Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 1147
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 8  |  Page : 2886-2892  

Does parity and duration of lactation have any effect on the bone mineral density of the femur and lumbar spine in Indian women? A cross-sectional study from the Northeast region of India


1 Department of Trauma and Emergency, Base Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India
2 Department of Orthopaedics, Base Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India
3 Department of Medicine, Base Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India
4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Base Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India

Date of Submission29-Nov-2020
Date of Decision17-Feb-2021
Date of Acceptance03-May-2021
Date of Web Publication27-Aug-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sanjay Kumar Rai
Department of Orthopaedics, Base Hospital, Guwahati, Assam - 781 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2349_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: The effects of multiple pregnancies and period of lactation on bone density have not been studied till date and there is very less data available, especially from developing countries like India. Lumbar spine and femoral neck were used to measure BMD and results were recorded. Objective: To find out the effect of parity and period of lactation on occurrence of osteoporosis in spine and femoral neck in women of the Northeast region of India. Materials and Methods: The cross-sectional study included 294 perimenopausal and postmenopausal women aged 30–65 year old. Age, body mass index (BMI), parity, total lactation period, menopausal status, duration of menopause socioeconomic status, and nutritional history were noted. The dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry system was used to measure the BMD of lumbar and femoral neck BMD. Multiple regression analysis was done for finding out the association of parity and lactation with BMD. Results: The parity was inversely related with BMD of lumbar spine (β = −0.138, P = 0.00423) and BMD of femoral neck (β = −0.142, P = 0.00487). This relation remained significant after adjusting for age, BMI, and duration of menopause. Period of lactation was also inversely correlated with BMD for lumbar spine (β = −0.0812, P = 0.0012) and BMD of femoral neck (β = −0.033, P = 0.0031). Conclusion: The number of parity and prolonged period of lactation have a negative effect on BMD in both regions especially in the lower socioeconomic strata with poor nutritional intake. Our data supports that parity and duration of lactation can be associated with future osteoporosis.

Keywords: Bone mineral density, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), lactation, parity


How to cite this article:
Shaki O, Gupta TP, Rai SK, Upreti V, Patil D. Does parity and duration of lactation have any effect on the bone mineral density of the femur and lumbar spine in Indian women? A cross-sectional study from the Northeast region of India. J Family Med Prim Care 2021;10:2886-92

How to cite this URL:
Shaki O, Gupta TP, Rai SK, Upreti V, Patil D. Does parity and duration of lactation have any effect on the bone mineral density of the femur and lumbar spine in Indian women? A cross-sectional study from the Northeast region of India. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Sep 27];10:2886-92. Available from: https://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2021/10/8/2886/324695




  Introduction Top


In developing and developed countries, osteoporosis is rampant and it is a silent chronic metabolic disease. It goes unnoticed until a fragility fracture occurs or an X-ray is taken for other illnesses. It is further observed that its effects are most significant in postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis is a silent metabolic bone disease characterized by reduced bone mineral density.[1] It goes unnoticed until fragility fracture occurs. It is a well-known fact that mobilization of calcium and increased bone resorption take place at the end of pregnancy and further increases during the lactation period.[2],[3] In the present literature, there have been several controversies regarding whether high parity and/or prolonged lactation periods have any role in the appearance of osteoporosis and effects on bone density in this subset of women population. Low BMD has been noted during pregnancy and lactation, which was considered to be transient.[4],[5] However, it may persist for a longer duration in developing countries like India where maternal care needs to be improved on many fronts like prehospital care, antenatal and postnatal care, diet and supplements, and family support.[6–9] There are many risk factors responsible for low bone density in Indian women, but the effect of number of pregnancies and period of lactation need to be studied.

Heidari et al.[10] noted that the number of pregnancies does not associate with occurrences of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Yazici et al.[11] noted that long or repeated periods of lactation do not significantly associate with the occurrence of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Turan et al.[12] noted that women with multiple pregnancies have the same BMD as nulliparous. On the contrary, Sharma et al.[13] and Lee et al.[14] noted that multiparity and longer lactation have a negative impact on BMD.

During pregnancy, it is estimated that about 2%–3% of maternal calcium is transferred to the fetus mostly in the second half of pregnancy. During the lactation period, women lose a further approximately 400-mg calcium per day during breastfeeding.[14],[15],[16] Thus, BMD further decreases during lactational amenorrhea, which further accentuates bone loss.

Many endocrine changes occur that initiate compensatory biochemical changes like higher levels of Vitamin D, changes in growth hormone, calcitonin, parathyroid hormone, and serum prolactin level. These endocrine changes increase calcium absorption in the kidney and intestine. These changes improve bone mineral density and reduce the negative effect of pregnancy on the skeletal system. It is noted that BMD decreases by 2%–3% despite these counterregulatory endocrine system activation during pregnancy. It is also noted that in the initial phases of lactation, especially within 6 months, there is decreases in bone density by 5%–6%, which regains in the subsequent next 6-month postlactation.

Thus, the multiple gestation and duration of lactation may affect BMD. In the present literature, confusing data and results exist. Heidari et al.[10] and Yazici et al.[11] noted that the long breastfeeding duration is not a risk factor for low bone mass later in life, further Turan[12] noted that an even grand multiparity (women with ten pregnancies) does not increase a risk for osteoporosis. Since the majority of published data is from a developed country where maternal care is much more advanced than developing countries like India, more so in these countries, women give birth to one or two children and the duration of lactation is variable. There is very scanty data available from India on effect of multiple gestation and lactation on BMD. The aim of present study is to find out whether parity and lactation has any association on BMD in these regions.


  Materials and Methods Top


This is a hospital-based, cross-sectional study done in the Department of Orthopaedics and Obstetrics and Gynecology in the tertiary care institute from January 2018 to February 2020. The study protocol was approved by the Institute Ethics Committee (EC/2018/02). dated 01 Jan 2018. Consecutively, 294 women aged 30–65 years were included after informed consent. The study protocol was approved by the Institute Ethics Committee (EC/2018/02). A basic demographical data and questionnaire regarding age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), parity, total lactation period, dietary habits, alcohol intake, smoking, excessive tea/coffee intake, socioeconomic status, and menopausal status were recorded for all the study population. Women who were taking medicine for any medical disorder, which can affect BMD in a greater way, like hypo- and hyperthyroidism, hypo-/hyperparathyroidism, glucocorticoid therapy, chronic kidney disease, and inflammatory bowel disease, etc were excluded from present study. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used for BMD at both regions.

Statistical Analysis

We used SPSS software (version 19; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for all statistical analysis. Initially, we used descriptive statistics for the calculation of mean ± standard deviation (SD). Pearson's correlation was used for correlation between independent variables and the dependent variables of the spine and femur BMD. For independent effect of parity and lactation on BMD, a simple linear regression was used. To assess the effect of age, parity, period of lactation, BMI, and years since menopause on BMD, multiple regression analysis was used. We set the 95% limit and 5% level as significant and the P value was set at < 0.05 to be considered as significant.


  Results Top


The demographic characteristics of the included subjects are shown in [Table 1]. Independent predictors of low BMD for the Lumbar spine and femoral neck are shown in [Table 2]. In the present study, it is noted that the parity was inversely proportional to BMD in relation to femoral neck (r2 = 0.4981), standardized regression coefficient (β = −0.142, P = 0.00487) as well as to lumbar spine (r2 = 0.3275, β = −0.138, P = 0.00423) in linear regression analysis. We noted a similar association after adjusting for age, BMI, period of lactation, and menopause (β = −0.342, P = 0.00487 and β = −0.378, P = 0.00423 for femur and spine, respectively) as shown in [Table 3] and [Table 4] and [Figure 1] and [Figure 2].
Table 1: Demographical characteristics of the study population

Click here to view
Table 2: Independent predictors of low BMD for the lumbar spine and femoral neck

Click here to view
Table 3: Independent predictors of femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD obtained from linear regression analysis

Click here to view
Table 4: Multiple regression analysis of lumbar spine and femur neck bone mineral density versus age, body mass index, parity, total duration of lactation, years since menopause

Click here to view
Figure 1: Correlation of bone mineral density of femoral neck with parity

Click here to view
Figure 2: Correlation of bone mineral density of lumbar spine with parity

Click here to view


Period of lactation was also inversely proportional to femoral neck BMD (r2 = 0.3015, β = −0.033, P = 0.0031) and for lumbar spine BMD (r2 = 0.2954, β = −0.0812, P = 0.0012) in linear regression. While in multiple regression analysis, this relationship remained intact and significant after adjusting for age, BMI, parity, and period of menopause for both, femoral neck BMD (β = −0.033, P = 0.0031) as well as for lumbar spine BMD (β = −0.0812, P = 0.0012) as shown in [Table 4] and [Figure 3] and [Figure 4].
Figure 3: Correlation of bone mineral density of femoral neck with duration of lactation

Click here to view
Figure 4: Correlation of bone mineral density of lumbar spine with duration of lactation

Click here to view


For the independent association between duration of lactation and low BMD at both regions, logistic regression analysis was performed. A significant value obtained from comparisons of BMD in both was included in the logistic regression analysis, as shown in [Table 2]. Independent predictors of lower BMD in the femoral neck were age, BMI, physical activity, parity, and duration of menopause, duration of lactation, low socioeconomic status, and poor dietary habits, whereas age, BMI, parity, and duration of lactation were independent predictors of lower BMD in the lumbar spine. Subsequently, in multivariate logistic regression analysis, the period of lactation was also found to be an independent risk factor for BMD at both regions [Table 3].


  Discussion Top


We investigated the effect of multiple pregnancies and period of lactation on BMD in Indian women and noted that there was a significant association between the parity and the total lactation period on BMD of the femoral neck and spine. The women with a longer period of lactation had the lowest BMD at both regions. We also noted that as multiple pregnancies increase, bone density decreases, in both places. This relationship remained intact significantly after adjusting for age, BMI, and menopausal years.

This may be because too many pregnancies were quite frequent in this region and population. Women in this region were not much educated and the majority belongs to poor socioeconomic strata, poor nutritional status, and cannot afford protein-rich food, milk, and any calcium-rich supplements in their diet and it is further added with inadequate maternal and child healthcare facilities.

The finding of our study is also supported by a few studies and consistent with the finding of Yilmaz et al.,[17] which noted that spinal and femoral BMD in postmenopausal women are related to reproductive factors like period of lactation and number of pregnancy and suggested that both factors may be as a risk for development of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Allali et al.[18] in a study of 730 postmenopausal women noted a significant negative correlation between parity in both spine and femur BMD. However, Gur et al.[19] observed a significant decrease in BMD with parity for the spine and not for the femoral neck, but lower BMD was observed in trochanter and Ward's triangle of the femur. Another study by Hreshchyshyn et al.[20] study on 352 women noted that femoral neck bone density decreased with an increasing parity, without any effect on the spine BMD. Few studies, which observed similar results, have been summarized in [Table 5].
Table 5: Summary of the studies regarding correlation of parity and period of lactation on femur and lumbar spine BMD

Click here to view


On the other hand, few authors reported contrary results and observed that no association between parity and BMD is summarized in [Table 5].

We feel that the entire period of lactation and the parity are related to each other and it is difficult to differentiate their individual effect on the BMD.

In the present study, multiparity and duration of lactation have a negative effect on both femur and spine BMD. Although in graph 4 there is an inverse relationship between lactation and BMD for both regions, our results are supported by Sharma et al.,[13] who studied 196 peri- and postmenopausal women between 40 to 60 years and noted that multiparity and prolonged period of lactation have a negative impact on bone density more in lower socioeconomic strata with poor dietary intake. A similar result was also noted by Kojima et al.,[30] who reported that the total period of lactation was inversely correlated with BMD (r = −0.293, P < 0.01).

However, Salari et al.[31] noted that the bone loss usually occurs in pregnancy, but if combined with lactation, it will have a protective effect on bone density. Lenora et al.[27] in their study noted that multiparity or prolonged lactation has no negative or detrimental effects on mother's BMD in a later age. Dursun et al.[32] in 1486 postmenopausal women over the age of 40 years observed that the total periods of lactation are a risk factor in the development of osteoporosis.

Some authors observed different results; Okyay et al.[33] noted that parity has a protective role against the osteoporosis; however, extended lactation period for more than one year per child, increases the risk by many folds, especially in the developing countries. Prolonged hypoestrogenemia caused by prolonged lactation added by the additional burden of frequent pregnancies with poor or inadequate nutrition may be responsible for osteoporosis and cannot be compensated by the various protective mechanisms.

These variations in the result may be due to difference in design studies (population characteristics, cross-sectional, comparative groups, number of the study population, follow-up period, and statistical analysis), the timing of the postpartum studies, dietary habits, and nutritional status of mothers, racial differences, maternal age, the onset of menarche, parity, and duration of lactation, which show inconsistencies of data.[34],[35] Few studies commented on the protective effect of lactation on BMD[36–38]; however, other studies indicate detrimental effect,[17],[39],[40] while some authors reported no significant difference of parity on BMD.[41–45]

Furthermore, the variation of the results may be due to the wide variation in the period of lactation. According to the WHO, breastfeeding is two types: first, exclusive breastfeeding, which refers to absolute breastfeeding for 4 months that may be extended to 6 months without water included; and second, predominant breastfeeding in which in addition to breast milk, water, or juices will be given. The wide variation of results may be due to these different practices of lactation.

Miller et al.[46] suggested that during breastfeeding, estrogen causes an inhibitory effect on periosteal bone formation through osteoblast and increases subperiosteal new bone formation, which increases bone size after weaning.

Role of Primary Physician

Primary health caregivers must educate the women regarding family planning and maintain good bone health by encouraging calcium and Vitamin D rich diet during prepregnancy, during pregnancy, and thereafter.

Limitation of the Study

The present study has few limitations firstly small sample size; second, it was not a population-based study. Recalling of the periods of lactation in the past may be difficult and may not be accurate. To reach a definitive conclusion, a large population-based observational study is required.


  Conclusion Top


Based on a present study, we may suggest that multiparity and longer periods of lactation have a significant negative effect on bone densities of both the regions i.e femoral neck and lumbar spine, especially in lower socioeconomic strata with poor nutrition. Present study supports that multiparity and period of lactation can be considered as a risk factor for future osteoporosis.

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to all participants and those who helped in this study.

Financial Support and Sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Neuner JM, Zimmer JK, Hamel MB. Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with vertebral compression fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51:483-91.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Glerean M, Furci A, Galich AM, Fama B, Plantalech L. Bone and mineral metabolism in primiparous women and its relationship with breastfeeding: A longitudinal study. Medicina (B Aires) 2010;70:227-32.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Møller UK, Við Streym S, Mosekilde L, Rejnmark L. Changes in bone mineral density and body composition during pregnancy and postpartum. A controlled cohort study. Osteoporos Int 2012;23:1213-23.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Wei W, Shary JR, Garrett-Mayer E, Anderson B, Forestieri NE, Hollis BW, et al. Bone mineral density during pregnancy in women participating in a randomized controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation. Am J Clin Nutr 2017;106:1422-30.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Lebel E, Mishukov Y, Babchenko L, Samueloff A, Zimran A, Elstein D. Bone mineral density in gravida: Effect of pregnancies and breast-feeding in women of differing ages and parity. J Osteoporos 2014;2014:897182.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Vora KS, Mavalankar DV, Ramani KV, Upadhyaya M, Sharma B, Iyengar S, et al. Maternal health situation in India: A case study. J Health Popul Nutr 2009;27:184-201.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Singh S. Maternal and child health services in India -- past, present and future. Indian J Matern Child Health 1997;8:1-4.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Mohapatra A, Gomare M. A critical appraisal of the maternal and child health scenario in a metropolitan city in India with reference to achievements of millennium development goals. J Fam Med Prim Care 2019;8:995-1001.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Singh R, Neogi SB, Hazra A, Irani L, Ruducha J, Ahmad D, et al. Utilization of maternal health services and its determinants: A cross-sectional study among women in rural Uttar Pradesh, India. J Health Popul Nutr 2019;38:13.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Heidari B, Heidari P, Nourooddini HG, Hajian-Tilaki KO. Relationship between parity and bone mass in postmenopausal women according to number of parities and age. J Reprod Med 2013;58:389-94.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Yazici S, Korkmaz U, Erkan M, Korkmaz N, Baki AE, Alçelik A, et al. The effect of breast-feeding duration on bone mineral density in postmenopausal Turkish women: A population-based study. Arch Med Sci 2011;7:486-92.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Turan V. Grand-grand multiparity (more than 10 deliveries) does not convey a risk for osteoporosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90:1440-2.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Sharma N, Natung T, Barooah R, Ahanthem SS. Effect of multiparity and prolonged lactation on bone mineral density. J Menopausal Med 2016;22:161-6.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Lee EN. Effects of parity and breastfeeding duration on bone density in postmenopausal women. Asian Nurs Res 2019;13:161-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Kominiarek MA, Rajan P. Nutrition recommendations in pregnancy and lactation. Med Clin North Am 2016;100:1199-215.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kovacs CS. Calcium and bone metabolism in pregnancy and lactation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:2344-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Yılmaz H, Erkin G, Polat HA, Kkşen S, Sallı A, Uğurlu H. Effects of Reproductive Factors on Bone Mineral Densitometry. Turkish Journal of Osteoporosis/Turk Osteoporoz Dergisi 2012;18.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Allali F, Maaroufi H, Aichaoui SE, Khazani H, Saoud B, Benyahya B, et al. Influence of parity on bone mineral density and peripheral fracture risk in Moroccan postmenopausal women. Maturitas 2007;57:392-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Gur A, Nas K, Cevik R, Sarac AJ, Ataoglu S, Karakoc M. Influence of number of pregnancies on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women of different age groups. J Bone Miner Metab 2003;21:234-41.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Hreshchyshyn MM, Hopkins A, Zylstra S, Anbar M. Associations of parity, breast-feeding, and birth control pills with lumbar spine and femoral neck bone densities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;159:318-22.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Sharma N, Natung T, Barooah R, Ahanthem SS. Effect of multiparity and prolonged lactation on bone mineral density. J menopausal med 2016;22:161.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Keramat A, Patwardhan B, Larijani B, Chopra A, Mithal A, Chakravarty D, et al. The assessment of osteoporosis risk factors in Iranian women compared with Indian women. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:28.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Shin CS, Choi HJ, Kim MJ, Kim JT, Yu SH, Koo BK, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis in Korea: A community-based cohort study with lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density. Bone 2010;47:378-87.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
El Maghraoui A, Guerboub AA, Mounach A, Ghozlani I, Nouijai A, Ghazi M, et al. Body mass index and gynecological factors as determinants of bone mass in healthy Moroccan women. Maturitas 2007;56:375-82.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Karlsson C, Obrant KJ, Karlsson M. Pregnancy and lactation confer reversible bone loss in humans. Osteoporos Int 2001;12:828-34.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Cure-Cure C, Cure-Ramírez P, Teran E, López-Jaramillo P. Bone-mass peak in multiparity and reduced risk of bone-fractures in menopause. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2002;76:285-91.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Lenora J, Lekamwasam S, Karlsson MK. Effects of multiparity and prolonged breast-feeding on maternal bone mineral density: A community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health 2009;9:19.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Hiz O, Ediz L, Tekeoglu I. Effect of number of pregnancies on bone mineral density. J Int Med Res 2010;38:1816-23.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Streeten EA, Ryan KA, McBride DJ, Pollin TI, Shuldiner AR, Mitchell BD. The relationship between parity and bone mineral density in women characterized by a homogeneous lifestyle and high parity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:4536-41.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Kojima N, Douchi T, Kosha S, Nagata Y. Cross-sectional study of the effects of parturition and lactation on bone mineral density later in life. Maturitas 2002;41:203-9.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Salari P, Abdollahi M. The influence of pregnancy and lactation on maternal bone health: A systematic review. J Family Reprod Health 2014;8:135-48.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Dursun N, Akin S, Dursun E, Sade I, Korkusuz F. Influence of duration of total breast-feeding on bone mineral density in a Turkish population: Does the priority of risk factors differ from society to society? Osteoporos Int 2006;17:651-5.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Okyay DO, Okyay E, Dogan E, Kurtulmus S, Acet F, Taner CE. Prolonged breast-feeding is an independent risk factor for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Maturitas 2013;74:270-5.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Prentice A. Calcium intakes and bone densities of lactating women and breast-fed infants in the Gambia. Adv Exp Med Biol 1994;352:243-55.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Woo J, Meung SSF, Ho SC, Chan SM. Is there a typical Chinese diet and what are the health implications? Ecol Food Nutr 1999;38:491-503.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Feldblum PJ, Zhang J, Rich LE, Fortney JA, Talmage RV. Lactation history and bone mineral density among perimenopausal women. Epidemiology 1992;3:527-31.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Hu JF, Zhao XH, Chen JS, Fitzpatrick J, Parpia B, Campbell TC. Bone density and lifestyle characteristics in premenopausal and postmenopausal Chinese women. Osteoporos Int 1994;4:288-97.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Kent GN, Price RI, Gutteridge DH, Allen JR, Rosman KJ, Smith M, et al. Effect of pregnancy and lactation on maternal bone mass and calcium metabolism. Osteoporos Int 1993;3(Suppl 1):44-7.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Cohen A, Kamanda-Kosseh M, Dempster DW, Zhou H, Müller R, Goff E, et al. Women with pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis (PLO) have low bone remodeling rates at the tissue level. J Bone Miner Res 2019;34:1552-61.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Popivanov P, Boianov M. Osteoporoza pri bremennost i kŭrmene [Osteoporosis in pregnancy and lactation]. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia) 2002;41:40-3.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Chowdhury S, Sarkar NR, Roy SK. Impact of lactational performance on bone mineral density in marginally-nourished Bangladeshi women. J Health Popul Nutr 2002;20:26-30.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Khoo CC, Woo J, Leung PC, Kwok A, Kwok T. Determinants of bone mineral density in older postmenopausal Chinese women. Climacteric 2011;14:378-83.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Laskey MA, Prentice A. Effect of pregnancy on recovery of lactational bone loss Lancet 1997;349:1518-9.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Carranza-Lira S, Mera JP. Influence of number of pregnancies and total breast-feeding time on bone mineral density. Int J Fertil Womens Med 2002;47:169-71.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Yan G, Huang Y, Cao H, Wu J, Jiang N, Cao X. Association of breastfeeding and postmenopausal osteoporosis in Chinese women: A community-based retrospective study. BMC Womens Health 2019;19:110.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Miller SC, Bowman BM. Rapid improvements in cortical bone dynamics and structure after lactation in established breeder rats. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2004;276:143-9.  Back to cited text no. 46
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
   Materials and Me...
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed176    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded20    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal