Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 698
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 1407-1412  

Bacterial pathogens from lower respiratory tract infections: A study from Western Rajasthan


Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

Date of Submission09-Nov-2019
Date of Decision08-Feb-2020
Date of Acceptance12-Feb-2020
Date of Web Publication26-Mar-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Anuradha Sharma
Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur - 342 005, Rajasthan
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_994_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Respiratory tract infections are the most common diseases that are associated with social burden for the patient. Western Rajasthan has cases of Cystic fibrosis due to migrant population. The dry and dusty environment has led to prevalence of silicosis and COPD. As per IDSA (2018) guidelines, patients attending Out-Patient Department do not need microbiological investigations for lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) except for influenza and tuberculosis. Aims: This study was conducted to identify the bacterial aetiology of LRTI among patients who attended AIIMS, Jodhpur, and to ascertain the current scenario of bacterial susceptibility in respiratory tract infections in order to optimize empiric therapy in Hospitals ad community. Methods and Material: In total, 1,775 lower respiratory tract samples were received in Bacteriology Section of Microbiology Department (January 2017 to December 2018). Bartlett's criteria were stringently used to assess quality of specimen. Semiquantitative cultures were done for tracheal aspirate and bronchoalveolar lavage samples. Following culture, the isolated organisms were identified and antimicrobial sensitivity was performed according to CLSI. Results: Total 769 bacterial pathogens were isolated from 1,775 samples collected from cases of VAP, HAP, CAP, COPD, and cystic fibrosis. Pseudomonas species was the commonest isolate (31%), followed by Klebsiella pneumonia (21.3%), Acinetobacter species (17.5%), Escherichia coli (15.4%), and Staphylococcus aureus (5%). Others include Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus, Burkholderia cepacia complex, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Nocardia. Gram-negative organisms showed increased resistance to routinely used antibiotics. Gram-positive organisms showed 100% susceptibility to vancomycin, linezolid, and clindamycin. Conclusions: Cotrimoxazole, βL-βLIs, aminoglycosides, and all second-line antibiotics tested were effective for treatment of RTIs.

Keywords: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, lower respiratory tract infections, and nonfermenters


How to cite this article:
Singh S, Sharma A, Nag VL. Bacterial pathogens from lower respiratory tract infections: A study from Western Rajasthan. J Family Med Prim Care 2020;9:1407-12

How to cite this URL:
Singh S, Sharma A, Nag VL. Bacterial pathogens from lower respiratory tract infections: A study from Western Rajasthan. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 10];9:1407-12. Available from: http://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2020/9/3/1407/281232




  Introduction Top


Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) are among most-common infectious diseases affecting humans' worldwide causing significant morbidity and mortality for all age groups. It is responsible for 4.4% of all hospital admissions and 6% of physicians' consultation. It accounts for 3%–5% of deaths in adults.[1] LRTI are often misdiagnosed, mistreated, and underestimated due-to its nonspecific presentation in community or hospital-setting. Etiological agents of LRTI vary geographically and timely.[2],[3] The problem is much greater in developing countries.[1] Recognition of the possible existence of lung microbiome has been a major recent revelation in medicine.[4] The increase in antibiotic-resistance has compromised selection of empirical treatment and choice of effective-antibiotic.[5]


  Objectives Top


The objective of the present study was to identify the bacterial aetiology of LRTI among patients who attended AIIMS, Jodhpur from January 2017 to December 2018 and to ascertain the current scenario of bacterial susceptibility in respiratory tract infections in order to optimize empiric therapy in patients presenting with cases of community acquired pneumonia (CAP), hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cystic fibrosis in various healthcare centers.


  Materials and Methods Top


Setting

This is a retrospective study conducted at the Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, for the duration January 2017 to December 2018. The study was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee wide letter number AIIMS/IEC/2019/1767 (06.04.2019).

Patient's enrolment

All the patients enrolled in the study were from Out-Patient Department (OPD), In-Patient Department (IPD), and Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The respiratory tract samples (sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL], endotracheal aspirate, gastric lavage, etc.) were obtained from the patients of all the age and sex groups, with clinical presentation of COPD, cystic fibrosis, CAP, VAP, HAP, post-influenza, old tuberculosis, cavitatory lesions, lung abscess, neoplasm, prolonged hospital stay, etc.; suggestive of LRTI. History of antibiotic consumption was also noted.

Sample collection and processing

In total, 1,775 samples of sputum, BAL, endotracheal aspirate, gastric lavage, etc., were obtained.

Sample selection was done: sputum-quality of sample was assessed based on Bartlett's scoring. Satisfactory sputum samples were further processed. BAL-microscopically percentage of neutrophils with engulfed bacteria was determined, and semiquantitative analysis ≥104 colony forming unit (CFU)/mL was done. Endotracheal aspirate: semi quantitative analysis ≥105 CFU/ml was done.

Samples were further processed for routine bacterial culture and sensitivity. Following culture, the isolated organisms were identified and antimicrobial sensitivity was performed as per laboratory standards and antibiotic interpretation was done as per Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines.[6]


  Results Top


In total, 1,775 respiratory specimens were received during the study period out of which 769 cultures yielded a significant pathogen and 1,006 cultures had growth of normal oropharyngeal flora.

It was realized that almost 50% of these isolates were in poorly collected samples. Swabs from endotracheal tubes were refused as it represents only colonization. Many a times, tracheal aspirates were mislabelled as BAL sample.

Among 769 positive cultures, 112 samples showed polymicrobial infection. Pseudomonas species 31.2% (275) was the most common isolate followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae 21.3% (188), Acinetobacter baumanii 17.5% (154),  Escherichia More Details coli 15.4% (136), and Staphylococcus aureus 5% (44). Others were as follows: Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus 3.2% (28), Burkholderiacepacia complex 1.1% (10), Stenotrophomonasmaltophilia 0.4% (4), and Nocardia 0.2% (2) [Table 1].
Table 1: Distribution of organisms presenting to OPD, IPD, and ICU

Click here to view


Oxacillin (1 μg) disc was used as surrogate marker to identify penicillin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Group A ββ-hemolytic Streptococci was identified presumptively with Bacitracin (0.04 U) disc. Demographic and clinical details (age, sex, location of patients, sample distribution) of the patients are provided in [Table 2]. Antibiotic resistance pattern of Gram-negative bacteria and Gram-positive bacteria are shown in [Table 3] and [Table 4], respectively.
Table 2: Demographic and clinical details of the patient (n=769)

Click here to view
Table 3: Antibiotic resistant (%) Gram-negative organism

Click here to view
Table 4: Antibiotic resistant (%) gram positive organism

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


In our study, LRTI were more common in males 73% than in females 27%. Male prevalence of LRTI may be due to their exposure to different group of population and due to some associated risk factors of respiratory tract infection, such as smoking, alcohol consumption, and COPD. Similar to other studies, our findings corroborated with the results accomplished by Shah et al., Panda et al., Saha et al., and Akingbade et al.[3],[7],[8],[9] It was observed that adults and the elderly males were most at risk of a severe respiratory condition. Almost one-third of cases were of pulmonary Kochs.

In this study, single and multiple organisms were isolated in 86.67% and 13.33%, respectively, of study population. These findings are similar with the study conducted by Saxena et al. and Narayanagowda et al.[10],[11]

In this study, Gram-positive 10.1% (89) and Gram-negative 89.9% (792) organisms were isolated. Similar observations have been shown in other studies as shown in [Table 5]. Among which nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB) were isolated in 50.3% (443/881) of respiratory samples. The importance of isolation of nonfermenters has increased in last decade, after more and more reports are correlating them with the either infection outbreaks in hospitals or healthcare-associated infections. Most of the patients were having prolonged hospital stay for more than a week. It supports the fact that these patients may have acquired some of these multidrug resistant pathogens in hospital settings as HAP and VAP. Identification of nonfermenters used to be considered as commensal flora, but due to increased awareness of their pathogenicity in certain patient population and improvement in diagnostic criteria, they are increasingly being reported.
Table 5: Comparison with other similar studies

Click here to view


Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter species, Klebsiella species and Staphylococcus aureus Scientific Name Search  are depicted in [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4] respectively.
Figure 1: Pseudomonas aeruginosa antimicrobial susceptibility pattern

Click here to view
Figure 2: Acinetobacter species antimicrobial susceptibility pattern

Click here to view
Figure 3: Klebsiella species antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Click here to view
Figure 4: Staphylococcus aureus antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Click here to view


In this study, 28.3% bacterial strains were isolated from ICU, whereas 51.7% were isolated from wards from which most isolates were Acinetobacter baumanii 73 (47.4%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae 59 (31.4%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa 44 (19.4%) similar to that seen in Ullah et al.[5] In other Study by Nishat et al.,[15] nonfermenters (61.11%) were the predominant isolates from Surgical ICU, whereas in the medical ICU, along with nonfermenters (47.91%), enterobacteriaceae (41.66%) was the most common organisms isolated.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is more commonly found in patients with chronic lung cavities or as a complication of treatment with immunosuppressive drugs. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated in 25.6% (226) cases, similar to Saha et al., Sethi et al., Sethi et al., and ElKorashy et al.[8],[16],[17]Pseudomonas was found to be sensitive to amikacin, piperacillin–tazobactum, ceftazidime–tazobactam, cefepime, gentamicin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. Similar findings were observed by Narayanagowda et al. and Vishwanath et al.[11],[13]

In this study, K. pneumoniae was the second most common Gram-negative isolate and was tested to be sensitive to piperacillin–tazobactum, amikacin, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, ceftazidime-tazobactam, cefepime, levofloxacin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and amoxyclav. These findings are same as observed in the study carried out by Regha et al., Saha et al., Saxena et al., Vishwanath et al., andKulkarni et al.[1],[8],[9].[10],[13],[14]

Malini et al.,[18] from Kolar in India, have documented the isolation of 6.8% (25 of 365) of NFGNB in respiratory samples. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is considered as a common nonfermenter to cause infection in hospital settings. Correct identification of this NFGNB assumes importance as it shows inherent resistance to commonly used broad spectrum β-lactam group antibiotics and even to imipenem.[6] Our study has shown the isolation of this bacterium in four cases. Burkholderia cepacia complex is another NFGNB colonizing and infecting patients with chronic respiratory illness. It is known to cause disease in cystic fibrosis patients, and once infected, it is very difficult to treat due to multiple intrinsic resistance to many β-lactam drugs, aminoglycosides, colistin and polymixin B, the first-line therapeutics of choice against serious pseudomonal infections.[6] In our study, Burkholderia cepacia complex was isolated in 10 cases from IPD (7) and ICU (2). Rahbar et al.[19] have shown the isolation of Burkholderia cepacia complexas 4.66% of all the nonfermenters isolated from different types of specimens (respiratory, blood, urine, wound, etc.).

NFGNB have shown resistance to amikacin, gentamicin, imipenem, cefepime, ceftriaxone, and piperacillin–tazobactam [Table 3]. The aminoglycosides that are considered as good option for life-threatening lower respiratory infections have shown high resistance in the present study for these nonfermenters wherever tested. There is poor penetration of aminoglycosides from blood into infected respiratory tissues so as to reach the local drug concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration necessary for the infecting organisms. This observation has also been discussed by earlier studies. All these nonfermenters are known for their inherent resistance to multiple groups of antibiotics. Hence, correct identification of these nonfermenters is very important for choosing correct antibiotic so as to reduce the morbidity and mortality. Any NFGNB culture isolate from respiratory tract infection should not be ignored as just contaminant but correlated clinically for its pathogenic potential and identified using standard methods, so as to institute appropriate and timely antibiotic coverage. It is equally important not to treat commensal NFGNBs.

In this study, among Gram-positive organisms, S. aureus 5% (44) was the most common pathogen isolated followed by Group A β-hemolytic Streptococci from OPD patients and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Staphylococcus aureus was sensitive to tobramycin, cotrimoxazole, and gentamicin, 56.9% were Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). All isolates were vancomycin and linezolid sensitive. Similarly in the study conducted by Narayanagowda et al.,[11] β-Hemolytic Streptococci was second frequently identified gram positive organism and was sensitive to penicillin group of antibiotics, erythromycin, clindamycin, and levofloxacin. Staphylococcus aureus and Aspergilli are known to cause secondary infections post-influenza. Increasingly fungal pathogens are being reported as cause of LRTIs from ICU.[20]

It is necessary to have policies regarding restrictive use of antibiotics such as carbapenems and colistin. Regular monitoring of such resistant isolates would be important for infection control in critical units.[21]

Strict implementation of the concept of 'antibiotic stewardship' has become necessary to conserve the already available antibiotics. Hospitals should have an “antibiotic policy” and facilities for proper monitoring of antibiotic usage along with effective infection control practices to check the issue of antibiotic resistance worldwide. Periodic analysis of types of respiratory pathogens and regular updation of their antibiograms should be done in every healthcare setting, so that changing trends can be identified and therapy adjusted accordingly.[1]

The trend towards increased use of molecular diagnostic tools will probably continue with increased availability of point of care testing.[4]


  Conclusion Top


This study reveals that a variety of pathogens are responsible for LRTI and antibiotics resistance has become a great public health issue. Gram-negative organisms showed increased resistance to routinely used antibiotics. Gram-positive organisms showed 100% susceptibility to vancomycin, linezolid, and clindamycin.

Proper identification of the probable pathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern can help our health professionals to choose the right antibiotic therapy and improve the outcome. Do not report everything that grows, knowledge of colonizers and contaminants in different clinical conditions is important. This year CDC (Center for Disease Control) has proposed theme during Fungal Disease Awareness week (September 23–27, 2019) think fungus if a case of pneumonia does not improve with appropriate antibiotics.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Regha IR, Sulekha B. Bacteriological profile and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of lower respiratory tract infections in a tertiary care hospital, Central Kerala. Int J Med Microbiol Tropical Dis 2018;4:18690.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ravichitra KN, Subbarayudu S. A study on the etiological trends and antibiogram of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) at a tertiary care hospital. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 2016;5:18-22.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Shah BA, Singh G, Naik MA, Dhobi GN. Bacteriological and clinical profile of Community acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients. Lung India 2010;27:54.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
4.
Murdoch DR, Werno AM, Jennings LC. Microbiological Diagnosis of Respiratory Illness: Recent Advances. InKendig's Disorders of the Respiratory Tract in Children; 2019. p. 396-405.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Ullah B, Ahmed S, Shahariar M, Yesmine S. Current trend of antibiotic resistance in lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs): An Experience in a teaching hospital in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Pharm J 2016;19:85-91.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017 and 2018  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Panda S, Prema NB, Ramani TV. Lower respiratory tract infection –Bacteriological profile and antibiogram pattern. Int J Cur Res Rev 2012;4:149-55.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Saha A, Das N. Clinico-bacteriological profile of lower respiratory tract infections in patients attending Tripura medical college and Dr. Bram teaching hospital, Tripura. Indian J Appl Res 2018;8:39-40.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Akingbade OA, Ogiogwa JI, Okerentugba PO, Innocent-Adiele HC, Onoh CC, Nwanze JC, et al. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of bacterial agents involved in lower respiratory tract infections in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria. Report Opinion 2012;4:25-30.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Saxena S, Ramnani VK, Nema S, Tripathi K, Dave L, Srivastava N. Bacteriological Profile in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (AECOPD). Annals of International Medical and Dental Research 2016;2:1.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Devanath SN. A bacteriological study of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease over a period of one year (Doctoral dissertation, RGUHS).  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Sarmah N, Sarmah A, Das DK. A study on the microbiological profile of respiratory tract infection (RTI) in patients attending Gauhati Medical College and Hospital. AIMDRAnn Int Med Dental Res2016;2:11.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Chawla K, Vishwanath S, Munim FC. Nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. causing respiratory tract infections in a tertiary care center. J Glob Infect Dis 2013;5:144.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Kulkarni G, Chaudhary D, Bhoyar A, Dugad S. Bacteriological profile in sputum and their antibiogram among the patients of acute exacerbation of COPD. MVP J Med Sci 2017;4:113-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Ahmed NH, Hussain T, Biswal I. Antimicrobial resistance of bacterial isolates from respiratory secretions of ventilated patients in a multi-specialty hospital. Avicenna J Med 2015;5:74.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
16.
Sethi S. Infectious etiology of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Chest 2000;117:380S-5S.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
ElKorashy RIM, El-Sherif RH. Gram negative organisms as a cause of acute exacerbation of COPD. Egyptian J Chest Dis Tuberc 2014;63:345-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Malini A, Deepa EK, Gokul BN, Prasad SR. Nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli infections in a tertiary care hospital in Kolar, Karnataka. J Lab Physicians 2009;1:62.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
19.
Rahbar M, Mehragan H, Haji Ali Akbari N. Prevalence of drug resistance in nonfermenter gram-negative bacilli. Iran J Pathol 2010;5:90-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Bassetti M, Garnacho-Montero J, Calandra T, Kullberg B, Dimopoulos G, Azoulay E, et al. Intensive care medicine research agenda on invasive fungal infection in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2017;43:1225-38.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Bhatta DR, Hamal D, Shrestha R, Supram HS, Joshi P, Nayak N, et al. Burden of multidrug resistant respiratory pathogens in intensive care units of tertiary care hospital. Asian J Med Sci 2019;10:14-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Objectives
   Materials and Me...
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed182    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded49    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal