|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 2022-2027
Assessing knowledge and practice about eye injuries first aid, with awareness about the importance of early management among general population in Asser Region, 2020
Waleed Abdulwahab Dhabaan1, Khalid Hussein Almutairi2, Abdulbari Ahmed Alzahrani2, Ahmed Hussain Almutlaq2, Anas Ali Hadi Jali Asiri2, Raghad Saad Hasan Alshahrani2, Mazen Ahmed Hadi Jali2, Abdussalam Mohammed A Alqahtani2
1 Ophthalmology Department, Asser Central Hospital; Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
2 Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
|Date of Submission||29-Oct-2020|
|Date of Decision||09-Dec-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||21-Dec-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||31-May-2021|
Dr. Waleed Abdulwahab Dhabaan
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Eye injury is a leading cause of monocular blindness and is second only to cataract as the commonest cause of visual impairment. Injury is the commonest reason for eye-related emergency department visits. Aim: To assess population awareness regarding eye injuries first aids in Aseer region, Saudi Arabia. Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional approach was used targeting all accessible population in Aseer region, Southern of Saudi Arabia. Data were collected from participants using electronic pre-structured questionnaire. The tool will cover participants' socio-demographic data, participants' history of eye injury, awareness and practice regarding different types of eye injuries first aids. Results: The survey included 1213 participants who completed the questionnaire. Participants' ages ranged from 18 to 60 years old with mean age of 22.3 ± 11.9 years old. About 69% of the participants reported for having constant eye pain, 68.3% reported in case of Foreign Body (FB) in the eye, 66.9% reported for torn eye lid. Regarding signs of scratch eye, 64.2% reported for feel FB inside, 58% reported for eye pain and 55.2% reported for blurred vision. Exact of 25.7% of participants reported that they should blink several times in case of getting eye scratch, whereas 77.8% reported that they should rub the eye to try to remove any foreign object, 36.3% preferred to use the soothing eye drop. Conclusions In conclusion, the study revealed that public awareness regarding eye injury first aid in Aseer region was poor especially for chemical injuries. Physician role should be augmented and health education campaigns are advised.
Keywords: Actions, awareness, emergencies, eye injury, first aids, ocular injuries, population
|How to cite this article:|
Dhabaan WA, Almutairi KH, Alzahrani AA, Almutlaq AH, Jali Asiri AA, Hasan Alshahrani RS, Hadi Jali MA, Alqahtani AM. Assessing knowledge and practice about eye injuries first aid, with awareness about the importance of early management among general population in Asser Region, 2020. J Family Med Prim Care 2021;10:2022-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Dhabaan WA, Almutairi KH, Alzahrani AA, Almutlaq AH, Jali Asiri AA, Hasan Alshahrani RS, Hadi Jali MA, Alqahtani AM. Assessing knowledge and practice about eye injuries first aid, with awareness about the importance of early management among general population in Asser Region, 2020. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Jul 25];10:2022-7. Available from: https://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2021/10/5/2022/317291
| Background|| |
Eye injury is the main cause of monocular blindness in the United States and after cataract as the most reported cause of visual impairment. Injury is the most common cause for ophthalmic emergency department (ED) visits. Most eye injuries are preventable with the appropriate use of protective eyewear. Physical or chemical injuries of the eye are mostly serious danger which affects vision if not adequately treated within a reasonable time period., Ocular (eye) injuries can be presented by redness and pain of the affected eyes. Generally, tiny metallic projectiles may cause neither symptom. Tiny metallic projectiles should be considered when a patient tells about metal on metal contact, such as with hammering a metal surface. Corneal foreign body is one of the most reported avoidable occupational hazards. Intraocular foreign bodies usually is painless due to the lack of nerve endings in the vitreous humour and retina that can transmit pain sensations. Determining the precise location of intraocular foreign bodies is crucial for the management of patients with open-globe injury.
As such, general or ED doctors should refer cases involving the posterior segment of the eye or intraocular foreign bodies to an ophthalmologist.
Nearly, about 7% of eye injuries are managed in hospital EDs. Additionally, more than 60% of chemical injuries occur in workplace accidents, 30% occur at home and 10% are the result of an accident. Particularly, visual rehabilitation after an advanced eye injury occurs in less than 15% of the affected individuals. Men are threefold more likely to experience injuries than women; furthermore, individuals aged 16–45 years are most likely to be affected.
One moment a person can have perfectly normal eyes and the then he may be blind or at least had visual impairment. Therefore, population should be aware of situations that could lead to injury. Eye injuries may be trivial or serious. All safety measures should be known to avoid injury complications. The role of health education is to promote awareness amongst the public about how to protect their eyes and what to do in the case of injury. The current study aimed to assess knowledge and practice regarding eye injuries first aid and awareness about the importance of early management among general population in Asser Region, Southern Saudi Arabia.
| Methodology|| |
A descriptive cross-sectional approach was used targeting all population in Aseer region. The research ethical approval was obtained in the Research Ethics Committee at King Khalid University (HAPO-06-B-001) approval no. ECM#2020-0908 on 08/07/2020. The study was conducted during the period from June 20 to September 2020. Persons with smartphone and can access internet were included. All those below the age of 18 years and those who were not permanently living in Aseer region (or for at least 1 year) were excluded. Data were collected using structured questionnaire which developed by the researchers after literature review of relevant articles and expert's consultation. The questionnaire data included person's socio-demographic data, such as age, gender, education and history of eye injury. Participants' awareness regarding eye injury and first aids was assessed covering all types of eye injury (scratch, puncture and chemical injuries) besides first aids for each type. A panel of five experts reviewed the questionnaire independently for content validity and all suggested modifications were added. The questionnaire was uploaded online using social media platforms by the researchers and their relatives and friends to be filled with all population in Aseer region. All those who received the electronic questionnaire during the study period and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were invited to participate through filling the questionnaire.
After data were extracted, it was revised, coded and fed to statistical software IBM SPSS version 22 (SPSS, Inc. Chicago, IL). All statistical analysis was done using two-tailed tests. P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. For awareness items, each correct answer was given one-point score and total sum of the discrete scores of the different items was calculated. A patient with score less than 60% (18 points) of the maximum score was considered to have poor awareness, whereas good awareness was considered if he had score of 60% (19 points or more) of the maximum or more. Descriptive analysis based on frequency and percent distribution was done for all variables including demographic data, awareness items and participants source of information. Crosstabluation was used to assess distribution of awareness according to participants' personal data and source of information. Relations were tested using Pearson's Chi-square test.
| Results|| |
The survey included 1213 participants who completed the questionnaire. Participants' ages ranged from 18 to 60 years old with mean age of 22.3 ± 11.9 years old. The majority of the participants were females (85.7%) and 48.8% were single, whereas 48.4% were married. Regarding educational level, 33.1% were university students and 41.1% had bachelor's degree or post graduate degrees. About monthly income, 57% of the participants had average monthly income (5000–15000 SR). Exact of 190 (15.7%) participants had previous history of eye injury [Table 1].
|Table 1: Personal data of survey participants, Aseer region, Saudi Arabia|
Click here to view
[Table 2]a and [Table 2]b illustrates eye injury first aid awareness among survey participants. As for cases makes persons should go to ER, 69% of the participants reported for having constant eye pain, 68.3% reported in case of FB in the eye, 66.9% reported for torn eye lid and 65.9% reported for having visual problems. Regarding signs of scratch eye, 64.2% reported for feel FB inside, 58% reported for eye pain and 55.2% reported for blurred vision. Considering Action to do with injured eye, 39.6% reported for washing eye with clean water and 29.5% reported for close eyes. Exact of 25.7% of participants reported that they should blink several times in case of getting eye scratch, whereas 77.8% reported that they should rub the eye to try to remove any foreign object, 36.3% preferred to use the soothing eye drop. As for actions in cases of a bruise blow to the eye, 72.7% reported that they should gently apply cold compresses and 19.1% reported for applying warm compresses. Applying a clean protective cover on your eye until you can see a doctor was reported by 87% of the participants and 53.7% refused remove stuck items to eye in case of eye peroration. Exact of 37.3% of the partisans reported for doing nothing in case of eye cut or perforation occurs. Chemical injury complications were reported by 86.9% of the participants and 47.1% preferred going to physician or hospitals in case of chemical eye injury occurs. Exact of 60.8% of the participants agreed on that alkaline injuries are more dangerous than acidic and 28.9% reported they should remove particles in the eye in case of chemical injury. Also, 12.4% reported for wash with alkaline solution when injured with acidic material, wash with alkaline solution and 9.1% told when injured with alkaline material, wash with acid solution.
[Table 3] shows distribution of participants' awareness regarding eye injury first aid by their personal data. Exact of 35.6% of participants aged 31–40 years had good awareness level compared to 9.5% of young age group with statistical significance (P = 0.001). Also, 43.2% of those who had higher educational level (bachelor/postgraduate) had good awareness level compared to 4.8% of those with secondary level of education (P = 0.001). History of having eye injury was significantly associated with higher awareness level regarding first aids. (46.3% vs. 26.4%, respectively; P = .001). As for source of information, good awareness level was detected among 57.8% of those who got their information from study, 51.6% of those who got from physicians compared to 13.3% of those who reported families and friends as source of information (P = .001). In [Figure 1], as source of information regarding eye injury first aid among general population, through internet accounted 33.3%, Others (23.5%), 19% of those who got their information from study, 13.7 from physicians and 13.7% of those who reported from families and friends.
|Table 3: Distribution of participants awareness regarding eye injury first aid by their personal data|
Click here to view
|Figure 1: Source of information regarding eye injury first aid among general population, Aseer region, Saudi Arabia|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The current study aimed to assess public awareness regarding eye injury first aid and importance of early management. The most common eye injuries are work related and mostly due to physical or chemical factors., First aid awareness can play significant role in minimizing the serious complications of eye injuries which may end with complete blindness.
The current study revealed that nearly two thirds of the study participants correctly reported signs and symptoms of eye injuries that necessitates ER visit. As for actions to do with injured eyes, nearly one third of the participants reported fir rinse eyes with saline and cold water, whereas others reported different actions including closing eyes and using anti-inflammatory eye drops. Going to ER or physician was not a common option among participants which is a negative finding needs assessment and interpretation. Regarding actions if had scratch eye, participants reported good awareness for avoiding eye rubbing and wearing their contact lenses but also only one fourth of them reported for doing more blinks and one third reported for avoid using redness relieving drops which makes their awareness level regarding scratch eye first aid on moderate level. Blow eye exposure first aid reported by study partisans which is applying cold compresses was very good (three quarters of the participants). Considering cut or penetrating eye injuries, the majority of participants reported for covering eye in case of cuts or puncture in the eye. Nearly, half of them advised for avoiding removing anything stuck in the penetrated eye but very few percent told know about avoiding rinsing the eyes with water. As for chemical eye injuries, more than three quarters of the participants know that this type of injuries is dangerous. Washing eyes with much water and going to hospital were the most reported actions reported by the participants (nearly half of them) which are good. Also, nearly two out of each three know about the seriousness of alkaline eye injuries but only less than the third know that they should locate and remove particles in the eye in case of chemical injury. Less than half of the participants know about not using the antagonist chemical to wash eyes (acidic in case of alkaline injury and alkaline in case of acidic injury). In total, the study revealed that only 29.5% of the study participants had good awareness level regarding eye injury first aid. This can be explained by that the main source of information reported among the participants was internet and other different sources. This can mislead the reader if not specialized or was taught by experts. The physician role in providing first aid information was less than expected and should be improved.
Regarding factors associated with good awareness level, the current study showed that good awareness level regarding eye injury first aid was among middle- and old-aged participants who had good experience and may be exposed for different types of eye injuries. Also, highly educated persons had good awareness level and his is explained by that nearly 20% of the participants gained their information from study and more than half of them had good awareness. Also, those who had their information from physicians recorded high level of awareness.
| Conclusions and Recommendations|| |
The current study revealed that public awareness regarding eye injury first aids was not satisfactory especially for the most dangerous types (chemical injuries). Also, the concept of going to hospital or physician in case of eye injury is not dominant among participants which may be due to reported physician's poor role in providing information regarding first aids. Public awareness regarding first aids including eye injuries 6 emergencies should be improved through period health education campaigns, paying more effort by health care workers for explain the main actions can be committed in case of injured eye and incorporating first aids in study courses.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Leonard R. Statistics on Vision Impairment: A Resource Manual, 2000. New York, NY: Lighthouse International; 2000.
Nash EA, Margo CE. Patterns of emergency department visits for disorders of the eye and ocular adnexa. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1222-6.
Pargament JM, Armenia J, Nerad JA. Physical and chemical injuries to eyes and eyelids. Clin Dermatol 2015;33:234-7.
Duffy B. Managing chemical eye injuries. Emergency Nurse 2008;16:25-9.
Smith D, Wrenn K, Stack LB. The epidemiology and diagnosis of penetrating eye injuries. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:209-13.
Duma SM, Bisplinghoff JA, Senge DM, McNally C, Alphonse VD. Evaluating the risk of eye injuries: Intraocular pressure during high speed projectile impacts. Curr Eye Res 2012;37:43-9.
Onkar A. Commentary: Tackling the corneal foreign body. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020;68:57-8.
] [Full text]
Kollarits CR, Di Chiro G, Christiansen J, Herdt JB, Whitmore P, Vermess M, et al
. Detection of orbital and intraocular foreign bodies by computerized tomography. Ophthalmic Surg 1977;8:45-53.
Xiang H, Stallones L, Chen G, Smith GA. Work-related eye injuries treated in hospital emergency departments in the US. Am J Ind Med 2005;48:57-62.
Morgan SJ. Chemical burns of the eye; causes and management. Br J Ophthalmol 1987;71:854-7.
Seimon R. Preventing blindness from eye injuries through health education. Community Eye Health 2005;18:106-7.
Channa R, Zafar SN, Canner JK, Haring RS, Schneider EB, Friedman DS. Epidemiology of eye-related emergency department visits. JAMA Ophthalmol 2016;134:312-9.
Mancini G, Baldasseroni A, Laffi G, Curti S, Mattioli S, Violante FS. Prevention of work-related eye injuries: Long term assessment of the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention among metal workers. Occup Environ Med 2005;62:830-5.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]