|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 1730-1734
Comparison of pre-operative and post-operative (varicocelectomy) sperm parameters in patients suffering varicocle with and without reflux in Doppler ultrasonography
Mostafa Babai1, Mohammad Momen Gharibvand2, Mohammad Momeni2, Dinyar Khazaeli3
1 Resident of Radiology, School of Medicine, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Science, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Department of Radiology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Science, Ahvaz, Iran
3 Department of Orology, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Science, Ahvaz, Iran
|Date of Web Publication||31-May-2019|
Dr. Mohammad Momen Gharibvand
Department of Radiology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Science, Ahvaz
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Varicocele can cause progressive testicular damage and infertility. Severe retrograde blood flow to the internal spermatic vein has been suggested as a risk factor for infertility or progressive/stable varicocele. We have aimed to Compared th pre-operative and post-operative (varicocelectomy) sperm parameters in patients suffering varicocle with and without reflux in Doppler ultrasonography. Methods: This descriptive-analytic study was carried out at the Imaging Center of Ahwaz University of Medical Sciences in Imam and Golestan Hospitals. The parameters assessed included the presence or absence of internal spermatic vein reflux in both sided. Patients were divided into three groups based on the presence of testicular reflux: no reflux, left-sided reflux, and both sides reflux. The reflux longer than 1 second was considered pathologic. All patients were also referred to the laboratory for semen analysis, including semen volume, sperm morphology, sperm counts, and motility. Semen analysis was repeated 2 months after varicocelectomy. Results: In this study, a total of 70 patients were evaluated. Forty-three patients (61.4%) did not have any reflux, 23 patients (32.9%) had left testicular reflux, and 4 (5.7%) had reflux in both testicles. Semen volume, number of sperms, number of motile sperm, and sperm morphology increased significantly after Varicocelectomy. We did not find any significant correlation between testicular reflux and improvement index of semen analysis factor was found. Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that the presence of testicular reflux has no effect on semen analysis parameters, but also does not predict the consequences of varicocelectomy and therefore is not a suitable prognosis factor in varicocele patients.
Keywords: Improvement index, semen analysis, testicular vein reflux, varicocelectomy
|How to cite this article:|
Babai M, Gharibvand MM, Momeni M, Khazaeli D. Comparison of pre-operative and post-operative (varicocelectomy) sperm parameters in patients suffering varicocle with and without reflux in Doppler ultrasonography. J Family Med Prim Care 2019;8:1730-4
|How to cite this URL:|
Babai M, Gharibvand MM, Momeni M, Khazaeli D. Comparison of pre-operative and post-operative (varicocelectomy) sperm parameters in patients suffering varicocle with and without reflux in Doppler ultrasonography. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 10];8:1730-4. Available from: http://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2019/8/5/1730/259407
| Introduction|| |
Varicocele is an abnormal tortuosity and dilatation (more than 2 mm) of the spermatic veins and pampiniform plexus, which more found on the left side. Varicocele can cause progressive testicular damage and infertility. It is found in 15–20% of the general population and 35–40% of men who refer to infertility assessment.,, Its standard diagnostic method is clinical examination, but some irregular and asymptomatic patients may need to undergo other diagnostic procedures specially ultrasonography. Varicocele is known as a cause of male infertility, which can be treated with varicocelectomy. Varicocelectomy is the most common treatment option for this purpose, since the results of supportive care are even vague in patients with idiopathic infertility. On the other hand, choosing the right candidate for surgery is also important.
Ultrasonography is a primary modality for the diagnosis of varicocele. The diameter of the vein is measured using B-mode sonography and the venous reflux is also evaluated using Doppler sonography. Color doppler ultrasonography has a sensitivity of 93% and 85%, compared to a physical examination for varicocele detection. Venous reflux (retrograde flow in the testicular vein) is an important criterion for detecting varicocele. It has been reported that the reflux more than 1 second increases the probability of infertility. Also, in recent years, severe retrograde blood flow to the internal spermatic vein has been suggested as a risk factor for infertility or progressive/stable varicocele. Some studies considered the vein dilation alone, and others, reported the co incidence of venous reflux as an important affective factor in sperm production. Due to the observation of reflux in a significant percentage of normal people, some authors suggested the neglecting of the factor. However, there are not enough studies to determine whether the presence or absence of reflux is associated with varicocelectomy outcones. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the parameters of sperm before and after varicocelectomy in patients with or without reflux during Doppler ultrasonography.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This descriptive-analytic study was carried out at the Imaging Center of Ahwaz University of Medical Sciences in Imam and Golestan Hospitals. After approval of the study protocol by the Ahvaz Jundishapour University of Medical Scicens's Ethics Committee, patients with varicocele were enrolled in the study. Consent informed were given to all participants. Patients with secondary varicocele, traumatic injury and other testicular disorders (such as tumors, hydrocele, spermatocell) or testicular inflammation or epididymis were excluded.
The selected patients were initially undergoing gray-scale ultrasound for varicocele and cases with a diameter of more than 2 mm were considered for further evaluation. More assessment were done using color Doppler ultrasound system with multi-frequency linear probe (5–8.5 MHz). Patients were put in supine position and examined by Valsalva maneuver. The parameters assessed included the presence or absence of internal spermatic vein reflux in both sided. The reflux longer than 1 second was considered pathologic. All patients were also referred to the laboratory for semen analysis, including semen volume, sperm morphology, sperm counts and motility. Semen analysis was repeated 2 months after varicocelectomy. Semen analysis was reported according to 1993 WHO guidelines.
Descriptive analysis including mean, standard deviation and frequency for all variables was performed. The comparison of quantitative variables was performed by paired t-test and Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Comparison of proportions was performed using Chi-square test. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 19. P value less than 0.05 considered significant.
| Results|| |
In this study, a total of 70 patients were evaluated. The mean diameter of the right and left side testicular vein at the standing, resting and during Valsalva maneuver was shown in [Table 1]. The sperm analysis factors before and after surgery was shown in [Table 1]. Forty-three patients (61.4%) did not have any reflux, 23 patients (32.9%) had left testicular reflux, and 4 (5.7%) had reflux in both testicles.
Patients were divided into three groups based on the presence of testicular reflux: no reflux, left-sided reflux, and both sides reflux. The diameter of testicular veins was compared in different positions including standing, resting, and during Valsalva maneuver in all three groups. Based on these findings, the left testicular vein diameter at standing, resting, and Valsalva maneuver showed significant differences between the three groups (P = 0.003, P = 0.017, P = 0.005, respectively). The lowest level was seen in patients without reflux and its highest level was seen the simultaneous incidence of reflux in both testicles. However, the right testicular vein diameter did not show any significant difference between the three groups at different position [Table 2].
All parameters studied in semen analysis including semen volume, number of sperms, number of motile sperm and sperm morphology increased significantly after Varicocelectomy [Table 3]. The improvement index (less than 0.5 good recovery, greater than 0.5 worse recovery) in semen analysis factors was compared between the groups. The results showed no significant correlation between testicular reflux and improvement index of semen analysis factor [Table 4].
|Table 3: Comparison of the parameters of semen analysis before and after Varicocelectomy|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
In this study, 70 patients were examined, all of them underwent testicular ultrasonography and sperm analysis before and after surgery. Overall, 43 patients had no Testicular reflux had, 23 patients (32.9%) showed left testicular reflux and both-sided testicular reflux was seen in 4 (5.7%) patients. These findings were in line with studies had done by ultrasound and were relatively less than that performed using venography.,, In studies done by venography, 100% of varicocele patients had reflux, which could be due to more precision of venography, or because of the insertion the catheter tip into the spermatic vein entry, can caused bypassing critical valves.
In the present study, all four evaluated factors thorough semen analysis showed a significant improvement after varicocelectomy. Similarly, in a study conducted by Al Bakri et al., the mean sperm counts were significantly increased after 3-6 months after varicocelectomy. While, they have failed to find any significant improvement in respect of semen volume, motile sperm count, Sperm count, and total sperm motility after surgery. In a study performed by Pogorelić Z et al., The rate of motility, morphology and sperm concentration 6 months after surgery was improved in patients with varicocele grade 1 and 2. In patients with varicocele grade 3, only morphology and sperm concentration were improved, while sperm motility did not change significantly. Varicocele grade was not evaluated in our study. Many studies, including recently published Meta-analyzes, have found that varicocele has a significant effect on semen parameters including count, motility, and sperm morphology.
In this study, there was no correlation between the testicular reflux and semen analysis improvement after varicocelectomy. These findings suggest that the presence of reflux alone does not have prognostic value and could not affect the spermatogenesis. These findings were in line with other previous studies., In the study of Ghafouri et al., There was no association the testicular reflux (less than one-second) semen analysis parameters including all three major criteria (number of sperm, motile sperm, and abnormal morphology), which shows that it could not predict the spermatogenesis changes in patients with varicocele. However, in a study conducted by Tahmasbi et al., A significant relationship between testicular reflux and abnormal semen analysis. They also concluded that the presence of bilateral intravenous reflux or sustained intravenous reflux on each side is an important predictor of the abnormal semen analysis. Also, Mahdavi et al., In contrast to the results of this study, showed that patients with reflux longer than 1 second compared with patients with reflux less than 1 second had a significant differences in terms of semen analysis parameters.
The findings of this study also showed that there is no significant relationship between Semen analysis improvement index and testicular reflux. Also, we have found that the presence of testicular reflex has no effect on treatment response as the results showed no significant differences between patients with or without testicular reflux in terms of semen analysis improvement index. In a study by Alayman F. Hussein in Egypt, improvement index in semen analysis parameters has been compared in patients with testicular reflux at the lower testicle bridge and patients with reflux only in supra-testicular artery. They have found a significantly higher improvement index in patients with anterior bridge reflux. In the present study, we compared the difference in surgical outcomes in patients with and without reflux, in the study of Alayman and colleagues, a comparison was made between surgical outcomes in patients with anterior bridge reflux and patients with reflux in the supra-testicular artery. Hence, the contrary with our results, could be due to the differences in study protocol.
Overall, the findings of this study indicate that the presence of testicular reflux has no effect on semen analysis parameters, but also does not predict the consequences of varicocelectomy and therefore is not a suitable prognosis factor in varicocele patients.
All procedures have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed inaccordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Informed consent was signed prior to participation in the study.
We wish to thank all our colleagues in Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Masson P, Brannigan RE. The varicocele. Urol Clin 2014;41:129-44.
Fretz PC, Sandlow JI. Varicocele: Current concepts in pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Urol Clin North Am 2002;29:921-37.
Clarke B. Incidence of varicocele in normal men and among men of different ages. JAMA 1966;198:1121-2.
Keoghane S, Kabala J. Varicocele embolisation. Imaging 2001;13:11-7.
Mahdavi A, Heidari R, Khezri M, Shiravi A, Pirjani R, Kashaf RS. Can ultrasound findings be a good predictor of sperm parameters in patients with varicocele? A cross-sectional study. Nephrourol Mon 2016;8e37103.
Chiou RK, Anderson JC, Wobig RK, Rosinsky DE, Matamoros A Jr, Chen WS, et al
. Color Doppler ultrasound criteria to diagnose varicoceles: Correlation of a new scoring system with physical examination. Urology 1997;50:953-6.
Mihmanli I, Kurugoglu S, Cantasdemir M, Zulfikar Z, Yilmaz MH, Numan F. Color Doppler ultrasound in subclinical varicocele: An attempt to determine new criteria. Eur J Ultrasound 2000;12:43-8.
Zampieri N, Cervellione RM. Varicocele in adolescents: A 6-year longitudinal and followup observational study. J Urology 2008;180:1653-6.
Hirsh AV, Cameron KM, Yyler JP, Simpson J, Pryor JP. The doppler assessment of varisoceles and internal spermatic vein reflux in infertile men. Br J Urol 1980; 52:50-6.
World Health Organization (No author listed). The influence of varicocele on parameters of fertility in large group of men presenting to infertility clinics. Fertil Steril 1992;57:1289-93.
Marsman JW. Clinical versus subclinical varicocele: Venographic finding and improvement of fertility after embolization. Radiology 1985;155:635-8.
Al Bakri A, Lo K, Grober E, Cassidy D, Cardoso JP, Jarvi K. Time for improvement in semen parameters after varicocelectomy. J Urology 2012;187:227-31.
Perimenis P, Markou S, Gyftopoulos K, Athanasopoulos A, Barbalias G. Effect of subinguinal varicocelectomy on sperm parameters and pregnancy rate: A two–group study. Eur Urol 2001;39:322-5.
Agarwal A, Sharma R, Harlev A, Esteves SC. Effect of varicocele on semen characteristics according to the new 2010 World Health Organization criteria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl 2016;18:163-70.
] [Full text]
Ghafoori M, Rostampour A. Evaluation of the relation of diameter and reflux to sperm analysis in varicocele patients in Hashemi Nejad hospital in the year 2003. Razi J Med Sci 2006;13:157-64.
Morteza T, Ehsan A. Quantitative doppler assessment of flow characteristics in pampiniform venous plexus, in patients with varicocele: Is there any relationship with semen analysis? PJR 2016;20:121-4.
Hussein AF. The role of color Doppler ultrasound in prediction of the outcome of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy. J Urol 2006;176:2141-5.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]