World Rural Health Conference
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 3946
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 12  |  Page : 3887-3892  

Assessment of respiratory morbidity among bus drivers and conductors of the state road transport corporation, Kochi, Kerala


1 Department of Community Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala, India
2 Department of Public Health Research, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala, India

Date of Submission17-Jul-2019
Date of Decision22-Aug-2019
Date of Acceptance19-Sep-2019
Date of Web Publication10-Dec-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sreelakshmi Mohandas
Department of Community Medicine, AIMS, Ponekkara, Kochi - 682 041, Kerala
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_548_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Introduction: In 2012, 8% of the 2.3 million work-related deaths globally were from chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs). This study was undertaken to estimate the prevalence of respiratory morbidity among the drivers and conductors of the public road transport network in Kochi. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was carried out in the public bus stand (South), Kochi between September 2015 and 2017 among bus drivers and conductors. The interview was conducted among 300 bus drivers and conductors using a locally adapted version of ATS-DLD-78-A questionnaire. Lung function assessment was done using a Mini Wright peak flow meter and a portable spirometer. Data were tabulated using MS Excel and analyzed using SPSS v20. Results: The prevalence of CRD among bus drivers and conductors was found to be 9.97% (95% CI 7.34–14.66) and chronic respiratory symptoms were found to be 19.2% (95% CI 14.58–23.82). On logistic regression, the independent predictors for the CRD were found to be working for more than 15 h/day (OR 2.815, 95% CI 1.26–6.28) and working for more than 4 days/week (OR 2.462, 95% CI 1.12–5.39). Conclusion: CRD exists as a public health problem affecting approximately one in ten bus drivers and conductors in Kochi city. Applying the logical principles of ergonomics by modifying duty hours may be considered.

Keywords: Bronchial asthma, chronic respiratory disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, occupational respiratory morbidity


How to cite this article:
Mohandas S, Francis PT, Rakesh P S, Antony P F. Assessment of respiratory morbidity among bus drivers and conductors of the state road transport corporation, Kochi, Kerala. J Family Med Prim Care 2019;8:3887-92

How to cite this URL:
Mohandas S, Francis PT, Rakesh P S, Antony P F. Assessment of respiratory morbidity among bus drivers and conductors of the state road transport corporation, Kochi, Kerala. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 22];8:3887-92. Available from: http://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2019/8/12/3887/272463




  Introduction Top


Work-related illnesses are on the rise, with globally 2.3 million deaths annually being attributed to work. Around 2 million of this is attributable to work-related disease and 0.3 million owing to occupational injuries.[1] There are several determinants for the health of a worker, including risk factors at the workplace leading to musculoskeletal diseases, respiratory diseases, hearing loss, circulatory diseases, stress-related disorders, cancers, accidents, communicable diseases, and others.[2]

Among the several diseases causing work-related morbidity, chronic respiratory diseases (CRD's) play a major role. CRD's are a group of conditions affecting the airways and other structures of the lung. CRD's caused 7% of the global mortality in 2005.[3] However, the exact global burden of CRDs is not available probably due to the lack of proper surveillance systems in most countries.[4]

The two most common occupation-related CRDs are bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).[3] As per the 2013 statistics reported by the Forum of International Respiratory Societies, the global disease burden of COPD was 200 million and that of bronchial asthma was 235 million.[4] In the year 2000, WHO estimated that 13% of COPD and 11% of asthma globally were due to exposure to risk factors at the workplace.[5] The mortality from bronchial asthma and COPD globally i.e. 38,000 and 318,000 deaths, in the year 2000 were due to occupational airborne exposures.[6]

In India, precise studies are not available to estimate respiratory health-related disease burden. The Survey of Deaths (SSD, 2001–2003) carried out under the domain of Sample Registration System SSD (2001–2003) reported the proportion of deaths contributed by respiratory diseases in the age group above 20 years to be around 20.3%.[7] Among which COPD and asthma contributes to 10.2%.[7]

In a developing country like India, with a lack of adequate chronic disease surveillance systems, there are only limited studies which have looked at occupational airborne exposure and CRD.[8] The transport industry is one of the many professions that have exposure to dust and other airborne particles.[4] With population explosion and the increasing demand to commute, the number of motor vehicles on Indian roads has increased drastically with 10% annual growth in the motor vehicle population. Thirty-two percent of the vehicles in our country are concentrated in metropolitan cities.[9]

Drivers and conductors in the road transport corporation are one such occupational group continuously exposed to urban as well as work-related airborne particles. The current study was undertaken to assess the magnitude of chronic respiratory problems among them and to identify any occupation-related factors associated with it. The findings from the study will aid policymakers to propose targeted interventions to improve the health status of employees working in Kerala State Road Transport Corporation. The information regarding the burden is also valuable to assess the impact of any prevention or control strategies later.


  Methodology Top


A community-based cross-sectional survey was carried out between September 2015 and 2017 in the K.S.R.T.C. South bus stand of Kochi, which is the main depot within the district. The air quality index of Kochi city ranged between 25 and 110 for PM10, indicating a satisfactory index.[10] The study population comprised of K.S.R.T.C employees who were currently working as bus drivers and conductors, for a minimum period of 1 year. Employees with history of chest injuries, chest surgeries, and cardiac disease were excluded from the study considering the possible presence of respiratory symptoms and the possibility of impaired pulmonary function tests in these individuals.

A total of 300 individuals were interviewed. Data collection took place from April to September 2016. A pretested semi-structured questionnaire containing 4 parts (A, B, C, and D) was used to collect information regarding socio-demographic factors, respondent's history, respiratory morbidity, and for pulmonary function assessment. The questions in Section B and C were adapted from the American Thoracic Society's (ATS) Division of Lung Diseases (DLD) Questionnaire referred to as “Recommended Respiratory Disease Questionnaires for Use with Adults and Children in Epidemiological Research”; ATS-DLD-78-A Questionnaire. The questionnaire has been recommended for use in all epidemiological research studies involving participants more than or equal to an age of 13 years as respiratory disease questionnaire and has been designed to assess the prevalence of chronic respiratory symptoms and disease.[11]

Lung function assessment was done using a Mini Wright peak flow meter and a portable spirometer. Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) measurement is usually represented in 3 zones: green- 80–100%, indicating normal; yellow- 50–80% indicating mild obstruction; and red- less than 50% indicating severe disease. It is often used as a tool to assess the severity of asthma, emphysema, and chronic bronchitis. It is expressed in l/min. The measured value for PEFR is compared to the predicted value for PEFR and is expressed as a percentage.[12]

Forced vital capacity (FVC) is frequently measured clinically as an index of pulmonary function.[13] The measured value for FVC was compared to the predicted value for FVC and expressed as a percentage. Values >80% were considered normal.[14] Forced expiratory volume at 1 s, FEV1 is the fraction of vital capacity expired during the first second of forced expiration.[13] The measured value for FEV1 was compared to the predicted value for FEV1 and expressed as a percentage. Values >80% were considered normal.[14]

COPD includes both chronic bronchitis and emphysema.[15] For this study, chronic bronchitis was used for analysis and was based on symptom profile alone. CRD was defined as the presence of a combination of symptoms including that for chronic bronchitis as well as bronchial asthma. Chronic bronchitis was defined as the presence of cough for more than 1-year duration along with episodes of cough and phlegm lasting for 3 weeks or more each year. Bronchial asthma was defined as a disease consisting of a constellation of symptoms;[16] the major symptoms considered for the diagnosis of asthma were the presence of a triad of symptoms- cough, wheezing, and dyspnoea in any person in the study population. Chronic respiratory symptoms were defined as the presence of chronic cough, chronic phlegm, and wheeze.

Data were tabulated using MS Excel and analyzed using SPSS version 20. In total, 95% confidence intervals were calculated. To test the statistical significance of the association of the CRD with various factors, Chi-square test, odds ratio, and backward logistic regression analysis were done. Variables with P value <0.2 in univariate analysis were entered into a backward logistic regression model.

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, India (Ethics committee approval obtained on 30.10.2015).


  Results Top


Details of 291 participants with complete data were included in the final analysis. The mean age of the study participants were 40.6 ± 6.8 years; the age ranged from 26 years to 55 years. All the participants were males and 91.4% of them were married.[Table 1]a.
Table 1: Distribution of study participants according to socio-demographic features and occupational history

Click here to view


The reported use of any tobacco products for smoking was 38.8%. Of the participants who ever smoked, 13.7% were current users and 25.1% were ex-users. Among current users, 47.5% have been smoking for 1–10 years and 5% have been smoking for 31–40 years. A majority of 65.6% of the study participants reported of being exposed to second-hand smoke; 61% of whom were being exposed at the workplace.

Of them, 6.9% of the study participants used any protective masks at the workplace. Among those who used masks, 70% used disposable face masks, 20% used it daily, and 55% used it for less than 2 hours per day.

The occupational history of study participants is depicted in [Table 1]b and the respiratory morbidities in [Table 2].
Table 2: Distribution of study participants according to the prevalence of bronchial asthma, chronic bronchitis, and chronic respiratory disease

Click here to view


The observed PEFR ranged from 210–670 L/min with a mean value of 488.73 ± 88.05 L/min. The observed FEV1 ranged from 1.17–3.73 L/s [13] with a mean value of 2.70 ± 0.42 L/s and the observed FVC ranged from 1.49–4.87 L/s with a mean value of 23.40 ± 4.42 L/s.

The prevalence of the CRD among bus drivers and conductors was found to be 9.97% (95% CI 7.34–14.66) and chronic respiratory symptoms were found to be 19.2% (95% CI 14.58–23.82).

The factors significantly associated with CRDs were working for more than 15 h/day (aOR = 2.815) and working for more than 4 days/week (aOR = 2.462); that for chronic bronchitis was working for more than 15 h/day (aOR = 3.058); for bronchial asthma was the presence of respiratory disease before the age of 18 years (aOR = 4.089); and for chronic respiratory symptoms were absence of a separate kitchen (aOR = 6.929), presence of family history of respiratory disease (aOR = 2.669), and the presence of respiratory disease before the age of 18 years (aOR = 3.270).[Table 3].
Table 3: Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The burden of CRDs is often underestimated because it is usually not diagnosed until it is clinically apparent.[17] In India, there are only a few studies that have looked at the occupation-related respiratory morbidities and most of these studies have been done among industrial workers.[18] The current study was undertaken to measure the prevalence of respiratory morbidities among bus drivers and conductors of Kerala State Road Transport Corporation of Ernakulam South Depot.

In our study, the prevalence of chronic bronchitis as assessed by the American Thoracic Society-Division of Lung Diseases (ATS DLD) questionnaire method was found to be 6.5%. INSEARCH,[19] the multicenter study done in India found the population prevalence of chronic bronchitis to be 4.1%, which is lower than the findings of our study. The same study reported the prevalence of chronic bronchitis among those aged more than 35 years to be 13.5% in Trivandrum, Kerala.[19] In a recently published study by Viswanathan et al., among adults from a rural area of Kollam, Kerala, the prevalence of chronic bronchitis was found to be 6.19% (95% CI 5.76–6.62), with the prevalence among males being 6.73%.[20] This is similar to the findings of our study, 6.5% (95% CI 3.60–9.40).

The prevalence of bronchial asthma varied from 0.74% in rural Mumbai to 4.45% in rural Trivandrum.[19] A study done in rural Kashmir showed an overall prevalence rate of 1.96% for asthma.[21] A cross-sectional study among adults aged ≥35 years of an urban area of Trivandrum revealed a prevalence of 11.5%.[22] The study published by Viswanathan et al., among adults from a rural area of Kollam, the prevalence of bronchial asthma was found to be 2.82% (95% CI 2.52–3.12) with the prevalence of asthma among males being 2.44% (95% CI 2.05–2.85).[20] A study done by Sylla F. K et al. in Senegal found the prevalence of asthma among bus drivers to be 38.8%.[23] Except for the findings in Trivandrum and Senegal, the prevalence of bronchial asthma in our study (4.5%) was found to be higher than other parts of India and Kerala. The mean FEV1 value (2.70 ± 0.42) observed in our study is comparable to the study done among transport bus drivers in Pune in 2016.[24]

The prevalence of CRD in our study was found to be 9.97% (95% CI 7.34–14.66). Although our findings are higher than the prevalence of 6.3% reported by INSEARCH study,[19] it is similar to the prevalence reported by Viswanathan et al.(9.01%) in her study in a rural area of Kollam, Kerala.[20] Hence, it is comparable to the general population prevalence in Kerala. Phase I of INSEARCH study in 4 centers across India reported the prevalence of respiratory symptoms to be 4.3–10.5%.[19] This is similar to our findings of 9.23%. Wheezing was reported by 7.6% rural and 2.5% urban males and dyspnoea on exertion by 14% rural and 6% urban males in Trivandrum.[19]

The Beijing Truck Driver Air Pollution study that compared the exposure to traffic pollution among truck drivers and office workers showed a significant decrease in lung function among truck drivers compared to office workers.[25] A study done by Faisal et al. among non-smoking bus drivers of Hyderabad found a significant reduction in lung function among drivers with >10 years of experience in A.P.S.R.T.C.[8] Although our study showed a higher odds of chronic bronchitis and CRD among those with >10 years of experience, the difference was not statistically significant. The high odds could be due to exposure to diesel exhaust and traffic-related air pollutants with ill effects on health over the years.[26]

Number of working days/week and working hours/day were considered in our study as a proxy for the duration of exposure to traffic pollution. In our study, working for >15 h/day showed 3 times and 2.8 times more risk of developing chronic bronchitis and CRD, respectively than those working for ≤14 h/day, and this was identified as an independent factor associated with chronic bronchitis and CRD. Working for more than 4 days a week was also associated with CRD [Table 3]. Similar findings were observed by Ajay KT et al. in his comparative study among auto drivers and urban residents of Davangere, where he reported that lung functions of auto drivers who are continuously exposed to vehicular emissions are significantly reduced.[27] Similar findings have also been reported by Sylla F. K, in their study among bus drivers.[23] Long durations of exposure to traffic-related air pollution has been identified to be associated with increased risk of chronic respiratory illness.[26] In countries like Europe, there are set standards that define the level under which no major health risks are involved in occupational exposure.[28]

The study looked at symptom profile for identifying and categorizing disease prevalence; hence, the possibility of misclassification cannot be ruled out and spirometric measurements were done on a single day because serial measurements were not possible owing to time and resource constraints. Lack of a comparison group made it difficult to compare the results across various occupational groups. Employees on a long duration of leave were not included in the study, but those on short-term leaves were included. The response rate was 97%, and even if we had included information from the medical certificates the overall prevalence would have been higher than the current prevalence obtained.


  Conclusion Top


Chronic respiratory disease exists as a public health problem affecting approximately one in ten bus drivers and conductors in Kochi city. Globally, only 10–15% of the working population has access to healthcare.[29] This, coupled with the various detrimental environmental and social factors, plays a significant role in further decreasing the health capacity of the working population. Although our study did not point out to a causal relationship between occupation in K.S.R.T.C and respiratory diseases, incorporating screening for chronic respiratory morbidities and history of occupational exposures at the primary care level may help to prevent further progress to chronic lung diseases. This will inadvertently help in improving health care delivery as well as the health profile of the working population in the country. The findings of routine monitoring may help to explore the possibility of applying the logical principles of ergonomics by modifying working time and duty hours per day.

Acknowledgments

The staff of South Bus Stand, Ernakulam and the Department of Community Medicine, AIMS for giving us this opportunity.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Takala J, Hämäläinen P, Saarela KL, Yun LY, Manickam K, Jin TW, et al. Global estimates of the burden of injury and illness at work in 2012. J Occup Environ Hyg 2014;11:326-37.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
WHO | Occupational health [Internet]. WHO. [cited 2017 Jul 24]. Available from: http://www.who.int/topics/occupational_health/en/.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
4.
Ferkol T, Schraufnagel D. The global burden of respiratory disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2014;11:404-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Nelson DI, Concha-Barrientos M, Driscoll T, Steenland K, Fingerhut M, Punnett L, et al. The global burden of selected occupational diseases and injury risks: Methodology and summary. Am J Ind Med 2005;48:400-18.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Driscoll T, Nelson DI, Steenland K, Leigh J, Concha-Barrientos M, Fingerhut M, et al. The global burden of non-malignant respiratory disease due to occupational airborne exposures. Am J Ind Med 2005;48:432-45.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Park K. Park's Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine. 23rd ed. India: Bhanot Publishers; 15 Occupational Health; 2015. p. 803-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Faisal M, Chelluri PE, Singaraju S, GaliJH, Ahmed S, Srinivas P. Environmental and occupational respiratory diseases-spirometric abnormalities in non smoking bus drivers of hyderabad. World Allergy Organ J 2013;6:P61.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Singh SK. Review of urban transportation in India. J Public Transport 2005;8:80-96. Available from: https://www.nctr.usf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/JPT-8-1-Singh.pdf.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Central Pollution Control Board, Ministry of Environment, Forests andClimate Change. National Air Quality Index National Air Quality Index for 175 cities at 416 locations, December 2015 [Internet]. [cited 2019 Mar 28]. Available from: http://cpcb.nic.in/displaypdf.php?id=bWFudWFsLW1vbml0b3JpbmcvQVFJX05BTVBfUmVwX0RlYzIwMTUucGRm.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
ATS DLD 78 A Questionnaire.pdf.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
What You Need to Know About Peak Flow Measurement [Internet]. [cited 2017 Jul 17]. Available from: http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/healthlibrary/test_procedures/pulmonary/peak_flow_measurement_92, P07755/.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Barrett K, Brooks H, Boitano S, Barman S. Ganong's Review of Medical Physiology. 23rd ed. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc; 2010.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Shifren A. The Washington Manual (R)- Pulmonary Medicine Subspeciality Consult. 1st ed. Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006. p. 1-610.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Kasper, Fauci, Hauser, Longo, Jameson, Loscalzo. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 19th ed, vols 1+2.(gnv64).pdf. McGraw-Hill Education, United States; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Ravault C, Kauffmann F. Validity of the IUATLD (1986) questionnaire in the EGEA study. International union against tuberculosis and lung disease. Epidemiological study on the genetics and environment of asthma, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and atopy. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2001;5:191-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Aït-Khaled N, Enarson D, Bousquet J. Chronic respiratory diseases in developing countries: The burden and strategies for prevention and management. Bull World Health Organ 2001;79:971-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Mary E. Assessment of Respiratory Morbidities among Police Personnel in Kochi city, Ernakulam. AchuthaMenon Centre for Health Sciences Studies Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Jindal SK, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, Agarwal R, Kumar R, Kaur T, et al. Indian study on epidemiology of asthma, respiratory symptoms and chronic bronchitis in adults (INSEARCH). Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2012;16:1270-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Viswanathan K, Dharman V, Rakesh PS, Balakrishnan S, Shanavas A. Prevalence of chronic respiratory diseases from a rural area in Kerala, Southern India. Orig Artic [Internet]. Available from: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/indian-journal-of-tuberculosis/. [Last accessed on 2017 Feb 24].  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Qureshi KA. Domestic smoke pollution and prevalence of chronic bronchitis/asthma in a rural area of Kashmir. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 1994;36:61-72.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Epidemiology of obs airway dis.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2017 Aug 10]. Available from: http://medind.nic.in/iac/t00/i2/iact00i2p71o.pdf.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Traffic Air Pollution and Respiratory Health: A Cross-Sectional Study among Bus Drivers in Dakar (Senegal) [Internet]. [cited 2019 Aug 22]. Available from: http://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=81699.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Joshi AR, Vaidya SM, Pimpale N. Study of ventilatory lung function tests of bus drivers in Pune city. Int J Basic Appl Physiol 2017;6:97-102.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Baccarelli AA, Zheng Y, Zhang X, Chang D, Liu L, Wolf KR, et al. Air pollution exposure and lung function in highly exposed subjects in Beijing, China: A repeated-measure study. Bio Med Cent Part Fibre Toxicol 2014;11:51.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Hertel O, Jensen SS, Andersen HV, Palmgren F, Wåhlin P, Skov H, et al. Human exposure to traffic pollution. Experience from Danish studies. Pure Appl Chem 2001;73:137-45.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Ajay KT, Vatsala AR, Prabhuraj, Sangam. Comparative study of PEFR between auto drivers with the residents of urban Davangere. J Pharm Sci Res 2014;6:226-8.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Occupational lung diseases-ERS [Internet]. European Lung white book. [cited 2017 Sep 24]. Available from: http://www.erswhitebook.org/chapters/occupational-lung-diseases/.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Buijs P, Gunnyeon B, van Weel C. Primary health care: What role for occupational health? Br J Gen Pract 2012;62:623-4.  Back to cited text no. 29
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Methodology
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed172    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded30    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal