Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care

CASE REPORT
Year
: 2014  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 449--451

Intravesical migration of intrauterine contraceptive devices with stone formation


Simmi Aggarwal1, Rajinder Paul Jindal2, Anupam Deep1,  
1 Department of Radio-Diagnosis, GGS Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, Punjab, India
2 Department of Surgery, GGS Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, Punjab, India

Correspondence Address:
Simmi Aggarwal
Department of Radio-Diagnosis, GGS Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, Punjab
India

Abstract

Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD) have been associated with the multitude of complications. We present a rare case report of a 30-year-old female in whom the IUCD (Cu-T) migrated into the urinary bladder leading to calculus formation. The migrated IUCD encrusted with stones was successfully retrieved.



How to cite this article:
Aggarwal S, Jindal RP, Deep A. Intravesical migration of intrauterine contraceptive devices with stone formation.J Family Med Prim Care 2014;3:449-451


How to cite this URL:
Aggarwal S, Jindal RP, Deep A. Intravesical migration of intrauterine contraceptive devices with stone formation. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2014 [cited 2020 Dec 5 ];3:449-451
Available from: https://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2014/3/4/449/148147


Full Text

 Introduction



Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD) are widely used reversible contraceptive method and are cost-effective and have low complication rates. [1],[2] Uterine perforation during the insertion is an uncommon complication of IUCD and its incidence range from 0 to 1.6/1000 insertion. [3] Perforation of the uterus and intravesical migration is extremely rare. Once the IUCD has penetrated the bladder, it usually becomes encrusted with calculi and associated with lower urinary tract symptoms. [1],[2],[3],[4],[5] In this report, we present a case in which the IUCD perforated the uterus and migrated to the bladder, which was encrusted with calculi at the time of diagnosis, and the patient presented with severe dysuria.

 Case Report



A 30-year-old female gravid 4, para 3 came to the gynaecology outpatient department with 11/2 months history of pain in suprapubic region with severe dysuria. She also gave a history of off and on suprapubic pain from last 4 years. Patient had amenorrhea of 11/2 months for which she had taken Medical Termination pill and now she had bleeding per vaginum. She had undergone ultrasonography to rule out retained products, which revealed dense acoustic shadows in the urinary bladder s/o? calculi [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. Uterus and ovaries were unremarkable. Further X-ray kidneys, ureters, and bladder (KUB) was done, which revealed a Copper-T (Cu-T) in the pelvic region with fine radio opacities along the margins of Cu-T thereby suggesting an intravesical Cu-T (manufacturer detail not known) [Figure 3]. Magnetic resonance examination revealed Cu-T in the urinary bladder. There was no fistulous tract between the uterus and urinary bladder. Fat planes between the urinary bladder and uterus were maintained. Cervix and vagina were unremarkable [Figure 4]a and b. Her medical history revealed insertion of Cu-T 5 years back, but was not aware of its expulsion.{Figure 1}{Figure 2}{Figure 3}{Figure 4}

Cystoscopy revealed an impacted T-shaped device encrusted with yellowish material within the urinary bladder, which could not be removed cystoscopically. Hence, cystostomy was done and IUCD was removed [Figure 5]. Postoperative period was uneventful and the patient was discharged in a satisfactory condition.{Figure 5}

 Discussion



Intrauterine contraceptive devices is the most popular method of reversible contraception due to its high efficacy for fertility regulation, low-risk, and low-cost. [5] Complications with IUCDs remain rare. These include spontaneous abortion, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), uterine perforation, heavy bleeding, dysmenorrhea, and unplanned pregnancy. The rate of spontaneous abortion is doubled. The risk of PID is increased 10-13% with IUCD in situ.

The rate of uterine perforation has been estimated between 0 and 1.60/10,000 insertions. The pathogenesis of uterine perforation of IUCD may occur by two mechanisms. First, uterine perforation can occur at the time of insertion, especially when associated with severe abdominal pain. [3],[6],[7] Second, proposed mechanism of perforation is by a gradual pressure necrosis of the uterine wall by IUCD (likely at its lead point) with essential migration out of the uterus. Migration and perforation may or may not be facilitated by uterine contractions. [3],[7] About 80% of uterine perforation are free in the peritoneal cavity. IUCD migration into adjacent organs leads to bowel obstruction, perforation peritoneal, appendicitis, vesical calculus formation, obstructive nephropathy, fistula formation, menouria and intra peritoneal adhesions leading to infertility. [3],[8],[9]

In 1992, Dietrich reported eight cases of intravesical IUCD migration with development of urinary symptoms as early as 3 months to as late as 5 years after insertion. [1] Our patient was also having off and on suprapubic pain with dysuria for last 4 years. These urinary symptoms are related to migration of IUCD into the urinary bladder. The presence of IUCD in bladder leads to calculus formation overtime. The degree of stone formation is variable and independent of the duration in the bladder. [2],[6]

The device can either be partially or completely encrusted with calculi. [5] In our patient, there was complete encrustation of the device. It has also been suggested that pregnancy helps in erosion of the uterine wall with IUCD and therefore secondary perforation is considered to be the most likelihood mechanism. [5] Our data supports this hypothesis as pregnancy had occurred after insertion of IUCD.

Sonography with transabdominal and transvaginal is a useful method to detect IUCD migration as well as encrustation of calculi, which can be well-diagnosed by the presence of calculus in plain X-ray KUB. In our case also the IUCD showed encrustation which was seen as fine calcification on plain X-ray. Computed tomography scan is also a very effective imaging modality in demonstrating IUCD relation with adjacent structures. Magnetic resonance image further delineates fistulous tracts between the uterine and urinary bladder.

Treatment option for IUCD removal varies. Cystoscopic extraction of the device and stones is preferred as there is less morbidity with high success rate. [2] However, in our case, the removal was not possible cystoscopically, and cystostomy was performed for removal of IUCD. Lithotripsy of bladder stones may be required preceding the extractions in large stones. [6]

 Conclusion



Chronic pelvic pain and dysfunctional voiding symptoms with a history of an unretrieved IUCD must be carefully researched for possible perforation of the uterus with intravesical migration of IUCD. Any displaced IUCD should be removed due to potential complications.

References

1Dietrick DD, Issa MM, Kabalin JN, Bassett JB. Intravesical migration of intrauterine device. J Urol 1992;147:132-4.
2Ghanem MA, Sultan SM, Ghanem AA, Zantay FM. Double Intravesical Migration of Intrauterine Device: Presented With Vesical Stone Formation.
3Gillis E, Chhiv N, Kang S, Sayegh R, Lotfipour S. Case of urethral foreign body: IUD perforation of the bladder with calculus formation. Cal J Emerg Med 2006;7:47-53.
4Ozgür A, Sismanoglu A, Yazici C, Cosar E, Tezen D, Ilker Y. Intravesical stone formation on intrauterine contraceptive device. Int Urol Nephrol 2004;36:345-8.
5Sataa S, Sami BR, Sabeur R, Karim C, Ali H. Bladder calculus resulting from the migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device: A report of ten cases. Int J Nephrol Urol 2011;3:54-61.
6Tosun M, Celik H, Yavuz E, Cetinkaya MB. Intravesical migration of an intrauterine device detected in a pregnant woman. Can Urol Assoc J 2010;4:E141-3.
7Caspi B, Rabinerson D, Appelman Z, Kaplan B. Penetration of the bladder by a perforating intrauterine contraceptive device: A sonographic diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;7:458-60.
8Zakin D, Stern WZ, Rosenblatt R. Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. I. Classification, complications, mechanism, incidence, and missing string. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1981;36:335-53.
9Timonen H, Kurppa K. IUD perforation leading to obstructive nephropathy necessitating nephrectomy: A rare complication. Adv Contracept 1987;3:71-5.