World Rural Health Conference
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 1910
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 8  |  Page : 2656-2660  

Use of dabigatran for treatment of left ventricular thrombus: A tertiary care center experience


Department of Cardiology, Ujala Hospital, Kashipur, U S Nagar, UK, India

Date of Submission11-Jun-2019
Date of Decision19-Jun-2019
Date of Acceptance28-Jun-2019
Date of Web Publication28-Aug-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Bhupendra Verma
Department of Cardiology, Consultant Interventional Cardiologist, Ujala Hospital, Kashipur, U S Nagar, UK - 244 713
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_459_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Objectives: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now replacing vitamin K oral anticoagulants (VKAs) owing to superior efficacy, rapid action, less bleeding, wider therapeutic range,and fewer food and drug interactions.Unfortunately, the available data on the use of DOACs, particularly dabigatran, for treatment of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) issparse.We have hereby presented the largest study on use of dabigatran in LVT. Methods: Retrospective data of patients having LVT as diagnosed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was screened. Patients on dabigatran were included in the study and follow up data of 6 months was obtained through medical records. Results: f the 15 patients included in the study, the most frequent etiology was ischemic heart disease (67%), including 7 patients of STEMI (47%), followed by non-ischemic cardiomyopathy in 5 patients (33%). Only one patient, with STEMI, developed mild gastrointestinal bleeding at 3 months. Complete clot resolution was seen in 2 patients (13%) at first week of follow up and total 5 patients (33%) at the end of second week. The rate of clot resolution at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months were 80%, 93% and 100%, respectively. The median duration required for complete clot resolution was 30 days (IQR=14-30). Conclusion: Dabigatran appears to be safe, highly efficacious and results in rapid LV clot resolution. DOACs may be a suitable alternative to warfarin in treatment of LV thrombus. However, larger studies are required to validate this hypothesis.

Keywords: Direct oral anticoagulants, intracardiac thrombus, left ventricular clot, new oral anticoagulants, thrombus resolution


How to cite this article:
Verma B, Singh A, Kumar M. Use of dabigatran for treatment of left ventricular thrombus: A tertiary care center experience. J Family Med Prim Care 2019;8:2656-60

How to cite this URL:
Verma B, Singh A, Kumar M. Use of dabigatran for treatment of left ventricular thrombus: A tertiary care center experience. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 9];8:2656-60. Available from: http://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2019/8/8/2656/265596




  Introduction Top


Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is usually seen in patients with significantly reduced left ventricular systolic function complicating both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies.[1],[2] This is explained by presence of Virchow's triad in the ventricle – reduced wall motion, local myocardial injury, and hypercoagulability/stasis of blood flow.[3] A total of 80% of these cases are related to ischemia, most commonly ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), particularly anterior STEMI.[3] The life span of patients with ischemic heart disease is increasing due to consistent diagnostic and therapeutic advances.[3],[4],[5],[6],[7] With this the occurrence of post-myocardial infarction (MI) LV thrombus may have declined, but the prevalence of heart failure is increasing with improved survival.[2] The LVT is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and high rates of thromboembolic complications such as stroke.[2] Anticoagulant therapy is, therefore, required to minimize the risk of systemic embolization.[8]

Currently, vitamin K oral anticoagulants (VKAs) are preferred for the treatment of LVT as recommended by guidelines.[9],[10],[11] Unfortunately, the data for VKAs are based on observational studies in the prethrombolytic and thrombolytic eras.[12],[13] Non-VKA direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are currently replacing VKA in several clinical indications. DOACs are currently approved for venous thromboembolism (VTE), nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, and postoperative VTE prophylaxis.[14],[15] The advantages of DOACs include superior effectiveness in preventing systemic embolism, rapid onset of action, lower incidence of major bleeding, wider therapeutic range not requiring monitoring and frequent dose adjustment, fewer food, and drug interactions and cost-effectiveness.[16]

DOACs are being increasingly used for the management of LVT. However, the available data on the use of DOACs are limited to individual case reports.[3],[16],[17],[18] Dabigatran is a reversible direct thrombin inhibitor and is currently approved for the thromboprophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation and patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.[19] It is thought to have thrombolytic effect even on chronic clot by its potential to inhibit thrombin bound to fibrin and fibrin degradation products.[19],[20] Moreover, it is comparatively less costly and is the only DOAC with an approved antidote (idarucizumab). However, data related to use of dabigatran in this context is very sparse as compared to other DOACs.[19],[21],[22],[23] We have presented here the effect of dabigatran on LV clot resolution in both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies. To our knowledge, this is the largest study of dabigatran regarding its use in treatment of LV thrombus.


  Materials and Methods Top


This was a single center, retrospective, observational study carried out over a period of 2 years from December 2016 to November 2018 at a tertiary care hospital. Consecutive patients with LVT of any origin not on any prior anticoagulation were screened and only patients where dabigatran was started were included in the study. LVT was assessed using transthoracic echocardiography, defined as an echo dense mass adjacent to the myocardium. The clot diameter was measured and area assessed by planimetry on 2-D echocardiography. Dabigatran was used in a dose of 220 mg/day along with antiplatelets and 300 mg/day without antiplatelets. In all cases, dabigatran was continued till 6 months even after clot resolution as recommended.[9],[10],[11] Data were obtained through medical records of each hospital visit and through phone if required. The first follow-ups were weekly till 2 weeks and thereafter all the patients were followed-up monthly. Follow-up data of at least 6 months were retrieved. All data were shown as means ± standard deviation for continuous variables and as numbers and percentages of patients for categorical variables.


  Results Top


Baseline characteristics

The baseline patient characteristics are shown in [Table 1]. In this retrospective series, 60% patients (9/15) were males and the mean age was 41 years. All 15 patients had completed 6 months of follow-up. Ischemic etiology was seen in ten patients (67%), which included seven patients of STEMI. All these patients received dabigatran at a dose of 110 mg BD in addition to the required antiplatelet agents. Nonischemic cardiomyopathy was present in five patients (33%), with none having valvular heart disease. These patients were given dabigatran at a dose of 150 mg BD. Additionally atrial fibrillation was associated in three patients (20%). The mean baseline LVEF was 32%. The mean clot size was 157 ± 130 cm2, with the largest clot being 25 mm in diameter. Interestingly, the patient with the largest clot had biventricular clot [Figure 1] (a case of dilated cardiomyopathy).
Table 1: Baseline patient characteristics (n=15)

Click here to view
Figure 1: (a) Biventricular thrombus in a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy; (b) Complete thrombus resolution at 3 months with dabigatran 300 mg/day in bid dose

Click here to view


Follow-up

Follow up data is presented in [Table 2]. At 6 months of follow-up, there were no significant drug-related complications despite use of dabigatran along with antiplatelets in more than half of the patients (67%). Only one patient, with STEMI, developed mild gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding at 3 months. Dabigatran was stopped in this patient as the clot had already resolved and the bleeding improved without requiring any blood transfusion. Complete clot resolution was seen in two patients (13%) at first week of follow-up and total five patients (33%) at the end of second week. By the completion of first month, clot was completely resolved in 12 patients (80%). At 3 months complete clot resolution was seen in 14 patients (93%). The single patient who still had clot at 3 months was a case of ischemic cardiomyopathy. In this patient, the dabigatran dose was increased from 220 mg/day to 300 mg/day and had a successful clot resolution at 6 months of follow-up. The median duration required for complete clot resolution was 30 days (Interquartile range (IQR) =14–30)). In all patients, at least 50% clot resolution (by area) was seen within 1 month.
Table 2: Follow-up (n=15)

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Warfarin (VKAs) remains the first choice of treatment for left ventricular thrombus. However, there use is based on observational studies done in past prior to availability of potent antiplatelet and antithrombotic agents.[12],[13] Its use is declining in favor of DOACs for various indications owing to its narrow therapeutic index, the need for regular monitoring, dietary restrictions, and multiple drug interactions.[16] Studies have shown that anticoagulation with warfarin can resolve fresh ventricular thrombi, but not chronic thrombi after STEMI.[24] However, several case reports have recently shown that LV thrombi can be treated successfully with dabigatran.[19],[21],[23],[25],[26] In our study, there was complete resolution of LV clot both of acute and chronic etiology. This finding supports the thrombolytic action of dabigatran due to its specific binding to both free as well as clot-bound active thrombin molecules.[19],[20]

The most common etiology of LVT in our study was prior STEMI (47%) and occurred predominantly in males (60%). Several meta-analysis and large studies of LVT have reported acute myocardial infarction as the most frequent cause and male preponderance of LV thrombus.[27],[28],[29] On the contrary, a recent large retrospective study reported heart failure (68.5%) to be the most common cause followed by acute MI (25.9%).[2] This probably may be due to rising prevalence of heart failure and improvement in management and system of care for STEMI. The incidence of LVT in patients with STEMI in the current era ranged from 4% to 15%.[30] The embolic complications were seen in 2–3% patients in thrombolytic era compared to 10–35% in the prethrombolytic era.[31] Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the most commonly used modality to detect LVT. However, echocardiography, using delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) as the reference, yielded a sensitivity of 33%, specificity of 91%.[32] Therefore, use of TTE may lead to considerable underdiagnosis and CMR may be preferred wherever feasible.

There is no consensus on dose of dabigatran for LVT because in the case studies the dose varied between 110 and 150 mg bid. We have used a dose of 220 mg/day in patients with ischemic heart disease taking antiplatelet agents and 300 mg/day in all other clinical conditions. This was based on European society of cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommending lower dose of DOACs (in the case of dabigatran 110 bid) along with antiplatelets to decrease hemorrhagic complications.[33] Dabigatran is associated with a lower risk of bleeding compared with VKAs, and may be preferred when given along with antiplatelet therapy in ischemic heart disease. The single patient in our study who did not respond to dabigatran at 220 mg/day till 3 months had complete clot resolution at end of 6 months after increasing the dose to 300 mg/day. This appears to be an attractive strategy of giving dabigatran trial of 220 mg/day for 3 months in ischemic heart disease and increasing the dose only if there is no clot resolution. This cautious approach may result in lower bleeding complications in this group of patients.

Complete clot resolution in our study was seen in two patients at 1 week (13%), five patients at 2 weeks (33%), 12 patients at end of first month (80%), 14 patients after 3 months (93%), and complete clot resolution was seen in all patients at completion of 6 months follow-up. In the previous cases, the resolution of the LV thrombi by dabigatran was confirmed after 3 weeks to 4 months.[34] In a recent report, clot resolution in a patient with anteroseptal MI was seen as early as 2 weeks.[23] Moreover, the median duration required for complete clot resolution was 30 days (IQR = 14–30) in our study. A recent meta-analysis of case reports regarding use of DOACs in 36 patients showed the median duration of treatment to clot resolution was 30 days (IQR = 22.5–47.0).[27] It is quite interesting that the rapidity of clot resolution by dabigatran is comparatively greater than the other DOACs. A meta-analysis including 41 patients reported the median time of LV clot resolution as 40 days, 36 days, and 24 days for rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, respectively.[35] This is a clear advantage of DOACs over warfarin (VKAs) which has a slower action. Furthermore, this implies that the required duration of anticoagulation by dabigatran may be lesser than warfarin. The current guidelines recommend VKAs in patients with LVT for at least 3–6 months.[9],[10],[11] Though we continued treatment even after clot resolution till 6 months, but there is still controversy regarding stopping or continuing treatment after resolution of thrombus.[36]

Dabigatran in this study was highly efficacious resulting in LV clot resolution in all patients (100%). In a large retrospective study, including 128 patients with LVT, all patients who received DOACs experienced complete clot resolution.[2] Interestingly, although warfarin was still the most frequently used oral anticoagulant (87% vs 3.7% taking DOACs), clot resolution was seen in only 75% patients within one year.[2] A meta-summary of case reports showed LV thrombus resolution in 87.9% patients taking DOACs.[27] Additionally, a single center study including 35 patients reported clot resolution in 83% patients on follow-up by TTE.[28] Though this reflects that DOACs may be more efficacious than warfarin, but there is no study of direct comparison between the newer agents. Another recent meta-analysis of case reports showed thrombus resolution success rate of 81%, 100%, and 88.9% for rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, respectively.[35] However, all these studies had comparatively very few patients of dabigatran. Large randomized studies are definitely needed before drawing any conclusion.

It is noteworthy that the excellent results with dabigatran were achieved in this study without any significant complication. There were no episodes of stroke or peripheral embolism. Mild GI bleeding was seen in one patient (6.6%) taking antiplatelets which resolved after stopping dabigatran. In a large study of 52 patients, there was one transient ischemic attack and four bleeding events (7.7%) including three GI bleeds and one epistaxis requiring transfusion.[28] Similar to our study all these patients were on antiplatelet agents. In a metanalysis of 36 case reports, there was one nonfatal bleeding event (3%) and no thromboembolic event.[27] Another retrospective study of 98 patients showed no difference between warfarin and DOACs in terms of 1-year survival free of stroke or systemic embolism.[37] Additionally, over 6 months of follow-up we did not find any case of clot recurrence or new clot formation. In contrast, a prospective study of 35 patients with LVT after STEMI exclusively taking warfarin reported a recurrence rate of 18.5%.[38]

Implication for primary care/family physicians/healthcare professionals

From this retrospective study and earlier case reports there is clear suggestion that dabigatran may be superior to VKAs by allowing rapid and complete clot resolution. Moreover, no thromboembolism occurred between treatment initiation and clot resolution. Additionally, treatment with DOACs may require shorter duration than with VKAs due to rapid clot resolution. Therefore, DOACs appear to be suitable treatment alternative for LVT and there is clear need for future research of larger and randomized nature. This view is further supported by the clear advantage of DOACs over VKAs in other clinical settings.

Study limitations

The major strengths of this study include the largest number of patients studied in context to dabigatran till date and relatively longer duration of follow-up. This series adds to the current evidence supporting use of DOACs in treatment of LVT. However, there are significant limitations too. First, this was a retrospective study from a single center. Second, sensitivity and specificity of echocardiography for the detection of LVT are limited compared to CMR. Third, the sample size of patients with LVT is small. Finally, the findings of this study are subject to confounding and bias that are inherent to the observational studies.


  Conclusion Top


DOACs are rapidly gaining clinical acceptance in view of noninferior efficacy and limitations to using VKA including the need for regular monitoring and multiple dietary and drug interactions. This study demonstrates that dabigatran is highly efficacious and results in rapid LV clot resolution in varied clinical scenarios. Moreover, it can be safely used without increased risk of bleeding or systemic embolism. Although limited by retrospective nature and small sample, this study suggests that DOACs may be a suitable alternative to warfarin in treatment of LV thrombus. However, larger studies including randomized controlled trials are required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared to treatment with VKA.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Abdelnaby M, Almaghraby A, Abdelkarim O, Saleh Y, Hammad B, Badran H. The role of rivaroxaban in left ventricular thrombi. Anatol J Cardiol 2019;21:47-50.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
McCarthy CP, Murphy S, Venkateswaran RV, Singh A, Chang LL, Joice MG, et al. Left ventricular thrombus: Contemporary etiologies, treatment strategies, and outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:2007-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Habash F, Vallurupalli S. Challenges in management of left ventricular thrombus. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis 2017;11:203-13.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Verma B, Singh A, Saxena AK, Kumar M. Deflated balloon-facilitated direct stenting in primary angioplasty (The DBDS technique): A pilot study. Cardiol Res 2018;9:284-92.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Verma B, Patel A, Katyal D, Singh VR, Singh AK, Singh A, et al. Real world experience of a biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (Yukon Choice PC Elite) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty: A multicentric observational study (The Elite India study). Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2019;7:1103-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Verma B, Singh A. Comparison of contrast enhanced low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography with 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography in assessment of myocardial viability. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2019;7:1287-92.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Verma B, Katyal D, Patel A, Singh VR, Kumar S. Relation of systolic and diastolic epicardial adipose tissue thickness with presence and severity of coronary artery disease (The EAT CAD study). J Family Med Prim Care 2019;8:1470-5.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
8.
Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, Antz M, Hacke W, Oldgren J, et al. European heart rhythm association practical guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace 2013;15:625-51.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE Jr, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Executive summary. Circulation 2013;127:e362-425.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Vandvik PO, Lincoff AM, Gore JM, Gutterman DD, Sonnenberg FA, Alonso-Coello P, et al. Primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis: American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2012;141 (2 Suppl):e637S-68S.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2018;39:119-77.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Cregler LL. Antithrombotic therapy in left ventricular thrombosis and systemic embolism. Am Heart J 1992;123:1110-4.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Keating EC, Gross SA, Schlamowitz RA, Glassman J, Mazur JH, Pitt WA, et al. Mural thrombi in myocardial infarctions. Prospective evaluation by two-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Med 1983;74:989-95.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Savelieva I, Camm AJ. Practical considerations for using novel oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Clin Cardiol 2014;37:32-47.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Rao P, Burkart T. Advances in oral anticoagulation therapy-what's in the pipeline? Blood Rev 2017;31:205-11.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Bennett S, Satchithananda D, Law G. The use of Apixaban for the treatment of an LV thrombus. Echo Res Pract 2018;5:K63-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Shokr M, Ahmed A, Abubakar H, Sayedahmad Z, Rashed A, Afonso L, et al. Use of direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of left ventricular thrombi: A tertiary center experience and review of the literature. Clin Case Rep 2018;7:135-42.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Bahmaid R, Ammar S, Al-Subaie S, Soofi M, Mhish H, Yahia M. Efficacy of target specific oral anticoagulants on the resolution of left ventricular thrombus. Surg Case Rep Rev 2018. doi: 10.15761/SCRR.1000107.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Kolekar S, Munjewar C, Sharma S. Dabigatran for left ventricular thrombus. Indian Heart J 2015;67:495-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Morita S, Ajiro Y, Uchida Y, Iwade K. Dabigatran for left atrial thrombus. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2745.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Nagamoto Y, Shiomi T, Matsuura T, Okahara A, Takegami K, Mine D, et al. Resolution of a left ventricular thrombus by the thrombolytic action of dabigatran. Heart Vessels 201429:560-2.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Noflatscher M, Moes N, Gassner EM, Marschang P. Dabigatran added to dual antiplatelet therapy to treat a left ventricular thrombus in an 87 year old patient with myocardial infarction and very high bleeding risk. Front Pharmacol 2018;9:217.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Yamamoto T, Konishi T, Funayama N, Kikuchi B, Hotta D, Ohori K. Resolution of left ventricular thrombus after dabigatran therapy in two patients with old anteroseptal myocardial infarction. Cardiol Pharmacol 2015;4:152.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Niemann M, Gaudron PD, Bijnens B, Störk S, Beer M, Hillenbrand H, et al. Differentiation between fresh and old left ventricular thrombi by deformation imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:667-75.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Ohashi N, Okada T, Uchida M, Amioka M, Fujiwara M, Kaseda S. Effects of dabigatran on the resolution of left ventricular thrombus after acute myocardial infarction. Intern Med 2015;54:1761-3.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Kaku B. Intra-cardiac thrombus resolution after anti-coagulation therapy with dabigatran in a patient with mid-ventricular obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A case report. J Med Case Rep 2013;7:238.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Leow AS, Sia CH, Tan BY, Loh JP. A meta-summary of case reports of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant use in patients with left ventricular thrombus. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2018;46:68-73.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Fleddermann AM, Hayes CH, Magalski A, Main ML. Efficacy of direct acting oral anticoagulants in treatment of left ventricular thrombus. Am J Cardiol 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.05.009.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Maniwa N, Fujino M, Nakai M, Nishimura K, Miyamoto Y, Kataoka Y, et al. Anticoagulation combined with antiplatelet therapy in patients with left ventricular thrombus after first acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2018;39:201-8.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Shacham Y, Leshem-Rubinow E, Ben Assa E, Rogowski O, Topilsky Y, Roth A, et al. Frequency and correlates of early left ventricular thrombus formation following anterior wall acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2013;111:667-70.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Delewi R, Zijlstra F, Piek JJ. Left ventricular thrombus formation after acute myocardial infarction. Heart 2012;98:1743-9.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Weinsaft JW, Kim HW, Crowley AL, Klem I, Shenoy C, Van Assche L, et al. LV thrombus detection by routine echocardiography: Insights into performance characteristics using delayed enhancement CMR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:702-12.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2019;40:87-165.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Hori M, Connolly SJ, Zhu J, Liu LS, Lau CP, Pais P, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin effects on ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes and bleeding in Asians and non-Asians with atrial fibrillation. Stroke 2013;44:1891-6.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Kajy M, Shokr M, Ramappa P. Use of direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of left ventricular thrombus: Systematic review of current literature. Am J Ther 2019. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000937.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Bahmaid RA, Ammar S, Al-Subaie S, Soofi MA, Mhish H, Yahia MA. Efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants on the resolution of left ventricular thrombus-A case series and literature review. JRSM Cardiovasc Dis 2019;8:2048004019839548. doi: 10.1177/2048004019839548  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Robinson A, Ruth B, Dent J. Direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin for left ventricular thrombi: A single center experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71 (11 Suppl):A981.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Ebrahimi M, Fazlinezhad A, Alvandi-Azari M, Abdar Esfahani M. Long-term clinical outcomes of the left ventricular thrombus in patients with ST elevation anterior myocardial infarction. ARYA Atheroscler 2015;11:1-4.  Back to cited text no. 38
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
   Materials and Me...
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed519    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded46    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal