Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2019  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 7  |  Page : 2318--2321

Evaluating the awareness of ordinary people about relief operations and cardiopulmonary resuscitation when facing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest


Yadollah Ghasemi1, Shahram Molavynejad1, Mina Jouzi2, Akram Hemmatipour3,  
1 Atherosclerosis Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Nursing and Midwifery Sciences Development Research Center, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
3 Department of Nursing, Shoushtar Faculty of Medical Sciences, Shoushtar, I.R. Iran

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Shahram Molavynejad
Atherosclerosis Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Golestan St, Ahvaz
Iran

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this paper is to evaluate the awareness of ordinary people about relief operations and accurate cardiopulmonary resuscitation when facing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study including 500 ordinary people who were randomly selected over a 3-month period in Ahvaz County, Ahvaz, Iran, and then asked to perform resuscitation operation on medical moulages. Their performance was then evaluated using a 21-item checklist. Results: The awareness of participants about relief operations were only acceptable in 9 cases. Only 1 (0.2%) of them was able to detect a pulse and blood circulation as well as to relieve any airway obstruction. 7 (1.4%) were able to correctly find the position on the chest where external cardiac massage (ECM) should be performed. And only 1 could perform ECM at a rate of 100-120 compressions/min. Conclusion: Results obtained from the present study does not confirm the awareness of ordinary people when encountering OHCA. Hence, it is essential to hold related training courses at appropriate intervals to improve their skills and knowledge.



How to cite this article:
Ghasemi Y, Molavynejad S, Jouzi M, Hemmatipour A. Evaluating the awareness of ordinary people about relief operations and cardiopulmonary resuscitation when facing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.J Family Med Prim Care 2019;8:2318-2321


How to cite this URL:
Ghasemi Y, Molavynejad S, Jouzi M, Hemmatipour A. Evaluating the awareness of ordinary people about relief operations and cardiopulmonary resuscitation when facing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 10 ];8:2318-2321
Available from: http://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2019/8/7/2318/263805


Full Text



 Introduction



Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an emergency measure taken to preserve the life of a person who is in sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) or cardiac arrest due to an unexpected incident. Performing basic CPR procedure within 4-6 minutes after cardiac arrest—just before brain death—can dramatically increase the chance of restoring spontaneous blood circulation and survival up to four times until further measures are taken at the clinical center.[1],[2]

CPR is an effort to restore the breathing and circulation aiming to improve survival through basic and advanced measures including fast detecting and recognizing cardiac arrest and dialing the emergency number “115” to inform emergency centers about the incident, chest compressions at an standard rate, airway management, artificial breathing (mouth-to-mouth resuscitation or mechanical ventilation) and fast defibrillation (by professional rescuers).[3],[4] There is no report on performing CPR in Iran by a supervisor and/or ordinary people, but the operations are carried out in different countries at different levels, mainly related to educational and cultural levels. In Iran, the CPR, the reasons for not performing it, and the type of aid measures taken seemed to differ due to different educational, cultural and social aspects.[5] Though advances have been made, cardiac arrest remains the most important health problem in the country. In addition, it is also one of the causes of sudden death in most countries, which often happen outside the hospital (OHCA).[6]

Given the time importance, nearby people—as the primary contributors—are clearly at play. Otherwise, the life-saving time will be lost before medical emergency forces arrive. Obviously, complications are reduced with a positive attitude towards first aid procedures, motivation for acquiring relevant knowledge and having public skills in providing first medical assistance to injured patients. These can all dramatically increase the chances of survival. The CPR program was developed in the form of educating first aid procedures for all, with the measures taken by the incident and medical emergencies management in cooperation with other institutions in Iran, just after the announcement by the Ministry of Health in 2007. Certainly, any planning for the future requires basics, with the aim of determining the level of training required; and, undoubtedly, research is required in this regard.[7]

Ali Mohammadi (2017) reported a low level of knowledge and performance about CPR in high school students in Isfahan, Iran.[8] Masdari et al. (2017) reported a low level of awareness and attitude towards the CPR among firefighters, drivers and policemen in Sari, Iran.[7] Özbilgin et al. (2015) found in their study that only 3.6% of participants in Turkey were able to accurately perform CPR procedure outside the hospital.[9] Dobbiem et al. (2017) showed that 56% of the ordinary people do not have an appropriate level of awareness and confidence needed to perform the CPR procedure.[10] Salehi et al. (2015) report a low level of knowledge and performance of patients' attendants, which increased significantly after training.[11] Jarrah et al. (2018) showed that 86% of trained people have been able to perform CPR procedure correctly.[12] Ordinary people are the first/nearest, who have access to the incident and/or the patient. Therefore, adequate knowledge about CPR procedure, the positive attitude toward first aids aiming to implement relief operations and reducing related injuries are necessary.[6] The present study, therefore, was conducted in Ahvaz County, Iran, in 2017 aiming to evaluate the awareness of ordinary people about relief operations and CPR when facing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

 Methods



This was a descriptive study carried out during a three-month period in 2017. Participants were 500 ordinary people, who were randomly selected from 20 districts (25 from each district) in Ahvaz city, Iran. They were from districts Kianshahr, Lashkar, Shahrak-e Haffari, Taleghani, Kooy-e Sadi, Khoramshahr Junction, Zeytoon Karmandi, Manba-e Ab, Kooy-e Navvab, Zeytoon Kargrif Sad Dastgah, Kianpars, Khoramkoosh, Padadshahr, Zand Cross, Abadan Terminal, Pardis, Amanieh, Saheli Blvd and Kianabad. Participants were asked individually to perform CPR procedure on a human-like moulage. Their function was evaluated using a 21-item checklist. The checklist contains 4 sections, according to the 2015 reference: The first part contained personal information as well as a record of the CPR training course. The second part consisted of 4 questions on mental issues and maintaining calm in real-life situations as well as help from others and emergency centers by dialing the emergency number “115”. The third part contained 7 questions about the initial facing OHCA and preliminary evaluations. The fourth part contained 10 questions about relief operations and CPR. We then informed the emergency department about an OHCA case by dialing the emergency number “115” aiming to determine the time it takes for relief workers to arrive at the place where the incident has occurred.

Scoring was based on a 3-point Likert scale including 3 levels, namely good (3), moderate (2) and weak (1). The scores ranged from 21 to 63 and were categorized into 3 categories, namely good (64-50), moderate (35-49), and weak (21-34). A questionnaire and a checklist were prepared—besides the study of books, papers and benefiting expert opinions—and then submitted to 10 faculty members of the Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery and clinical professionals. The necessary modifications were made based on professionals' comments. The assay-observation method was used to determine the study's reliability, where the performance of the units studied simultaneously was studied through the observation of another researcher with the same level of education and experience and the study's reliability was estimated at 84%. After proposing the study objectives under ethical code IR.AUMS.REC.1396.1128, obtained from the University, the necessary confidentiality of the information was provided and explanations were presented on the possibility of leaving the study in cases of reluctance. The ethical principles of using existing resources were also observed. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to examine the normal distribution of data. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics V21 and related parameters including mean, standard deviation (SD), Chi-square test and Fisher test. Results with P value less than 0.05 were considered as significant.

 Results



In the present study, 323 (64.7%) of patients were male, 244 (48.8%) aged 15-31 years, 146 (29.2%) had diploma, 141 (28.2%) were self-employed, 393 (78.6%) had not completed a course on CPR procedure, and 108 (29.2%) had little knowledge of the subject mainly from cyberspace and television [Table 1]. Chi-square results showed a significant relationship between age group and success in performing CPR procedure (P = 0.04). Fisher test results indicated that the majority of participants have no previous background about the subject (P = 0.001).{Table 1}

Performing CPR procedure were unsatisfactory with 300 (60%) participants while acceptable only in 45 (9%) cases. 13 (2.6%) participants performed the procedure placidity. Only one (0.2) participant was able to accurately detect the pulse and circulation as well as to check airway for any possible obstruction. 7 (1.4%) of the participants were able to correctly recognize the ECM position on the chest, and only one could perform ECM at a rate of 100-120 compressions/min. None of the participants checked for vital signs after 5 ECM-breathing cycles [Table 2].{Table 2}

A digital chronometer was used to indicate how long does it take for an ambulance to arrive. The highest and lowest recorded times were 17:46 and 5:40 minutes, respectively.

 Discussion



The present study was designed to evaluate the awareness of 500 ordinary people about relief operations and CPR when facing OHCA in Ahvaz County, Iran, in 2017. According to the results, 20% of participants had acceptable CPR performance. Chen et al. (2017) studied 2094 high school students in China and found acceptable performance only in 25.6% of participants.[13] A similar result was reported in a study carried out by Ali Shammah et al. (2018) in Saudi Arabia on 98 students, where only 7.97% of participants were able to perform CPR as correctly as possible.[14] Ozbilgin et al. (2016) studied 259 football players in Turkey and found that 38% of participants have adequate awareness about the CPR procedure.[9] The level of awareness of the patients' attendants was estimated to be between 15-60% in European countries (Perkins et al., 0000); they reported higher rates in Spain and Germany, but a lower rate in Sweden.[15] Masdari et al. (2017) studied 500 firefighters, drivers, and policemen and reported the lowest level of awareness about CPR procedure (69%) with taxi drivers [7]. This can be occur due to inadequate training throughout the country.

Results of the present study revealed that only 4.2% of participants have the ability to perform ECM operations; whereas the report released by Ozbilgin et al. (2016) showed that 52% and 34.3% of students can accurately perform ECM on correct position on the chest and at a standard depth, respectively.[9] Wang reported that 79% of students can perform ECM on the correct position and at a standard depth.[16]

When assessing the ventilation status, it was found that about 13% of participants are able to perform artificial breathing at certain rhythms. Ozbilgin et al. (2016) reported that 26.7% of patients are able to accurately perform mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.[9] Wang reported that 63.5% of trained students can perform mechanical ventilation using Bag Valve Mask (BVM).[16]

According to the results of the present study, only 4.6% of participants were able to simultaneously perform ECM and artificial breathing, while this was reported to be 28.7% in Özbilgin et al.(2015) and 11% in Cu et al.(2009) study.[9],[17]

Only 2.4% of participants showed acceptable performance in checking for the pulse, breathing, consciousness, and airway management; whereas correct evaluating of the patient's consciousness and breathing were reported in [9] to be 40.7% and 49.3%, respectively. As reported in [12] 49.3% of participants (29% of them with the previous background on the subject) were able to simultaneously evaluate the pulse, breathing, and consciousness. In the present study, 21% of patients had an educational background. There has reported a positive relationship between the basic knowledge of the rescuer and the CPR performance.[6]

At the same time, older participants showed a higher CPR performance, probably due to more information they have acquired during their life through experiencing, media, etc.

 Conclusion



According to the results of the present study, the performance of ordinary people when facing OHCA is not acceptable and, therefore, courses on CPR procedure should be held at appropriate intervals to improve their awareness and skills.

Acknowledgements

The present study is the result of research no. CVRC-9610 approved by research deputy of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, under the ethical code IR.AJUMS.REC.1396.1128. The author would like to thank all who have collaborated on conducting this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Hajzargarbashi E, Omidi E, Esmailian M. Correlation of Patients' Baseline Characteristics with Success Rate of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; a Cross-Sectional Study. Adv J Emerg Med 2018;3:e6.
2Salari A, Mohammadnejad E, Vanaki Z, Ahmadi F. Survival and outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Iran J Crit Care Nurs 2010;3:45-9.
3Ro YS, Shin SD, Lee YJ, Lee SC, Song KJ, Ryoo HW, et al. Effect of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation program and location of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on survival and neurologic outcome. Ann Emerg Med 2017;69:52-61.e1.
4Nolan JP. High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Curr Opin Crit Care 2014;20:227-33.
5Dianati M, Assari-Maraghi A, Paravar M, Gilasi HR. Bystander's cardiopulmonary resuscitation rate and related factors in Kashan, Iran in 2014. Feyz J Kashan Uni Med Sci 2015;19:341-8.
6Avazbakhsh MH, Mirhosseini H, Entezari A, Jarahzadeh MH, Mirhosseini S. Evaluating the awareness of anesthesia and operating room senior students about accurate cardiopulmonary resuscitation in second semester 2012-2013 held by yazd university of medical sciences (Persian). J Anesth Pain 2016;6:55-61.
7Masdari F, Hosseini SH, Khankeh H, Habibi-Saravi R. Evaluating the knowledge and attitude of service providing personnel of sari regarding first aid; a cross-sectional study. Iran J Emerg Med 2018;5:1-5.
8Alimohammadi N, Baghersad Z, Marofi, M. Compression two methods” role playing and video type” of CPR education on knowledge and skills of high school students. J Nurs Educ 2017;6:24-30.
9Özbilgin Ş, Akan M, Hancı V, Aygün C, Kuvaki B. Evaluation of public awareness, knowledge and attitudes about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Report of İzmir. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2015;43:396.
10Dobbie F, MacKintosh AM, Clegg G, Stirzaker R, Bauld L. Attitudes towards bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Results from a cross-sectional general population survey. PloS One 2018;13:0193391.
11Salehi S, Zonoori S, Tabarsi B, Ghanbarian H, Nasiri M. The effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation education through compound method on knowledge and performance of entourages of patients with cardiovascular diseases. J Nurs Educ 2016;5:10-6.
12Jarrah S, Judeh M, Aburuz ME. Evaluation of public awareness, knowledge and attitudes towards basic life support: A cross-sectional study. BMC Emerg Med 2018;18:37.
13Chen M, Wang Y, Li X, Hou L, Wang Y, Liu J, et al. Public knowledge and attitudes towards bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in China. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:1-7. doi: 10.1155/2017/3250485.
14Shammah AA. Attitudes and awareness towards cardiopulmonary resuscitation among preparatory year students of Umm Al-Qura University. Int J Community Fam Med 2018;3:136.
15Perkins GD, Handley AJ, Koster RW, Castrén M, Smyth MA, Olasveengen T, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015: Section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation. Resuscitation 2015;95:81-99.
16Wang J, Zhuo CN, Zhang L, Gong YS, Yin CL, Li YQ. Performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during prolonged basic life support in military medical university students: A manikin study. World J Emerg Med 2015;6:179.
17Cu J, Phan P, O'leary FM. Knowledge and attitude towards paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation among the carers of patients attending the Emergency Department of the Children's Hospital at Westmead. Emerg Med Australasia 2009;21:401-6.