World Rural Health Conference
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 1784
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents 
CASE REPORT
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 8  |  Page : 2728-2731  

Customized nasal prosthesis in continuous positive airway pressure treatment, current trend in treating obstructive sleep apnea for better patient compliance


Department of Prosthodontics Crown and Bridge and Implantology, C.K.S. Theja Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Chadalawada Nagar, Renigunta Road, Renigunta, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India

Date of Submission19-Jun-2019
Date of Decision19-Jun-2019
Date of Acceptance12-Jul-2019
Date of Web Publication28-Aug-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Nagam Raja Reddy
Department of Prosthodontics Crown and Bridge and Implantology, C.K.S. Theja Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Chadalawada Nagar, Renigunta Road, Renigunta, Tirupati - 517 507, Andhra Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_473_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Snoring is common disorder in India, which is caused due to obstructive sleep apnea. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is an effective treatment for this condition. Prefabricated nasal masks lack intimate adaptation and cause air leakage producing discomfort for patient and decrease the compliance for treatment. This article describes a simple method for customizing nasal CPAP mask and fabrication using maxillofacial prosthodontic laboratory techniques currently available.

Keywords: Continuous positive airway pressure, maxillofacial prosthesis, sleep apnea, snoring


How to cite this article:
Reddy NR, Sasikala N, Karthik K V, Priya GK. Customized nasal prosthesis in continuous positive airway pressure treatment, current trend in treating obstructive sleep apnea for better patient compliance. J Family Med Prim Care 2019;8:2728-31

How to cite this URL:
Reddy NR, Sasikala N, Karthik K V, Priya GK. Customized nasal prosthesis in continuous positive airway pressure treatment, current trend in treating obstructive sleep apnea for better patient compliance. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 8];8:2728-31. Available from: http://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2019/8/8/2728/265601




  Introduction Top


Majority of the people in India face the problem of obesity (nearly 41 million - as per wall street journal report) and its related complications among which one is snoring, which is mainly due to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The most widely accepted basic treatment for treating is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), which was introduced by Sullivan et al. in 1981.[1]

In Indian studies, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) varied from 4.4% to 13.7% and obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) varied from 2.4% to 2.8%. OSA in Indian males has more prevalence than females. CPAP was introduced by Sullivan et al. in 1981, for treating moderate to severe OSA. Prefabricated nasal CPAP is not universally tolerated by patients, with compliance rates estimated between 50% and 80%, excluding patients who seek alternative treatment.[2]


  Case History Top


A 39-year-old male patient reported to the Department of Prosthodontics with the chief complaint of ill-fitting nasal mask of CPAP machine [Figure 1]a.
Figure 1: (a, b, c) Duplicating the prosthesis. (d, e, f) Impression making procedure

Click here to view


He was feeling uncomfortable in wearing the mask and was thinking to quit the therapy due to noise caused by air leakage and the irritation caused by the straps used to hold the prosthesis in position. The normal pressure generally utilized for this therapy is in between the range of 0–25 cm of water. The pressure used by the patient was 15 cm of water for the therapy.[3]

Duplicating the prosthesis

One end of the prefabricated prosthesis was blocked and filled it with liquid wax. Later, it was acrylized using heat cure acrylic material. The finished acrylic model was adjusted using wax as per the requirement. Type-III dental cast was obtained using alginate for duplication. Position stabilizers were created on both sides of the prosthesis.

The external wax surface was made to mimic the prosthesis was then dewaxed. Later, it was packed with silicone material to obtain the duplicated model of the prosthesis. Finishing and polishing of the obtained prosthesis was done [Figure 1]b and [Figure 1]c.

Impression making

Impression was made using the duplicated prosthesis. Internal nares part was removed and an orthodontic wire was used as substructure for supporting the impression material [Figure 1]d.

The flange extensions were marked on the patient who are to be transferred to the impression later [Figure 1]e. Cotton plugs with petroleum jelly inserted into the two nares separately, and then the impression was made with light body polyvinyl siloxane material [Figure 1]f.

The impression was removed along with the cotton carefully. It was checked for proper recording and the excess is removed. Liquid wax was poured on to the cotton retrieved on impression for better contouring.

Fabrication of the mould

The mould was fabricated in four sections. The base of the impression tray was placed into a mix of type-II, type-III, and type-IV dental stone up to the bottom of the tray. The stone land area of the first section of the mould was smoothened and keyed. Petroleum jelly was applied as separating agent.

The second section was made in two halves up to flange extensions. The first half was made with tapered smooth inner walls. The second half of the second section was made with indentations [Figure 2]a. The impression was boxed in wax and acrylic was poured. Acrylic core was smoothened to expose the nares extension [Figure 2]b. The third section of mould was a stone ring formed around resin core. The stone ring was contoured to converge downward leaving a half inch margin around the mares and indentations were made [Figure 2]c.
Figure 2: (a, b, c) Investing the impression for customizing the prosthesis. (d) Block out done. (e) Checking the patency for the prosthesis

Click here to view


The impression material was carefully removed from the nares; all the four sections carefully removed. Wax block out was done on the internal surface of the acrylic in the third section and the flange extension area [Figure 2]d and [Figure 2]e.

It was carefully reassembled back and the acrylic was poured into the nares extensions in two parts separately. Now the acrylic part has been carefully removed and repositioned. The block out wax was removed and the repositioning of the parts was done leaving one of the second sections and the patency was checked and necessary block out done [Figure 3]a and [Figure 3]b.
Figure 3: (a, b) Component parts of the completed mold set. (c) Customized nasal continuous positive airway pressure mask. (d) Fit of the prosthesis as seen in patient

Click here to view


Prosthesis fabrication

After applying petroleum jelly, the silicone elastomer was packed in all sections and reassembled carefully. Slight compression was applied to the mould and allowed it to cure for 24 h as per manufacturer's instructions. After curing has been done, all the parts were removed carefully without damaging the prosthesis. The excess was trimmed off and necessary corrections were made and finishing was done [Figure 3]c.

Clinical insertion

The prosthesis was then checked in the patient for fit and comfort [Figure 3]d. Overnight usage of the customized prosthesis was reviewed. Follow-up visits were done after 24 h and at eighth day.


  Discussion Top


Primary health care (PHC) is on essential part of health care and its main principles are equity, health promotion and disease prevention, community participation, appropriate health technology, and multisectoral approach. Organizational and management key elements of PHC are strategic management, decentralization, coordination, and development of strategic systems.[3]

According to Nathan Alexander et al., sleep-disordered breathing is a multifactorial disease and requires a multidisciplinary team—including osteopathic, allopathic, ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialist, dental, speech, and myofunctional professionals—to manage the condition appropriately.[4]

According to Anuradhaa Subramanian et al., their study indicates that the association between type 2 diabetes and OSA is bidirectional. In addition to known predictors of OSA, diabetes-related foot disease and insulin treatment were identified as risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes.[5]

Since the incidence of the diabetes, overweight, aging population, etc., is more prevalent in India, it is the duty of physician who has identified in the first instance has to advice the necessary care and promote the health of the patient that comes under primary health care.

The CPAP device consists of a blower unit that produces continuous positive pressure airflow. This airflow is usually applied at the nose and is then directed through the upper airway (UA). CPAP increases the calibre of the airway in the retropalatal and retroglossal regions. It increases the lateral dimensions of the UA and thins the lateral pharyngeal walls, which are thicker in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea than in people without obstructive sleep apnoea.

Guidelines for use

Patients with severe sleep-disordered breathing [SDB] (respiratory disturbance index [RDI] >2,030) should be treated irrespective of their symptoms because of the increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity. Patients with an RDI of 520 should be treated if they have symptoms or coexistent cardiovascular disease. Patients with upper airway resistance syndrome may need CPAP therapy.[6]

Medicare guidelines specify criteria for ordering CPAP for patients with OSA. All patients with an apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) greater than 15 are considered eligible for CPAP, regardless of symptomatology. For patients with an AHI of 5–14.9, CPAP is indicated only if the patient has one of the following: excessive daytime sleepiness, hypertension, or cardiovascular disease.[6]

Side effects or limitations are related to the nasal interface, which has been found to occur in >50% of all CPAP patients. Proper fit of the prosthesis and treatment of nasal conditions are important factors, which ensure us compliance, because untreated conditions can result in discontinuation of treatment.[7]

Hence to improve compliance and give a better prosthesis, which will overcome the problems associated with prefabricated prosthesis, decision was made to customize the prefabricated prosthesis.

Compliance with this treatment may be influenced by various factors such as objective improvement in sleep apnea but also by the patient's subjective perception of the benefit. Bed mate or family support, side effects, and cost also affect the compliance.

In this case report, decision to duplicate the prosthesis was made so that the patient can continue the treatment without interference, which might affect the compliance. The custom nasal CPAP prosthesis demonstrates an intimate adaptation to the internal and external anatomy of the nose and overcomes three of the reasons often cited for noncompliance with CPAP prosthesis: air leakage from the prosthesis, noise, and discomfort.[8]

In a study by McEvoy et al., on 2717 individuals with moderate-to-severe sleep apnea and cardiovascular problems, the CPAP was used and resulted in decreased snoring, daytime sleepiness, and improved health-related quality of life and mood.[9]

In a systemic study by Rotenberg et al., there was only 34.1% compliance with the CPAP.[10]

The customized prosthesis minimizes the side effect of skin abrasion and allows the patient to use the CPAP machine at a lower positive pressure.[8] Patient showed increase in the compliance toward the treatment after recalling him for regular visits. More research must be done for newer materials and techniques.

Turnbull in his study stated that “Whilst the majority of patients following CPAP withdrawal show a rapid rise in their Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI), they have shown that there are a minority of individuals who, despite a slower return of OSA as evidenced by the ODI3%, do in fact have evidence of a faster return of sleep fragmentation when this is measured by an autonomic marker of arousal,”[11] which again causes the daytime sleepiness, lack of memory forming capabilities leading to depression.

Techniques such as customizing the mask to the face and addition of cushion to the extra nasal mask has been done[12],[13],[14] rather than intranasal mask customization. Though customizing the mask to extra nasal contours, problems, such as leakage, sound, etc., persist though reduced to some extent due to customization.

The patient was happy to have the customized prosthesis. Later, the polysomnography test was performed to get new values, which stated that only 11 cm of water was sufficient for the therapy. There is no need for the straps to hold the prosthesis, which resulted in decreased irritation to the skin. Due to proper fit of the prosthesis, there was no leakage of the air from it and thereby the noise and disturbance to the partner was eliminated.

With overall increase in the time of usage of the prosthesis, it was concluded that the compliance of the patient has been increased with customized nasal prosthesis.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Sullivan CE, Issa FG, Berthon-Jones M, Eves L. Reversal of obstructive sleep apnea by continuous positive airway pressure applied through nares. Lancet 1981;18:862-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Pépin JL, Krieger J, Rodenstein D, Cornette A, Sforza E, Delguste P, et al. Effective compliance during the first 3 months of continuous positive airway pressure. A European prospective study of 121 patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:1124-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Cvejin MM, Grujić V, Jakovljević D. Role of primary health care in health promotion. Med Pregl 2000;53:262-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Alexander N, Boota A, Hooks K, White JR. Rapid maxillary expansion and adenotonsillectomy in 9-year-old twins with pediatric obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: An interdisciplinary effort. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2019;119:126-34.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Subramanian A, Adderley NJ, Tracy A, Taverner T, Hanif W, Toulis KA, et al. Risk of incident obstructive sleep apnea among patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2019;42:954-63.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Kushida CA, Chediak A, Berry RB, Brown LK, Gozal D, Iber C, et al. Clinical guidelines for the manual titration of positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med 2008;4:157-71.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Hoffstein V, Viner S, Mateika S, Conway J. Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Patient compliance, perception of benefits, and side effects. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992;145:841-5.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
McLornan PM, Hansen NA, Verrett RG. Customizing a nasal CPAP mask using a silicone elastomer. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:147-52.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
McEvoy RD, Antic NA, Heeley E, Luo Y, Ou Q, Zhang X, et al. CPAP for prevention of cardiovascular events in obstructive sleep apnea. N Engl J Med 2016;375:919-31.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Sela M, Toledo N, Honen Y, Kimmel R. Customized Facial Constant Positive Air Pressure (CPAP) Masks. arXiv:1609.07049 [cs.GR].  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Turnbull C, Pattenden S, Gaisl T, Rossi V, Thiel S, Kohler M, et al. Return of sleep apnoea and sleep fragmentation following CPAP withdrawal in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. Eur Respir J 2019. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02351-2018.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Hsu DY, Cheng YL, Bien MY, Lee HC. Development of a method for manufacturing customized nasal mask cushion for CPAP therapy. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 2015;38:657-64.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Rotenberg BW, Murariu D, Pang KP. Trends in CPAP adherence over twenty years of data collection: A flattened curve. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;45:43.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Cheng YL, Hsu DY, Lee HC, Bien MY. Clinical verification of patients with obstructive sleep apnea provided with a customized cushion for continuous positive airway pressure. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:29-34.e1.  Back to cited text no. 14
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Case History
  Discussion
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed181    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded33    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal