World Rural Health Conference
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 1051
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 2101-2105  

A cross-sectional study to screen community health volunteers for hip/knee-osteoarthritis and osteoporosis


1 Department of Community Medicine, Hinduhridaysamrat Balasaheb Thackeray Medical College and Dr. Rustom Narsi Cooper Municipal General Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Community Medicine, King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission29-Mar-2019
Date of Decision30-Mar-2019
Date of Acceptance19-Apr-2019
Date of Web Publication26-Jun-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Rujuta S Hadaye
Department of Community Medicine, Library Building-3rd Floor, Seth GSMC and KEM Hospital, Acharya Dhonde Marg, Parel, Mumbai - 400 012, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_261_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Context: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease mainly affecting hip and knee joints, and osteoporosis is characterized by diminution of bone mass. Both these diseases have a substantial economic impact on society. Community health volunteers (CHVs) being peripheral health workers are prone to such diseases owing to their sociodemographic and occupational profile. Aim: This study was conducted to estimate the proportion of hip/knee OA and osteoporosis among CHVs and understand determinants of their current bone health status. Materials and Methods: Screening for OA was done using a tool adopted from a previous study after obtaining due permissions. Weight, height, blood pressure, and bone mineral density of all participants were recorded. Statistical tests such as Chi-square and multiple logistic regression were used for analysis of data. Results: Out of 80 participants, 50 (62.5%) had increased body mass index (overweight + obese), 10 (12.5%) were hypertensive, 14 (17.5%) CHVs screened positive for hip OA, and 29 (36.3%) were positive for knee OA. Hip OA was associated with advancing age, parity, and obesity. Knee OA was associated with age and exercise. In total, 16.3% subjects were found to have osteoporosis and 61.2% had osteopenia. Conclusions: This study showed that a remarkable proportion of CHVs had bone and joint problems. CHVs must, therefore, receive preventive measures such as health education and screening for these diseases.

Keywords: Bone mineral density, Community Health Volunteers, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis


How to cite this article:
Gokhale CN, Simon SS, Hadaye RS, Lavangare SR. A cross-sectional study to screen community health volunteers for hip/knee-osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. J Family Med Prim Care 2019;8:2101-5

How to cite this URL:
Gokhale CN, Simon SS, Hadaye RS, Lavangare SR. A cross-sectional study to screen community health volunteers for hip/knee-osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Jul 19];8:2101-5. Available from: http://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2019/8/6/2101/261395




  Introduction Top


Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease that affects the knee and hip joint more frequently. The economic impact of the disease is substantial and is on the rise.[1] According to a study conducted on the NHWS, USA data of 2009, the mean annual unadjusted health cost incurred by workers suffering from pain due to OA was almost double than the cost incurred by the comparator group.[2] According to Oxford Economics, the direct cost of arthritis (both RA and OA) in UK for the year 2008 was 6.1 billion pounds.[3] As estimated by Global burden of Osteoarthritis, 14,230 DALYs including 2254 DALYs from SEARO-D region (that included data from India) were lost due to OA.[4] The above figures emphasize upon the fact that OA may be considered as an important public health problem. Osteoporosis causes diminution of bone mass without detectable changes in the ratio of mineralized to nonmineralized matrix. On the basis of the World Health Organization (WHO) definition, it is estimated that >30% of women >50 years of age suffer from osteoporosis.[5]

Community health volunteers (CHVs) are peripheral health workers working under various municipal wards. They are front-line health workers with job responsibilities of conducting surveys and home visits for beneficiaries such as pregnant/lactating women, under-five children, tuberculosis patients, etc., They are required to keep manual records of their outreach work which involves sitting at a desk or on the floor for long hours. They predominantly belong to a lower socioeconomic stratum and have minimum access to advanced screening, diagnostic, and treatment procedures.

A review of studies related to osteoporosis published in 2015 showed that osteopenia among Indian women varied from 29% to 53%. This proportion may be as high as 62% in postmenopausal women. Similarly, the prevalence of osteoporosis among Indian women also varied from 8% to 44%, as was reported by various studies conducted across the country.[6] As per an article published on proportions of OA among Indians, it was shown that 11% of women had OA in the Indian state of Maharashtra where this study was carried out.[7] All CHVs being women are vulnerable to bone and joint problems, which may cause discomfort in their job. Also, very few previous studies could be found, which were carried on peripheral health workers for OA and osteoporosis. Hence, this study was planned on CHVs to estimate the proportion of hip/knee OA and osteoporosis and look for determinants of their bone/joint health status.


  Subjects and Methods Top


This study was planned in the urban field practice area of a teaching college in Mumbai. The study participants included CHVs of a municipal ward of Mumbai. The municipal ward has seven health posts. Out of these, five health posts were randomly selected. The total number of CHVs employed under these five health posts was 96. About 16 out of these 96 CHVs did not take part in this study as they had duties elsewhere. Hence, the final sample size for this study was 80. After taking consent from all participants, a preformed validated questionnaire was used to obtain information from the study participants. The questionnaire included a screening tool for OA taken from a previous study after due permissions.[1] Questions in the screening tool were modified to suit the local lifestyle [Figure 1]. Weight, height, and blood pressure of the study participants were recorded using the standard instruments. Bone mineral density at the level of ankle (right side for uniformity) was measured using a DEXA scan machine, and T-score, thus, obtained was recorded.
Figure 1: Screening tool used for hip/knee osteoarthritis[1]

Click here to view


Operational Definitions used in this study:

  1. Body mass index (BMI) was classified into normal, overweight, and obese as per WHO definition.[8]
  2. On the basis of blood pressure, subjects were classified into hypertensive and normotensive as JNC-7 classification. Besides, if there was a history of treatment for higher blood pressure, such a subject was also considered as hypertensive for this study.[9]
  3. Osteoporosis was classified as per WHO definition on the basis of T-score.[10]
  4. [Figure 2] demonstrates strategy for inferences from the screening tool.
Figure 2: Inference strategy for hip/knee OA screening tool

Click here to view



  Results Top


Out of the 80 CHVs who took part in this study, 57 (61.3%) were between 30 and 59 years and 12 (15%) were more than 60-year old. About 59 CHVs (73.7%) had up to two children, whereas the rest had three or more children.

It was seen that 14 participants (17.5%) were screened positive for hip OA [Table 1]a. On applying the screening tool for knee joint problems, 29 CHVs (36.3%) were found positive for knee OA [Table 1]b.


Click here to view


More than 60% of CHVs had BMI higher than the upper normal limit. Also, 12.5% participants were classified as hypertensive [Table 2]. When asked about their lifestyle, it was found that only 23 out of 80 participants exercised regularly. Out of the 23, 19 participants exercised ≥5 days/week (as recommended), but only eight participants exercised for the recommended time of >30 min/day.
Table 2: Distribution of body mass index (BMI) and blood pressure (BP)

Click here to view


Bivariate analysis was done using Chi-square or Fischer exact test and multivariate analysis using multiple logistic regression [Table 3]. The proportion of CHVs screened positive for hip OA increased with age. Parity was significantly associated (P = 0.042) with hip OA. Participants with higher BMI were more likely to be screened positive. Surprisingly, the proportion of hip OA was higher among participants who gave history of doing exercises.
Table 3: Bivariate and multivariate analysis for hip and knee OA (bivariate analysis using Chi-square/Fischer Exact test and multivariate analysis using multiple logistic regression)

Click here to view


Increasing age of participant was significantly associated (P = 0.001) with chances of developing knee OA. Participants with higher BMI (overweight and obese category) and with higher parity had more chances of developing knee OA. In this study, it was found that participants who exercised regularly were protected from developing knee OA (P = 0.01).

Multivariate analysis showed that for hip OA, age between 30 and 59 years, parity of three to five children, overweight/obese as per BMI, and history of doing exercises had higher odds of being screened positive. CHVs with normal blood pressure were protected against hip OA. Similarly, for knee OA, age between 30 and 59 years, higher BMI, and higher parity were determinants with higher odds ratio for being positive in the screening test. Again the participants having normal blood pressure were protected.

Thirteen participants (16.3%) had osteoporosis and another 49 CHVs (61.2%) were having osteopenia. The T-score distribution [Figure 3] shows that most of the study participants were concentrated around the line representing T-score of −1 (cutoff between normal and osteopenia). Most people with normal score had values between 0 and −1, i.e. they were inclined toward the lower limit of normal category.
Figure 3: Distribution of T-score of study participants

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Bone and joint diseases, though on the rise, are neglected public health problems. In a background paper on OA by the WHO, it was concluded that there is a large burden of OA and absence of effective biomarkers and diagnostics one of the main reasons.[11] Varthakavi et al. concluded that osteoporosis was a neglected health problem in India and lack of detection and unawareness were the main reasons.[12] Hence, previous published literatures support the fact that these diseases may go undiagnosed and thereby untreated in many patients. The primary care givers such as family physicians can detect these diseases early with use of cost-effective screening tools. Peripheral health workers such as CHVs deserve priority screening as they are responsible for overlooking the health of the community.

This study showed that advancing age, higher parity, and positive history of exercise were major determinants for hip OA. Exercise is generally labeled as protective against OA. An inverse relation may have occurred as a result of inappropriate exercise choices or even more likely due to a minuscule number of participants giving history of undertaking regular exercise. Regression analysis showed that the age group of 30–59 years had odds of 3.04 for hip OA. These findings are similar to an overview of hip OA done by Jotanovic et al. in which they found that advancing age was one of the significant factors influencing hip OA.[13] Hip OA was also associated with increase in BMI (odds of 7.6 for overweight and 6.8 for obese group). These findings are consistent with a previous study conducted by Sharma et al.[14]

Advancing age was also significantly associated with knee OA (odds = 20.78, P = 0.016). In a previous study, Pal et al. also found that advancing age was significantly associated with knee OA.[15] Participants with higher parity had 1.33 times more chance of a positive screening result. Pregnancy-related weight gain may be a likely cause for this association. Wise et al. also reported a similar association between parity and knee OA.[16] Overweight and obese individuals were more likely to have positive result for knee OA. Pal et al. also found a statistically significant association between BMI and knee OA.[15] High BP is normally considered as a risk factor for OA of knee joint, but here an inverse relation was seen.

About 16.3% of the study participants were found to have osteoporosis and 61.2% had osteopenia. Kadam et al. reported similar findings with proportion of osteoporosis 18% when checked at the level of lumbar spine and 12.7% at the level of hip. However, the proportion of osteopenia was much less in that study (21.6% at lumbar spine level and 44.8% at hip level.)[17] In another study conducted on women >40 years of age, it was found that 8% had osteoporosis and 34% had osteopenia. Though this study also included younger participants, still the proportions are much higher than the previous study.[18]

The diseases, OA and osteoporosis, may have negative impact on routine activities of CHVs affecting both quantity as well as quality of the work that comprises of delivery of healthcare services at the grass-root level. CHVs, therefore, must be trained and sensitized about OA and osteoporosis and also educated about related issues such as weight reduction, exercise, and regular blood pressure monitoring. This study also calls for regular screening for peripheral health workers and adequate treatment for those who screen positive. Such studies may be repeated in similar as well as different study settings as such endeavours aid in raising awareness regarding such kinds of neglected noncommunicable diseases and may also help in detection of the latent cases.


  Conclusions Top


In this study, 17.5% CHVs screened positive for hip OA and 36.3% for knee OA. Advancing age, higher parity, and higher values for BMI were major determinants for both hip and knee OA. Bone mineral densitometry showed that more than three-fourth of participants had low levels (61.2% osteopenia and 16.3% osteoporosis) and these problems were more severe as compared with previous studies. In summary, CHVs are at a high risk of developing problems, such as hip/knee OA and osteoporosis, in addition to other health problems, such as higher levels of BMI and blood pressure.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Public Health Department, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), who permitted the health volunteers to participate in this study. We also acknowledge all people who contributed in the process of data collection including the process of bone mineral densitometry.

Financial support and sponsorship

The Bone Mineral Densitometry carried out in this study was funded by Gosumec Alumni Association, Seth G. S. Medical College and K.E.M. Hospital, Mumbai.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Morvan J, Roux CH, Fautrel B, Rat AC, Euller-Ziegler L, Loeuille D, et al. A case-control study to assess sensitivity and specificity of a questionnaire for the detection of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2009;61:92-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Di Bonaventura, Gupta S, McDonald M, Sadosky A. Evaluating the health and economic impact of osteoarthritis pain in the workforce: Results from the National Health and Wellness Survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011;12:83.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Oxford Economics. The economic costs of arthritis for UK economy. Final Report 2010. Available from: https://www.oxfordeconomics.com/publication/download/222531. Last accessed on 2018 Sep 07].  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Symmons D, Mathers C, Pfleger B. Global burden of Osteoarthritis in the year 2000. Global Burden of Disease 2000, Draft 15-08-06. Available from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/bod_osteoarthritis.pdf. Last accessed on 2018 Sep 07].  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedell H. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 1996;312:1254-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Khadilkar AV, Mandlik RM. Epidemiology and treatment of osteoporosis in women: An Indian perspective. Int J Women's Health 2015:7:841-50.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Azad CS, Singh AK, Pandey P, Singh M, Chaudhary P, Tia N, et al. Osteoarthritis in India: An epidemiologic aspect. Int J Recent Scientific Res 2017;8:20918-22.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. WHO technical series 894. Geneva; 2000. Available from: http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/obesity/WHO_TRS_894/en/. Last accessed on 2018 Sep 06].  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
US department of health and human services, National Institutes of Health, National heart, lung and blood institute. The seventh report of JNC on prevention, detection, evaluation and treatment of high Blood Pressure. NIH Publication No. 03-5233, December-2003. Last accessed on 2018 Sep 01]. Available from: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/files/docs/guidelines/jnc7full.pdf.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
World Health Organization. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for post menopausal osteoporosis: Report of a WHO study group. WHO technical series 843. Geneva; 1994. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/39142. [Last accessed on 2018 Sep 01].  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Wittenauer R, Smith L, Aden K. Background Paper 6.12 Osteoarthritis. Priority Medicines for Europe and the World “A Public Health Approach to Innovation” Update on 2004 background paper, January 28th 2013. World Health Organization. Available from: https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/priority_medicines/BP6_12Osteo.pdf. Last accessed on 2019 Apr 05].  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Varthakavi PK, Joshi AS, Bhagwat NM, Chadha MD. Osteoporosis treatment in India: Call for action. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2014;18:441-2.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Jotanovic Z, Mihelic R, Gulan G, Sestan B, Dembic Z. Osteoarthritis of the hip: An overview. Periodicum Biologorum 2015;117:95-108.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Sharma MK, Swami HM, Bhatia V, Verma A, Bhatia SPS, Kaur G. An epidemiological study of correlates of osteo-arthritis in geriatric population of UT Chandigarh. Indian J Community Med 2007;32:77-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
  [Full text]  
15.
Pal CP, Singh P, Chaturvedi S, Pruthi KK, Vij A. Epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis in India and related factors. Indian J Orthop 2016;50:518-22.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
16.
Wise BL, Niu J, Zhang Y, Felson D, Bradley LA, Segal N, et al. The association of parity with osteoarthritis and knee replacement in the multicenter osteoarthritis study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013;21:1849-54.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kadam NS, Chiplonkar SA, Khadilkar AV, Khadilkar VV. Prevalence of osteoporosis in apparently healthy adults above 40 years of age in Pune city, India. Indian J Endocr Metab 2018;22:67-73.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
18.
Gandhi AB, Shukla AKR. Evaluation of BMD of women above 40 years of age. J Obstet Gynecol India 2005;55:265-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Subjects and Methods
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusions
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed41    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded7    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal