Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care

COMMENTARY
Year
: 2017  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 201--203

Nuclear medicine consultation: A useful tool in primary care to enable more accurate diagnosis


Asif Ali Fakhri 
 Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Asif Ali Fakhri
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
USA

Abstract

In the high volume general practitioner setting, there is a need for triaging clinical questions pertaining to specific patients into ones that are readily answered, and those that would more effectively and efficiently be answered by the subspecialist. In this way, the nuclear medicine consultation provides the general practitioner a physiologic imaging specialist's perspective for answering complex clinical questions. A formal nuclear medicine consultation can be a valuable tool in identifying a targeted molecular imaging approach to answering a specific clinical question and can prove useful in both appropriate diagnostic study selection as well as accurate image interpretation.



How to cite this article:
Fakhri AA. Nuclear medicine consultation: A useful tool in primary care to enable more accurate diagnosis.J Family Med Prim Care 2017;6:201-203


How to cite this URL:
Fakhri AA. Nuclear medicine consultation: A useful tool in primary care to enable more accurate diagnosis. J Family Med Prim Care [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Jan 16 ];6:201-203
Available from: https://www.jfmpc.com/text.asp?2017/6/2/201/219997


Full Text



In the outpatient setting, it has been shown that greater stress from uncertainty and too high perceived workload are associated with higher levels of general practitioner burnout.[1] The use of consultation has been shown to be inversely related to workload intensity, and, thus, primary care physician stress. Similarly, consultation in the inpatient setting has been shown to be an essential tool for accurate and timely diagnosis; in fact, its use can be an indicator of patient complexity.[2]

 Why Do We Need Nuclear Medicine Consultation?



Nuclear medicine is a clinical and laboratory medical specialty that uses radioactive tracers to study physiologic, biochemical and cellular processes for diagnosis and therapy.[3],[4] As a physiologic imaging modality gathering of information pertaining to all aspects of the patient including history, physical examination, and diagnostic testing prior to, and at the time of, imaging is requisite to methodology selection and image interpretation.[3],[5] Careful consideration of all relevant clinical information has been shown to have major influences on interpretation of nuclear imaging, and can vastly improve specificity.[6] Although impact on patient management has not been studied extensively – in both the inpatient and outpatient settings, formal consultation allows the nuclear medicine clinician to formally and completely evaluate the patient, choose the most appropriate molecular imaging technique to assess the particular physiologic process in question, and give a more definitive diagnosis on the basis of imaging findings. Formal nuclear medicine consultation can aid in accurate diagnosis.

 Molecular Tracer Selection for Localizing Infection



For instance, the algorithmic approach in diagnosing infection through the various molecular imaging techniques has been well described.[7] However, there should be knowledge of available local equipment, personnel, and radiopharmaceuticals in a particular clinical setting.[7] Choosing an alternatively appropriate study in scenarios where the desired nuclear medicine study cannot be performed, due to lack of any one of the above-mentioned indispensable components, may require the expertise of a nuclear medicine specialist. For example, if the local radiopharmacy is not equipped to radiolabel leukocytes for infection imaging, then a decision must be made whether to pursue alternative methods including 18 F-FDG PET or 67 Ga-Citrate SPECT imaging, based on availability and whether the patient can undergo a multi-day study or not. Similarly, in patients with fever of unknown origin, although radiolabeled leukocyte scans utilizing 111 In-oxine or 99 mTc-HMPAO labelled leukocytes would be desirable, this may not be feasible in the case of leukopenic patients.[4]

Furthermore, imaging characteristics for each radiopharmaceutical and labelling technique must be carefully considered for each patient.[7],[8] Clinicians inexperienced in nuclear medicine are privy potential pitfalls in imaging for each molecular imaging technique used in diagnosing infection.[7] For instance, in a patient being worked up for vertebral osteomyelitis 67 Ga-Citrate may be desirable, but if the patient received gadolinium contrast for a contrast-enhanced MRI, then the bio-distribution of the tracer would be significantly altered.[4]

In multi-day studies, including 111 In-oxine labelled leukocyte and 67 Ga-Citrate studies, there can be a drastic effect on the length of stay, if an incorrect or inappropriate study is requested. A nuclear medicine specialist can readily determine, after formal evaluation, or chart review, the appropriate patient preparation required and even whether a nuclear study is appropriate. Although validation is needed, this could not only decrease length of stay, if the imaging study is not warranted, but it can also improve diagnostic accuracy because of better patient preparation. This could be examined prospectively by diagnostic accuracy with and without nuclear medicine consultation.

 Protocol Selection in Nuclear Cardiology



The benefits of nuclear cardiology consultation are already well established, in the form of risk assessment by cardiologists before radionuclide imaging.[9] With pre-screening of patients for stress-rest myocardial perfusion imaging, patients that would benefit from stress only protocol could be selected appropriately, which could decrease the hospital stay. More importantly, there may be a difference in the way images are interpreted, when all clinical information, including physical examination, ECG findings, medication history, and medical as well as surgical history are not taken into consideration.[5],[6]

 Clarifying Cognitive Impairment With the Help of Nuclear Neurology



Improved characterization of neuropsychiatric pathology is another beneficial use of the nuclear medicine consultation. In cases of cognitive impairment in either the inpatient the differentiation of neurodegenerative disease, vascular disease or psychiatric illness can be difficult on cerebral perfusion SPECT or 18 F-FDG PET.[10] In such cases, formal consultation can allow a more tailored interpretation of the findings. In normal pressure hydrocephalus. correlation with physical examination following lumbar drainage of CSF has been shown to impact diagnosis, and can help the interpreting physician in radionuclide cisternography interpretation.[11] Similarly, in brain death evaluation, collaboration with the primary neurologist can help correlate the clinical findings with scan data to more appropriately diagnose brain death.[4]

 Consulting for Thyroid Dysfunction



In the outpatient setting, the advantages for nuclear medicine consultation are well known.[12] Primarily, the role in the outpatient setting for the nuclear medicine consultation has been for the management of thyroid disorders including differentiated thyroid carcinoma, toxic multinodular goiter, and Graves' disease. Ablation with 131 I and postablation monitoring with serum markers and follow-up radioiodine imaging continues to be a common reason for the nuclear medicine consultation.[13] However, consultation prior to any diagnostic nuclear medicine study in the outpatient setting, can have the added value of providing more clinical information to the image interpreter.

 Inpatient Consultation for Routine Nuclear Medicine Studies



Other routinely performed studies including hepatobiliary, renal, and gastrointestinal scintigraphy as well as infrequently performed studies imaging are commonly utilized by the general practitioner service. For these studies imaging technique as well as radiopharmaceutical, type can be influenced by the patient-specific clinical information. For example, in hepatobiliary imaging, hyperbilirubinemia can be an indication to use 99 mTc-Mebrofenin instead of 99 mTc-Disofenin; and based on the fasting status of the patient, cholecystokinin may or may not need to be administered.[4] In renal scintigraphy, whether diuretic or ACE inhibitor study needs to be performed can be essential if obstruction or renal artery stenosis are clinical questions to be answered.[4]

In some patients, these studies may not be warranted at all, due to physiologic factors limiting the bio-distribution of radiotracer, or inability of a specific imaging technique to answer the clinical question at hand. Lastly, as with the other studies, image interpretation can greatly improve with tailored clinical history by the consulting nuclear medicine specialist. Although we need more evidence, studies to look at the diagnostic accuracy with and without tailored clinical history could further elucidate this.

 Conclusion



Because of increasing scrutiny on ordering providers to curb the number of diagnostic imaging studies that are ordered, instead of a more streamlined use of imaging studies, there is an overall reluctance to ordering imaging studies altogether. This is exacerbated by the general practitioner's workload and unfamiliarity with nuclear medicine. General practitioners must remember that nuclear medicine is a physiologic, rather than a structural, imaging modality. Thus, like many medicine subspecialties, it requires careful consideration of all all relevant clinical information including history, physical examination, and supportive diagnostic testing.[3] The importance of clinical information in the interpretation of other diagnostic imaging modalities has been previously described. However, further research into the impact of this crucial information on the interpretation of nuclear medicine studies and its impact on patient care needs to be better characterized. Nevertheless, there is considerable potential value to the nuclear medicine consultation in both the inpatient and outpatient settings; not only for selecting the appropriate test but also for more accurate image interpretation. In this way, nuclear medicine consultation can surely have major input in the clinical decision-making process on the wards and the clinic, and warrants further consideration.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Bachman KH, Freeborn DK. HMO physicians' use of referrals. Soc Sci Med 1999;48:547-57.
2Jordan MR, Conley J, Ghali WA. Consultation patterns and clinical correlates of consultation in a tertiary care setting. BMC Res Notes 2008;1:96.
3Graham MM, Metter DF. Evolution of nuclear medicine training: past, present, and future. J Nucl Med 2007;48:257-68.
4Ziessman HA, O'Malley JP, Thrall JH, Fahey FH. Nuclear medicine : the requisites. Fourth edition. ed. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Saunders, Elsevier Inc.; 2014.
5Simons M, Parker JA, Udelson JE, Gervino EV. The role of clinical data in interpretation of perfusion images. J Nucl Med 1994;35:740-1.
6Simons M, Parker JA, Donohoe KJ, Udelson JE, Gervino EV. The impact of clinical data on interpretation of thallium scintigrams. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology 1994;1:365-71.
7Powe J. Diagnosing infection. J Family Community Med 1997;4:17-9.
8Gotthardt M, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Boerman OC, Oyen WJ. Imaging of inflammation by PET, conventional scintigraphy, and other imaging techniques. J Nucl Med 2010;51:1937-49.
9Hendel RC, Berman DS, Di Carli MF, Heidenreich PA, Henkin RE, Pellikka PA, et al. ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Circulation 2009;119:e561-87.
10Camargo EE. Brain SPECT in neurology and psychiatry. J Nucl Med 2001;42:611-23.
11Lieb JM, Stippich C, Ahlhelm FJ. [Normal pressure hydrocephalus]. Der Radiologe 2015;55:389-96.
12Dhingra VK, Saini S, Basu S. How a tertiary medical nuclear medicine department at the Himalayan area in India can be established and function in an exemplary manner. Basic rules revisited. Hell J Nucl Med 2015;18:252-6.
13American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines Taskforce on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer, Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, et al. Revised American thyroid association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2009;19:1167-214.