World Rural Health Conference
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 383
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 8  |  Page : 2628-2632  

Sleep hygiene awareness: Its relation to sleep quality among medical students in King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia


1 Assistant Consultant, Family Medicine Department, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2 Professor and Consultant, Family Medicine, College of Medicine - King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Date of Submission02-May-2019
Date of Decision09-May-2019
Date of Acceptance22-May-2019
Date of Web Publication28-Aug-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Mohsin Alshahrani
Assistant Consultant, Family Medicine Department, Ministry of Health, Riyadh
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_359_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background/Objective: Sleep hygiene (SH) is considered to be an effective method to treat sleep disturbances, especially among adolescents and young adults. This study aimed to find out the relationship of SH awareness and its importance in overall sleep quality among medical students and to assess the prevalence of sleep disturbance among them. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the College of Medicine, King Saud University during the period between April and July 2016. A total of 225 students participated in this study and were recruited by a convenience sampling method. Two validated questionnaires were used, Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) to assess sleep quality and the Sleep Beliefs Scale (SBS) to assess the awareness of students about SH. Data were entered into, and analyzed by SPSS Version 20. Results: Overall, more than half of the participants, 113 (56.5%), had a poor sleep quality. Sixty one (30.5%) students got excellent score in SH awareness and the rest of the participants (n = 139; 69.5%) scored poor/intermediate. Thirty-five (57.4%) poor sleepers and 42.6% of good sleepers scored excellent in SH awareness. Conclusion: This study showed a higher prevalence of sleep disturbance among medical students and no significant correlation between SH awareness and good sleep quality, which means that SH awareness may not necessarily ensure a good sleep quality.

Keywords: Medical students, sleep hygiene awareness, sleep quality


How to cite this article:
Alshahrani M, Al Turki Y. Sleep hygiene awareness: Its relation to sleep quality among medical students in King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Family Med Prim Care 2019;8:2628-32

How to cite this URL:
Alshahrani M, Al Turki Y. Sleep hygiene awareness: Its relation to sleep quality among medical students in King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Sep 19];8:2628-32. Available from: http://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2019/8/8/2628/265575




  Background Top


In Saudi Arabia, sleep medicine is undergoing a development stage, especially in researches that are conducted to find out the relationship between sleep quality and the reasons that cause sleep disturbances.

Systematic efforts are needed to take control of the identified barriers and challenges to the improvement of sleep medicine in Saudi Arabia.[1] By conducting the present study, we would like to offer an added value to this area by focusing on research in one aspect of sleep medicine field, that is, studying the relationship between sleep hygiene (SH) awareness and sleep quality in a sample of medical students in King Saud University.

In recent years, there has been an increased interest and concern on poor sleep habit, which plays a major role in sleep disturbance. SH refers to a set of life behaviors that promote a good sleep quality. These habits are correlated with food stimuli, smoking, mental effort, and also to the individuals' surrounding area during sleeping.[2]

Researches have proven multiple factors that lead to sleep disorders. Some factors are about organic illnesses, while others are about mental ones. Also, there are factors about sleep habits which play a major role in insomnia.[3]

SH has become a common tool for health providers in the treatment of insomnia. It was found that taking healthy sleep habits seriously would be a strong support to treat chronic insomnia.[3],[4] SH has been reported to be functional in adolescents and young adults, possibly because their sleep knowledge and practice are poor.[5],[6],[7]

University students undergo an important stage in their lives as most of them have irregular sleep. Moreover, some of them have negative habits that may affect their sleep quality. Also, some of them may not have a sufficient knowledge of the patterns of a proper healthy sleep. Students are known for insufficient and poor quality of sleep and for irregular sleep habits, such as sleeping less during the week and longer during the weekends.[8],[9],[10] Students seem to be unaware of the negative effects of sleep deprivation, such as its effects on psychological well-being[11] and academic performance.[12],[13]

The relationships between main features of good SH in adolescents and its recognizable outcomes have not been studied in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, this study intends to explore this relationship and find out its importance in overall sleep quality. This study aimed to find out the relationship of SH awareness and its importance in overall sleep quality among medical students and to know the prevalence of sleep disturbance among them. The hypothesis was that a better SH awareness would yield a better sleep quality.


  Methodology Top


Participants and procedures

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Medicine College in King Saud University (KSU) on Thursday, 4th June, 2015 (Research Project No. E-15-1564).

Study participants in this cross-sectional study were recruited from students in the College of Medicine in KSU during the period between April and July 2016. Only male students were included in all study years.

Convenience sampling technique was used with a confidence level of 95% and a margin of error of 6%. At α (level of significance) 0.05 with estimated percent of sleeping disturbance 0.7 (as in Abdulghani, Hamza M.et al. “Sleep disorder among medical students: relationship to their academic performance”),[14] the sample size should be at least 225.

Two validated questionnaires were used in this study that was distributed by volunteers to the students in their lecture rooms and to the attendant students at the primary care clinics in King Khalid University Hospital. The time that was needed to complete both questionnaires was approximately 10 min after which the volunteers collected the questionnaires.

Study instruments:

The questionnaire consisted of three sections:

A brief introduction about the nature of research, ethical requirements for confidentiality, and voluntary participation.

The Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a self-rating questionnaire that assesses sleep quality and disturbances during the preceding month. This instrument comprises 19 individual items and yields an overall score ranging from 0 to 21. Participants who score higher than 5 are considered poor sleepers. It differentiates “poor” from “good” sleep by measuring seven domains: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction over the last month.[15]

The sleep belief scale (SBS), a 20-items reviewed version of the SH awareness by Lacks and Rotert. The (SBS) revealed the awareness regarding the knowledge of the subject in relationship to the influence on sleep of drug consumption (alcohol, caffeine, nicotine, sleep medication), diurnal behaviors (physical exercise and naps), and activities and thoughts previous to sleep (eating, studying, relaxing, worries) recording positive, negative, or neither effect on sleep.[16] Correct answering corresponds to a negative effect for all the items except numbers 5, 9, 15, and 19 (which have a positive effect). Correct answers were calculated as one point and incorrect ones (including all answers of neither effect) were calculated as zero. The possible scores range from 0 to 20, and the participants who got the score in the range of 0--5 were classified as having a poor awareness, 6--13 as having an intermediate, and 14--20 as having an excellent awareness. From the reliability study, average Cronbach's α was found to be 0.751. The data was collected and verified and then coded before entry. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 20.0.0 was used for data entry and analysis. Descriptive statistics (e.g., number, percentage) and analytical statistics using Chi-square tests (χ2) were used to test for the difference between two categorical variables. P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


  Results Top


Among the 225 respondents in the study, 18 students did not complete the PSQI survey and 7 students did not complete the SBS questionnaire. The results showed that 113 (56.5%) of the participants had a PSQI score higher than 5 which means that they had a poor sleep quality.

[Table 1] shows the distribution of the respondents according to their sleep beliefs and PSQI scores. Sixty-one (30.5%) participants got an excellent score in SH awareness, whereas 139 (69.5%) students got intermediate/poor scores. However, 35 poor sleepers (57.4%) and 26 good sleepers (42.6%) had excellent SH awareness. We found that there was no statistically significant relation between the sleep beliefs and the global PSQI since the P value was more than 0.05.
Table 1: Distribution of the respondents according to their sleep beliefs and PSQI scores

Click here to view


[Table 2] shows the distribution of the respondents according to various sleep disturbances. Forty-two students (18.8%) had a problem of sleep latency three times or more a week, followed by 28 students (12.6%) who had night time dysfunction (waking up in the middle of the night or early morning). During the month preceding the survey, only six students (2.7%) reported using sleep medications once or more a week. Also, when we made assessment limited to a component item that measured self-report of poor sleep quality, only 61 students (27.6%) specifically stated that their sleep quality was fairly bad or very bad.
Table 2: The distribution of the respondents according to various sleep disturbances

Click here to view


[Table 3] shows the distribution of the respondents having correct answers according to SBS. Over two-thirds of the participants (69.3%) had a good knowledge about the negative effects of drinking coffee or other substances with caffeine before sleeping. Moreover, about 67% of the participants were aware that taking a long nap during the day would affect sleep badly. The majority of the participants have chosen correct answers about positive effects of going to bed and waking up always at the same hour (57.8%), diverting one's attention and relaxing before bedtime (53.3%), and sleeping in a quiet and dark room (79.1%). Of note, 69.8% of the students had a misconception about the effect of recovering lost sleep by sleeping for a long time.
Table 3: The distribution of respondents having correct answers according to Sleep Belief Scale

Click here to view


[Table 4] shows the comparison of PSQI groups (≤5 and >5) according to correct answers using independent samples t- test. The mean for PSQI ≤5 was 10.3 ± 5.1, whereas the mean for PSQI >5 was 10.1 ± 4.98. However, the t-test showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P value = 0.764).
Table 4: Comparison of PSQI groups (≤ 5 and >5) according to correct answers using independent samples T test

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The results of this study revealed that poor quality of sleep was relatively high (56.5% of the students) and the mean score of PSQI was 10.07 (S.D 4.98) [See [Table 4]. This result is consistent with the results of a previous study conducted among medical students at KSU in 2009.[14] This estimated score is also consistent with the average of poor pattern of sleep in Iran,[17] Hong Kong,[18] and Romania.[19]

Regarding the SH awareness, the results of the present study revealed that the level of knowledge about sleep beliefs was moderate. The mean score of the respondents was 10.49 (S.D 4.64). These results are consistent with the level of awareness in studies in Ethiopia[20] and Hong Kong,[18] while it is not in accordance with the results of a study that measured the SH awareness among students in Italy and Spain which revealed a good awareness.[15] Of note, the percentage of respondents having good knowledge about negative effects of drinking coffee or other substances is similar to those in a study conducted in Romania.[19] In contrast to the results of this study, most of the respondents of the study conducted in Italy and Spain could identify that sleep is impaired by recovering lost sleep by sleeping longer.[15]

The findings of this study regarding negative effects of using sleep medications regularly, studying in bed, smoking, and drinking alcohol in the evening were compatible with the results of a study conducted in Romania,[19] but incompatible with the results of studies conducted in the United States.[5],[21] One possible explanation is that cultural factors may have affected the SH awareness among different countries.

With regard to the association between SH awareness and sleep quality, this study revealed no strong relation between them. Approximately half of the poor sleepers had an inadequate level of SH awareness and, on the other hand, half of good sleepers had the same level of awareness.

Limitation of the study

Some limitations of this study needs to be discussed to complete the understanding of the results. First, the sample of this survey was limited to male students and did not include female students because of the difficulty of reaching them and allocating our questionnaires (matter of accessibility). Indeed, their inclusion in the sample reinforces the knowledge of the probability of clear differences between both genders. Secondly, this study did not have a unique scale that could precisely measure healthy sleep habits among the participants. However, this study was only limited to measuring how some sleep habits would affect sleeping according to the participants' beliefs.


  Conclusion Top


Within the limitations of this study, the percentage of students who has a poor sleep quality was relatively high as more than half of the participants (56.5%) suffered sleep disturbances. Moreover, the majority of the participants (almost two-thirds) scored unsatisfactory results (intermediate, poor) for the awareness of SH. When comparing sleep quality to the SH awareness, no significant correlation was found.

Therefore, the awareness of SH may not necessarily guarantee a good healthy sleep.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Mr. Nassr AlMaflehi (Bio-Statistician) for his contribution in data analysis.

Ethical considerations

An ethical approval was taken from the Institutional Review Board in King Khalid University Hospital after a proposal was submitted addressing all the aspects of the study which was reviewed by the ethical committee. An informed verbal consent was taken from every respondent with the explanation of the questionnaire and permission was granted before distribution of the questionnaire. Confidentiality of information collected from research participants was maintained and only the investigator had the access to identify the responses of individual subjects.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Bahammam A, Alsaeed M, AlAhmari M, AlBalawi I, Sharif M. Sleep medicine services in Saudi Arabia: The 2013 national survey. Ann Thorac Med2014;9:45-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
2.
Stepanski EJ, Wyatt J. Use of sleep hygiene in the treatment of insomnia. Sleep Med Rev 2003;7:215-25.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Morin C, Colecchi C, Stone J, Sood R, Brink D. Behavioral and pharmacological therapies for late-life insomnia. JAMA 1999;281:991-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Abe Y, Mishima K, Kaneita Y, Li L, Ohida T, Nishikawa T, et al. Stress coping behaviors and sleep hygiene practices in a general population sample of Japanese adults with insomnia. Clin Neurophysiol 2012;42:145.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Brown F, Buboltz W, Soper B. Relationship of sleep hygiene awareness, sleep hygiene practices, and sleep quality in university students. Behav Med 2002;28:33-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Digdon N. Circadian preference and college students' beliefs about sleep education. Chronobiol Int 2010;27:297-317.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Robinson D, Gelaye B, Tadesse MG, Williams MA, Lemma S, Berhane Y. Daytime sleepiness, circadian preference, caffeine consumption and Khat use among college students in Ethiopia. J Sleep Disord-Treat Care 2013;3. doi: 10.4172/2325-9639.1000130.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Hicks R, Fernandez C, Pellegrini R. The changing sleep habits of university students: An update. Percept Mot Skills 2001;93:648-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Taylor D, Gardner C, Bramoweth A, Williams J, Roane B, Grieser E, et al. Insomnia and mental health in college students. Behav Sleep Med 2011;9:107-16.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Lund H, Reider B, Whiting A, Prichard J. Sleep patterns and predictors of disturbed sleep in a large population of college students. J Adolescent Health 2010;46:124-32.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Eller T, Aluoja A, Vasar V, Veldi M. Symptoms of anxiety and depression in Estonian medical students with sleep problems. Depress Anxiety 2006;23:250-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Lopes E, Milheiro I, Maia A. Sleep quality in college students: A study about the contribution of lifestyle, academic performance, and general well-being. Sleep Med 2013;14:e185.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Engle-Friedman M. The effects of sleep loss on capacity and effort. Sleep Sci 2014;7:213-24.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Abdulghani H, Alrowais N, Bin-Saad N, Al-Subaie N, Haji A, Alhaqwi A. Sleep disorder among medical students: Relationship to their academic performance. Med Teach 2012;34(Suppl 1):S37-41.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Buysse D, Reynolds C, Monk T, Berman S, Kupfer D. The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 1989;28:193-213.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Adan A, Fabbri M, Natale V, Prat G. Sleep beliefs scale (SBS) and circadian typology. J Sleep Res 2006;15:125-32.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Yazdi Z, Loukzadeh Z, Moghaddam P, Jalilolghadr S. Sleep hygiene practices and their relation to sleep quality in medical students of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. J Caring Sci 2016;5:153-60.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Suen L, Ellis Hon K, Tam W. Association between sleep behavior and sleep-related factors among university students in Hong Kong. Chronobiol Int 2008;25:760-75.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Voinescu B, Szentagotai-Tatar A. Sleep hygiene awareness: Its relation to sleep quality and diurnal preference. J Mol Psychiatry 2015;3:1.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Bosie G, Tefera T, Hailu G. Knowledge, attitude and practice with respect to sleep among undergraduate medical students of Mekelle University. Sleep Biol Rhythms 2012;10:264-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Gellis LA, Lichstein KL. Sleep hygiene practices of good and poor sleepers in the United States: An internet-based study. Behav Ther 2009;40:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Background
  Methodology
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed85    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded44    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal