World Rural Health Conference
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 6390
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 359-366  

Morbidities of rice mill workers and associated factors in a block of West Bengal: A matter of concern


Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, All India Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Date of Submission04-Oct-2019
Date of Decision07-Dec-2019
Date of Acceptance16-Dec-2019
Date of Web Publication28-Jan-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Soumit Roy
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, All India Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, Kolkata, West Bengal
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_858_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Context: Rice mill workers usually belong to unorganized sector and lack in training regarding hazard prevention. Unprotected exposure to suspended particles and fumes can lead to respiratory morbidities among them. Workers, especially loaders, were susceptible to work-related musculoskeletal diseases. Aim: To find out the morbidity profile and associated factors among rice mill workers. Methodology: A cross-sectional workplace-based study was conducted during July--September 2018 among 143 workers of two rice mills in Indas block, West Bengal. Workers, employed for at least 6 months in the rice mills and who gave informed written consent was interviewed using a predesigned pretested questionnaire and were clinically examined. Nonfasting capillary blood glucose estimation and spirometry were carried out. Workers contraindicated to spirometry were excluded. Result: Commonest morbidities were musculoskeletal discomfort (65%), hypertension (20.9%), and chronic respiratory morbidity (16.9%). No personal protective equipment (PPE) was used by these workers. Significant association of musculoskeletal discomfort was found with tobacco abuse (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) =2.90), job of loader (AOR = 3.51), and central obesity (AOR = 3.39). Hypertension was significantly associated with increasing age (AOR = 1.06), and increasing body mass index (AOR = 1.17). Whereas increasing age (AOR = 1.08), working inside mill (AOR = 7.58), working more than 48 hours a week (AOR = 7.37) were significantly associated with chronic respiratory morbidity. Conclusion: Optimization of working hours, effective continuous use of PPE, and use of proper ventilation technology are recommended. Proper work placement, preplacement examination, and periodic health screening with spirometry are also needed.

Keywords: Chronic respiratory, hypertension, morbidity, musculoskeletal, occupational diseases, rice mill


How to cite this article:
Roy S, Dasgupta A, Bandyopadhyay L, Paul B, Bandyopadhyay S, Kumar M. Morbidities of rice mill workers and associated factors in a block of West Bengal: A matter of concern. J Family Med Prim Care 2020;9:359-66

How to cite this URL:
Roy S, Dasgupta A, Bandyopadhyay L, Paul B, Bandyopadhyay S, Kumar M. Morbidities of rice mill workers and associated factors in a block of West Bengal: A matter of concern. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Mar 29];9:359-66. Available from: http://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2020/9/1/359/276792




  Introduction Top


India is the second largest rice producing country in world.[1] More than one lakh mills processing raw (white) and parboiled rice are running in India.[2] Processing of rice has several steps. After harvesting, paddy is threshed and sent to mills. In the mill, paddy is cleaned, parboiled (in case of white rice, parboiling is avoided), dried, and hulled. Then, bran is sorted and rice is polished, sorted for quality, and sent for sale. Air pollution is high in mills especially during cleaning, parboiling, and hulling.[3] Exposure to fungal spores containing aflatoxin in improperly stored paddy can potentiate the inflammatory reaction in lungs.[4] Moreover, rice husk contains high percentage of silica which itself is detrimental to human lungs. In mills, this husk is either blown using blower or burnt as a fuel for boiler. The boiler generates fly ash, suspended particulate matter (SPM), smoke, and oxides of carbon. The longstanding irritation caused by these organic and inorganic dust results in mucosal hypertrophy leading to chronic respiratory diseases as well as other occupational diseases like pulmonary fibrosis, pleural thickening, and bronchogenic carcinoma.[3] Lifting and carrying heavy sacks is the major job component in a rice mill. Often, due to lack of skills the workers have to adopt inappropriate work postures leading to musculoskeletal problems and workplace injuries.[5]

Bankura is one of the largest paddy producing districts in West Bengal and has 83 rice mills. Indas block in Bankura district has 12 rice mills which are currently operating.[6]

Very few studies are available in India on rice mill workers and most of these available studies focus on respiratory morbidities only. Moreover, majority of the previous studies did not classify workers as per their job profile to elicit the association of occupational differentials with morbidity pattern. In this context, a cross-sectional study was conducted among workers from two of these 12 rice mills of Indas to find out the morbidity profile and its associated factors with in depth analysis of occupational differentials.


  Materials and Methods Top


Study Design: A cross-sectional workplace-based study was done during July–September 2018 among workers employed in 2 rice mills of Indas block, West Bengal.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: All types of workers who were employed in these mills and working for at least 6 months were included in the study. Workers who did not give informed written consent were excluded. Workers who had contraindication for spirometry, such as pregnancy, history of acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, or heart failure or in the previous 6 weeks had undergone abdominothoracic, head and neck, or cataract surgery were excluded from spirometry.[7]

Sample Size and Sampling Technique: In a previous study, prevalence of respiratory morbidity among rice mill workers was 40.73%.[8] Now taking standard normal deviate Z = 1.96 (for 95% confidence interval) and 20% relative error (d) minimum sample size was Z 2 x p x (1-p)/(p x d)2 = 139.7 = 140. Out of the total 147 workers who were included in the study 143 workers actually participated (response rate = 97.3%). One worker was excluded from spirometry due to history of valvular operation in recent past. Thus, 142 participants undertook spirometry.

Study tools

  1. Pretested predesigned schedule in the local language with the following domains:


    1. Sociodemographic characteristics {age, gender, religion, caste, marital status, type of family, education, socioeconomic status (modified BG Prasad scale), Per Capita Income (PCI)}
    2. Behavioral characteristics: {addiction, occupational physical activity [adapted from Occupational Physical Activity Questionnaire}.[9]
    3. Occupational differentials {type of job, work inside mill or not, work experience, work hours/week, use of personal protective equipment (PPE), self-perceived heavy work, self-perceived workplace discomfort}
    4. Morbidity Profile


    • Musculoskeletal morbidity {using Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ)},[10],[11]
    • Respiratory morbidity (result of spirometry)
    • Diabetes [result of capillary blood glucose (CBG) estimation]
    • Hypertension (result of blood pressure (BP) measurement)
    • Nutritional status (result of anthropometry)
    • Other morbidities


  2. Aneroid sphygmomanometer
  3. Stethoscope
  4. Portable calibrated adult weighing machine
  5. Nonstretchable measuring tape
  6. Autocalibrated PC-based spirometer (RMS HELIOS 401™)
  7. Glucometer


Data collection: This study was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee of All India Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, Kolkata (15/11/2017). After getting permission of owners camps were organized in those mills. Informed written consent was obtained and workers were interviewed with help of a predesigned pretested structured questionnaire. After which they were examined clinically, BP was measured and anthropometric measurement was conducted as per standard operating procedures.[12]

Spirometric examination was carried out in sitting posture as per standard method.[13] Ethnic correction using Indian predicted equation and temperature correction were done by software provided with spirometer. Values of forced vital capacity (FVC, % of predicted value), forced expiratory volume in 1st second (FEV1,% of predicted value), FVC/FEV1, and peak exploratory flow rate (PEFR) were noted. Nonfasting CBG estimation was done aseptically. All biomedical wastes were taken care of according to standard norms.[12]

Operational definitions

Chronic respiratory morbidity was defined as abnormal spirometric value according to standard guideline.[13]

  • Obstructive disease was defined as FEV1/FVC <0.7.
  • Restrictive disease was defined as FEV1/FVC ratio ≥0.7 and FVC <80% predicted.
  • Mixed pattern was denoted if there was FEV1/FVC < 0.7 and FVC <80% predicted.
  • FEV1 ≥80% predicted was noted as mild; FEV1 in between 50% to 80% predicted was termed as moderate and FEV1 <50% predicted value was interpreted as severe respiratory disease.


Musculoskeletal morbidity was defined as attainment of lowest positive score (≥ 1.5) in CMDQ questionnaire.

Central obesity was defined as presence of waist circumference >90 cm in male and >80 cm in female participants.

Hypertension was defined as Systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mm of Hg or Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mm of Hg or history of hypertensive medication use.

Diabetes/high blood sugar was denoted as nonfasting CBG ≥160 mg/dl or history of diabetes medication use.

Current smoker was denoted as persons who were smoking currently and smoked at least 100 cigarettes/bidis in life time.

Data analysis: All data were compiled and analyzed using MS Excel 2013 and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 16 (SPSS for Windows, version 16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). Descriptive and inferential statistics including univariate and multivariable logistic regression were calculated. P value < 0.2 in univariate model was used as selection criteria for a biologically plausible variable in multivariable model where P value < 0.05 was considered as level of significance.


  Result Top


Most of the workers were males (95.1%), Hindus (97.2%), Married (82.5%), and belonged to joint family (65.7%). Almost two-third (65.0%) was current smokers. Three-fourth of the study subjects (75.5%) used any form of tobacco. Nearly, half (41.3%) of them were consuming alcohol. Multiple addictions were present among 39.9% subjects. Majority of them (60.1%) worked predominantly inside the mill. Their occupational profile is shown in [Figure 1]. Less than half (43.4%) wrapped cloth over their mouth and nostril to prevent dust inhalation while working. No other PPE was used by them.
Figure 1: Occupational profile of study subjects (N = 143)

Click here to view


Other background characteristics and occupational differentials are shown in [Table 1]. About 23.1% complained about dust and improper ventilation and 21% complained about uncomfortable temperature in workplace. 17.1% workers received injury during work in their lifetime. Only one needed hospitalization. No one faced any disability due to injury. Cut was the commonest type of injury (32.0%) followed by muscle sprain (28.0%) and blunt trauma (20.0%). Injuries were more common among loaders (52.0%). 69.2% was suffering from any kind of morbidity. Commonest morbidities were musculoskeletal morbidity (65%), hypertension (21%), and chronic respiratory morbidity (16.9%). Their morbidity profile is demonstrated in [Figure 2]. Nutritional status as measured by body mass index (BMI) revealed presence of underweight (18.2%) and overweight (20.3%) among whom 3.5% were obese. Central obesity was present in 37.8% subjects. 14.7% had pallor. Mean PEFR (SD) was 4.92 (1.68) liter/second. 11.3% showed obstructive, and 4.9% showed restrictive pattern in spirometry. One (0.7%) subject had mixed pattern of respiratory morbidity. Among all the subjects having obstructive lung disease (including mixed pattern) 64.7% had mild, 29.4% moderate, and 5% had severe disease.
Table 1: Sociodemographic and occupational characteristics of study subjects (n=143)

Click here to view
Figure 2: Proportion of different morbidities among study subjects

Click here to view


[Table 2] In univariate regression among several independent variables increasing age (OR = 1.06, P value = 0.001), working inside mill (OR = 5.71, P value = 0.007), working > 48 hours per week (OR = 8.67, P value = 0.005) were found significantly associated with chronic respiratory morbidity. Current smoker had 1.98 times higher odds to have chronic respiratory morbidity than nonsmokers (P value = 0.16). These four variables were included in final multivariable model. Odds of smoking status was attenuated (AOR = 1.10, P value = 0.87). Work duration was also attenuated but remained significant (AOR = 7.37, P value = 0.013). OR of working inside the mill (AOR = 7.58, P value = 0.006) and increasing age (AOR = 1.08, P value = 0.001) were increased. This model fit was good as Hosmer--Lameshow test showed insignificant value and 21.9% to 36.7% variability of dependent variable was explained by the model as revealed by Cox and Snell and Nagelkerke R 2, respectively.
Table 2: Predictors of chronic respiratory morbidity: Univariate and multi-variable logistic regression (n=142)

Click here to view


[Table 3]. Majority (65.0%) felt musculoskeletal discomfort in last week among which 23.9% had pain in multiple zones. Loaders felt more discomfort comparison to others (44.6%). Back was the commonest site for most of work groups except for the machine men and loaders. Commonest area of discomfort among loaders was lower extremity (31.7%), followed by back (19.5%). Significant association of musculoskeletal discomfort was found with addiction to tobacco (OR = 2.82, P value = 0.009), job of loading and unloading (OR = 2.49, P value = 0.012), and central obesity (OR = 2.35, P value = 0.026). Duration of job was also included in final multivariable model (OR = 1.05, P value = 0.108). Adjusted model showed augmentation of OR in all four variables. This model was fitting well as Hosmer--Lameshow test revealed insignificant result and 16.2% to 22.2% variability of dependent variable was explained by this model by Cox and Snell and Nagelkerke R 2.
Table 3: Predictors of musculoskeletal morbidity: Univariate and multi-variable logistic regression (n=143)

Click here to view


[Table 4] Workers with jobs related to accounts and management were more hypertensive (37.0%) compared to others (OR = 2.226, P value = 0.085). Hypertension were significantly associated with increasing Age (OR = 1.08, P value < 0.001), BMI (OR = 1.15, P value = 0.01), and increasing years of smoking (OR = 1.06, P value = 0.017), presence of central obesity (OR = 3.21, P value = 0.006), and chronic respiratory morbidity (OR = 2.94, P value = 0.027). Central obesity was excluded in multivariable model due to high correlation with BMI (Spearman Rho = 0.73). Both age and year of smoking were included in final model due to poor correlation between them (Spearman Rho = 0.12). In adjusted model OR of job related to accounts and management (AOR = 0.93, P value = 0.90), years of smoking (AOR = 1.05, P value = 0.080), and chronic respiratory morbidity (AOR = 2.27, P value = 0.164) were attenuated. OR of increasing age (AOR = 1.06, P value = 0.010) and BMI (AOR = 1.17, P value = 0.017) were flattened but remain significant. This model was fitting well as Hosmer--Lameshow test revealed insignificant result and 17.9% to 28.1% variability of dependent variable was explained by this model by Cox and Snell and Nagelkerke R 2, respectively.
Table 4: Predictors of hypertension: Univariate and multivariable logistic regression (n=143)

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


A study by Prakash et al. at Tumkur in 2006 revealed prevalence of respiratory morbidity was highest (42.6%) followed by musculoskeletal (20%), conjunctivitis (6.8%), and skin allergy (4%). 10.6% of workers had low PEFR (<200 lit/min).[14] Rana et al. found the prevalence of respiratory morbidity at Burdwan in 2016 was 40.73% in which obstructive and restrictive disease were 24.60% and 16.13%, respectively. Higher risk of respiratory morbidity was noted if no protective measures used and working ≥9 hours/day but no association was seen with other.[8] Ghosh et al. found in 2008 that workers exposed to dust were presented with significant lower level of FVC, FEV1, and PEFR parameters compared to control in Karnataka.[15] Vijayashankar et al. showed PEFR (5.65 ± 1.84) in rice mill workers in Mysore district was significantly lower than unexposed controls (8.11 ± 1.41) and decrease of PEFR was inversely proportional to duration of exposure.[4] High prevalence of respiratory morbidity (34%) was also found among rice mill workers of Bangladesh by Ansari et al.[16] Koteswaramma et al. found significantly higher prevalence of respiratory morbidity among rice mill workers (74%) than control (26%) and respiratory morbidity was proportionately increasing with the duration of dust exposure. Respiratory symptoms were more in workers involved in sweeping and milling inside mill.[17] Present study showed lower prevalence of respiratory morbidity than other studies except Prakash et al. and Vijayashankar et al. This differential finding might be due to different sampling methods or younger population with less work duration and/or use of modern technology in studied mill. Due to lack of resources triangulation of spirometric findings with air quality monitoring inside mill could not be done. Significant association of chronic respiratory morbidity was noted with higher working hours and working inside mill. That corroborates with the findings of Rana et al., Koteswaramma et al., and Ghosh et al. Augmentation of OR of working inside mill was noted after introduction of smoking status in adjusted model which might be due to effect modification. However, this could not be confirmed statistically with stratified analysis since there were very few workers with chronic respiratory morbidity belonging to nonsmoker group.

Musculoskeletal distress was observed among 45.7% of the workers by Darbastwar et al. most of whom were coolies (70%) and helpers (19%). Common affected areas were low back (27.1%) and knee (25%). Musculoskeletal problem was significantly associated with duration of work.[5] Higher prevalence of musculoskeletal problems was found in the current study in comparison to the findings in the studies of Prakash et al. and Darbastwar et al. The most probable reason of this difference being the use of more sensitive tool (CMDQ) with minimum chance of recall bias (1 week of recall period) in this study. Unlike Darbastwar et al., the association of musculoskeletal discomfort with duration of work was not significant (P value = 0.078). Rather musculoskeletal morbidity was found significantly associated with tobacco use. Tobacco abuse may not be cause but effect of discomfort as studies showed antinociceptive effects of nicotine.[18] The difference in site of musculoskeletal discomfort among various types of workers was probably due to difference of work pattern and duration of standing hours according to the nature of work. Present study showed higher prevalence of diabetes (7.7%) and hypertension (20.9%) among workers than that of rural population of West Bengal as per NFHS 4.[19] Hypertension was associated with proximate variables like increasing age, BMI, and Presence of chronic respiratory morbidity in the present study. Patil et al. observed higher BP among rice mill workers compared to control in a study in Raichur.[20] Kaur et al. found high prevalence of hypertension (27.2%) and diabetes (16.3%) in male factory workers in Chennai and hypertension was associated BMI, waist–hip ratio, and increasing age.[21] Prabhakaran et al. showed similar proportion of hypertension (30%) and diabetes (15%) among workers in Delhi.[22] Findings of those studies were concordant with our finding. Several studies across the globe also suggested a relationship of increased blood pressure and diabetes with high density of SPM.[23],[24],[25],[26],[27],[28] some studies also demonstrated level of SPM inside rice mills are alarmingly higher than the recommended level.[29],[30],[31] Thus, longstanding exposure to SPM could be one of the important predictor of Non communicable diseases for these mill workers.

Though rice milling is one of the largest agro-based industries in India, most of the mills run as small to medium scale industry in unorganized sector and practically no training is meted out to the workers regarding prevention of exposure to hazards in their workplace. There is no provision of preplacement examination, periodic health screening, or health service.[32] Most of the workers have no health insurance coverage. Once sick mostly due to their unconducive working environment often they are out of work leading to poverty and more suffering. To fulfill this unmet need WHO has recommended integration of basic occupational health services (BOHS) with primary health care (PHC) settings which is basically a part of Alma Ata Declaration.[33] BOHS and PHC share some common values like holistic approach to health, health equity, accessible, and acceptable preventive and curative services to decrease burden of morbidities in a cost-effective approach. Thus, collaboration between these would enhance working life as well as economic prosperity for a country. PHC can be used for occupational health and hazard surveillance and provision of preventive and curative service to all workers including underserved groups who are from informal sector, agriculture, and migrant and contractual workers. Capacity building and awareness generation among employers as well as workers regarding identification and reduction of occupational hazards, warning signs of occupational diseases can also be carried out through this approach.[34],[35]


  Conclusion Top


In the present study, respiratory and musculoskeletal morbidities seemed to be a momentous problem among rice mill workers. Significant association of respiratory morbidity was found with dust exposure inside mill and increased work duration (>48 hours per week). Thus, optimization of working hours, effective, and continuous use of appropriate PPE like respirator, mask and use of appropriate ventilation technology should be made mandatory. Smoking inside mill should be prohibited. Moreover, periodic health screening with spirometry should be done among workers for early diagnosis and treatment of respiratory problems. This will play a long way in checking the onslaught of lung morbidity to the point of no return. Musculoskeletal morbidity was significantly associated with central obesity and job of loaders. Use of modern machinery for mechanized loading/unloading may be helpful. Proper placement after preplacement examination, training regarding ergonomically better posture, and frequent resting time are also needed. Prevalence of NCDs was quite high. Exhaustive and earnest health education regarding lifestyle modification for the prevention and control of NCD must advocate among these workers. Further research is required for generation of evidence-based intervention for promotion of health among workers. Also, all efforts must be made to provide these rice mill workers for a streamlined health care integrated to primary health care facilities so that comprehensive health care is meted out to them not only before and during employment but also after retirement.

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Director, All India Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, Kolkata for permission to conduct the study. We want to acknowledge the Human Factors and Ergonomics Laboratory at Cornell University as the source of CMDQ Questionnaire. We are thankful to owners of both rice mills for their permission and support and Mr. Debasis Roy, Social worker, for his immense support during data collection.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation. FAO in India [Internet]. [Place unknown]: © FAO; 2019. India at a glance; 2018 [cited 2018 Nov 30]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/india/fao-in-india/india-at-a-glance/en/.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Nayak P. Problems and prospects of rice mill modernization: A case study. J Assam University 1996;1:22-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
CPCB, Govt. of India. “Guidelines for (i) Siting of Rice Shellers/Mills; (ii) Handling and Storage of Rice Husk and (iii) Handling, Storage and Disposal of Ash Generated in Boiler Using Rice Husk as Fuel. [Internet]. Central Pollution Control Board, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India; 2012 [cited 2019 Sep 20]. Available from: http://164.100.107.13/upload/Publications/Publication_519_GuidelineReport.pdf.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Vijayashankar U, L R. Effect of rice mill dust on peak expiratory flow rate among rice mill workers of Mysore district. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol 2018;8:1240-3.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Darbastwar MA, Kumar B, Ravinder A. A study of prevalence of musculoskeletal disorder among the rice mill workers in Karimnagar. J Evolution Med Dent Sci 2016;5:1106-10.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Bankura.gov.in. Official Website of Bankura District, Government of West Bengal.[Internet]. National Informatics Centre, Bankura; © 2016 [updated 2019 May 01]. District Controller of Food and Supply. General Statistics, 3.2 Rice mill Details [cited 2019, May 07]. Available from: http://bankura.gov.in/departments/dcfs/dcfs_Office.htm.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Miller MR, Crapo R, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, et al. General considerations for lung function testing. Eur Respir J 2005;26:153-61.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Rana MC, Naskar S, Roy R, Das DK, Das S. Respiratory morbidity among rice mill workers in an urban area of Burdwan District, West Bengal: A cross-sectional study. Indian J Occup Environ Med 2018;22:5-10.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
9.
Reis J, Dubose K, Ainsworth B, Macera C, Yore M. Reliability and validity of the occupational physical activity questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005;37:2075-83.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Hedge A, Morimoto S, Mccrobie D. Effects of keyboard tray geometry on upper body posture and comfort. Ergonomics 1999;42:1333-49.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Erdinç O, Hot K, Özkaya M. Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity and Reliability of Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ) in Turkish Language [Internet]. Istanbul, Turkey; 2008 [cited 2019 Sep 20]. Available from: http://ergo.human.cornell.edu/Pub/AHquest/Turkish_adaptation_validation_of_CMDQ_research_report.pdf.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, MInistry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Clinical Anthropometric Biochemical (CAB) Manual [Internet]. 2014. [cited 2019 Sep 13]. Available from: http://rchiips.org/NFHS/NFHS4/manual/NFHS-4%20Biomarker%20Field%20Manual.pdf.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
O'Connor T, Manning P. Spirometry: Performance and Interpretation, a Guide for General Practitioners [Internet]. Irish Thoracic Society; 2005 [cited 2019 Sep 20]. Available from: https://irishthoracicsociety.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/SpirometryGuidelinespdf.pdf.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Prakash S, Manjunatha S, Shashikala C. Morbidity patterns among rice mill workers: A cross sectional study. Indian J Occup Environ Med 2010;14:91-3. Available from: http://www.ijoem.com/text.asp?2010/14/3/91/75696.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Ghosh T, Gangopadhyay S, Das B. Prevalence of respiratory symptoms and disorders among rice mill workers in India. Environ Health Prev Med 2014;19:226-33.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Ansari MMH, Karim MR, Mashud I. Symptoms of respiratory health problems in rice mill workers of Bangladesh. KYAMC J 2017;7:758-61.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Koteswaramma C. A comparative study of respiratory problems between the rice mill employees and their controls working in Mahaboobnagar town, Telangana state [Internet]. J. Evolution Med. Dent. Sci. 2017; 6:4297-4302, DOI: 10.14260/Jemds/2017/929. Available from :https://www.jemds.com/latest-articles.php?at_id=13888. [cited 2019 Oct 9].  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Shi Y, Weingarten TN, Mantilla CB, Hooten WM, Warner DO. Smoking and pain: Pathophysiology and clinical implications. Anesthesiology 2010;113:977-92.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), India, 2015-16: West Bengal. [Internet]. Mumbai: IIPS; 2017 [cited 2019 Sep 20]. Available from: http://rchiips.org/NFHS/NFHS-4Reports/WestBengal.pdf.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Patil PS. Effect of occupational exposure on blood cell counts, electrocardiogram and blood pressure in rice mill workers. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:CC01-3.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Kaur P, Rao T, Sankarasubbaiyan S, Narayanan A, Ezhil R, Rao SR. Prevalence and distribution of cardiovascular risk factors in an urban industrial population in South India: A cross- sectional study. J Assoc Physicians India 2007;55:771-6.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Prabhakaran D, Shah P, Chaturvedi V, Ramakrishnan L, Manhapra A, Reddy KS. Cardiovascular risk factor prevalence among men in a large industry of northern India. Natl Med J India 2005;18:7.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Urch B, Silverman F, Corey P, Brook JR, Lukic KZ, Rajagopalan S, et al. Acute blood pressure responses in healthy adults during controlled air pollution exposures. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113:1052-5.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Chuang K-J, Chan C-C, Shiao G-M, Su T-C. Associations between submicrometer particles exposures and blood pressure and heart rate in patients with lung function impairments. J Occup Environ Med 2005;47:1093-8.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Bellavia A, Urch B, Speck M, Brook RD, Scott JA, Albetti B, et al. DNA hypomethylation, ambient particulate matter, and increased blood pressure: Findings from controlled human exposure experiments. J Am Heart Assoc 2013;2:e000212.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Ibald-Mulli A, Stieber J, Wichmann HE, Koenig W, Peters A. Effects of air pollution on blood pressure: A population-based approach. Am J Public Health 2001;91:571-7.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Liu L, Ruddy TD, Dalipaj M, Szyszkowicz M, You H, Poon R, et al. Influence of personal exposure to particulate air pollution on cardiovascular physiology and biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in subjects with diabetes. J Occup Environ Med 2007;49:258-65.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Brook RD, Rajagopalan S, Pope CA, Brook JR, Bhatnagar A, Diez-Roux AV, et al. Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2010;121:2331-78.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Chandrathilaka KRM, Seneviratne SRDA, Lankatilake KN, Samaranayake DBDL, Karunarathna AK. Work environment of automated and non-automated rice mills in Amapara district, Sri Lanka. Int J Community Med Public Health 2018;5:3257-64.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Pranav PK, Biswas M. Mechanical intervention for reducing dust concentration in traditional rice mills. Ind Health 2016;54:315-23.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Dewangan KN, Patil MR. Evaluation of dust exposure among the workers in agricultural industries in North-East India. Ann Occup Hyg 2015;59:1091-105.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Saha RK. Occupational health in India. Ann Glob Health 2018;84:330-3.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Ministry of Health, Ministry of Labour, Government of Chile, World Health Organization. Integration of Workers' Health in the Strategies for Primary Health Care [Internet]. Santiago de Chile; 2009 May [cited 2009 Sep 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/occupational_health/activities/universal_health_coverage/ChileMeetingReport_OH_and_PHC_finalII.pdf?ua=1.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
World Health Organization. Connecting Health and Labour: Bringing Together Occupational Health and Primary Care to Improve the Health of Working People. Executive Summary [Internet]. The Hague, the Netherlands: WHO Global Conference on Connecting Health and Labour: What Role for Occupational Health in Primary Health Care; 2011 Dec [cited 2019 Oct 15]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/124659/WHO_HSE_PHE_ES_2012.1_eng.pdf; jsessionid=E7BC83D35636C28605E25E3900E97115?sequence=1.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
World Health Organization. Workers' health: Global plan of action. [Internet]. Sixtieth World Health Assembly, Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007 May [cited 2019 Oct 15]. Available from: https://www.who.int/occupational_health/WHO_health_assembly_en_web.pdf?ua=1.  Back to cited text no. 35
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
   Materials and Me...
  Result
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed196    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded22    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal