneshmand, Tehran, Iran; 2012.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Schmidt A, Ernstmann N, Wesselmann S, Pfaff H, Wirtz M, Kowalski C. After initial treatment for primary breast cancer: Information needs, health literacy, and the role of health care workers. Support Care Cancer 2016;24:563-71.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Asoogo C, Duma SE. Factors contributing to late breast cancer presentation for health care amongst women in Kumasi, Ghana. Curationis 2015;38:1-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Fotedar V, Seam RK, Gupta MK, Gupta M, Vats S, Verma S. Knowledge of risk factors and early detection methods and practices towards breast cancer among nurses in Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013;14:117-20.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Ortega-Olvera C, Torres-Mejía G, Sánchez-Zamorano LM, Ángeles-Llerenas A, Martínez-Matsushita L, Rojas-Martínez R, et al. Knowledge and recommendations regarding breast cancer early screening in an upper middle income country: Primary and secondary health care professionals. Prev Med 2016;86:147-52.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Bray F, McCarron P, Parkin DM. The changing global patterns of female breast cancer incidence and mortality. Breast Cancer Res 2004;6:229-39.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1. 0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2014.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
WHO. Glob0can. 2012; Available from: http://wwwglobocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx. [Last accessed on 2014 Aug 24].  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Biesheuvel C, Weigel S, Heindel W. Mammography screening: Evidence, history and current practice in germany and other European Countries. Breast Care (Basel) 2011;6:104-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 2002;137 (5 Pt 1):344-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 275 Commerce Drive. Suite 300 Fort Washington, PA 19034 215.690.0300.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:75-89.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Health IMO. Screening and Prevention of Breast Cancer Guideline, For Doctors and Midwifes; 2006.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Fazel N, Akbarzadeh R, Estachi Z, Akaberi A. A study on knowladge and practic of women older than 20 on self examnation test of breast cancer. Iran Seasonal J Breast Cancer Dis 2010;3:49-55.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Ghazanfaree Z, Alemzadeh B, Nikian Y. An investigation on the knowledge and attitude of school teachers in Kerman city about breast self examination (BSE). J Kerman Univ Med Sci 1995;2:76-80.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Jahan S, Al-Saigul AM, Abdelgadir MH. Breast cancer. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of breast self examination among women in Qassim region of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2006;27:1737-41.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Nazal AA, Javadi A, Mahmudbabouee M, Rezaee F, Honardar A. Effect of education in treatment and care of breast cancer in quality of life among outpatinet women in oncological center in Kawsar Hospital- 2011-12. Seasonal J Breast Cancer Dis 2012;5:11.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Kumar P, Khan AM, Anu ID. Provider's constraints and difficulties in primary health care system. J Family Med Prim Care 2014;3:102-6.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
19.
Pandian J, Suresh S, Desikachari BR, Padmanaban P. Increased utilization of primary health care centers for birthing care in Tamil Nadu, India: A visible impact of policies, initiatives, and innovations. J Family Med Prim Care 2013;2:329-33.  Back to cited text no. 19
  [Full text]  
20.
Hollingsworth B. The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery. Health Econ 2008;17:1107-28.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Ardey R, Ardey R. Patient perceptions and expectations from primary health-care providers in India. J Family Med Prim Care 2015;4:53-63.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
   Materials and Me...
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed716    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded78    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal