Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 4366
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 7  |  Page : 3242-3245

Audit of level II scans in a tertiary center of a middle-income country (MIC)


1 Department of Neonatology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, South India
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, South India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Yenuberi Hilda
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit- 5 , Christian Medical College, Ida Scudder Road, Vellore - 632 004, Tamil Nadu
South India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_88_20

Rights and Permissions

Context: Significant anomalies are those that are lethal or those that require prolonged follow-up and unaffordable treatments. Detection of these anomalies allows early termination or the support systems necessary for pregnancies with these diagnoses. Anxiety associated with overdiagnosis makes the woman a victim of modern imaging technology. However, accurate detection of significant anomalies in a busy scan room of a developing country with the need to cater to large numbers is particularly challenging. Aims: The aim was to audit the diagnostic accuracy in a busy scan room. Settings and Design: Retrospective cohort in a tertiary center. Methods and Materials: Audit of significant anomalies identified at the 20-week scan was performed after the expected date of confinement. Anomalies that were missed or overdiagnosed were noted. Statistical Analysis Used: All the categorical variables in this research were summarized using counts and percentages. Results: Twenty-eight thousand women underwent morphology ultrasound during the study period. 963 (3.4%) women were detected to have anomalies at birth. Multiple anomalies were seen in 285 (30%) cases and isolated ones in 678 (70%) cases. Anomalies of the genitourinary system were the commonest followed by the anomalies of central nervous system. Only 53 (0.2%) anomalies were missed. They were mainly syndromes and anomalies of the cardiovascular system. The most significant anomalies that were identified could be diagnosed with a basic ultrasound machine. Conclusions: 910/963 (95%) of significant anomalies can be identified even in busy centers if a systematic assessment approach is ensured.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed40    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded15    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal